Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Postcode verified
CM23 5QL
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance7
“Governors are providing excellent support to the school during the headteacher’s absence.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 714
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
4 July 2013 Mrs Ruth Boniface Acting headteacher Birchanger Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School Birchwood Birchanger Bishop's Stortford CM23 5QL
p.1
of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 3 July 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection. The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in May 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, I held meetings with you, two subject leaders and five governors, including the Chair of the Governing Body. I met the school improvement partner and spoke with a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I evaluated the school improvement plan. We carried out short visits to lessons and I spoke to pupils about their work.
p.1
Context
After the inspection, one supply teacher left the school. A new supply teacher is currently teaching the Year 5/6 class until the end of term. Two new teachers have been appointed for September 2013. The number of children in Reception is rising and plans are in place to provide additional teaching space. The headteacher is currently on sick leave.
p.1
Main findings
With the support of the governing body, you are tackling weaknesses with determination during the headteacher’s absence and the school is making progress towards becoming a good school. The school plan identifies clearly what needs to be done and by when. It is a helpful tool for improvement because staff and governors are using it to check progress at regular intervals. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01216 799168 Direct email :beverley.joyner@serco.com Teachers report that you are doing a ‘tremendous job’ and this visit confirms their views. You are instrumental in sustaining high staff morale and you focus on what matters most. For example, with the support of all teachers, you are taking energetic action to ensure that assessment of pupils’ work is more accurate and work to
p.1
Main findings
challenge the more able pupils is progressing well. The use of targets to raise standards requires consolidation. You are managing provision for pupils who need additional help more effectively and training for learning support assistants is in hand. Because the school is small, you are also teaching full time and your burden is heavy. Swift action is required to strengthen leadership capacity. The literacy and numeracy leaders are taking effective action to improve the quality of teaching and pupils’ work in their subjects. There is evidence of significant improvement in the Year 5/6 class and pupils told me that they understood their work more and that behaviour was now good. Governors are providing excellent support to the school during the headteacher’s absence. They ensure that they have the necessary information to verify the progress made. They are also keeping parents well informed and liaising with the
p.2
Main findings
local authority so that the provision of an additional classroom is managed efficiently with minimum disruption to pupils’ learning and welfare. Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to: raise expectation further by setting targets for the number of pupils making and exceeding expected progress in all years strengthen the leadership capacity of the school during the headteacher’s absence. Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The school improvement partner and local authority advisers are supporting the school. You can contact a local experienced headteacher for further guidance. Staff work with a local school to share good practice and improve assessment. An induction and mentoring programme is in place for the new teachers. I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Chelmsford Diocese education adviser and the Director of Children’s Services for Essex local authority.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion