Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 18 Jul 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Samantha Morgan-Price

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Samantha Morgan-Price

  • Postcode verified

    SE18 3SJ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+22Mostly positivemore positive than 35% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveeffectivelysecureimprovedimprovingpositiveaccuratelyconsistent
Criticismnot alwaysweaknessespoor

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
814
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 50, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mrs F Neligan Notre Dame Catholic Primary School 169 Eglinton Road London SE18 3SJ

p.1

Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 28 June 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in May 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I held meetings with you, other senior leaders, teachers, the Chair of the Governing Body and a representative from the diocese. Informal discussions were held with pupils and work books were scrutinised. The school improvement plan was evaluated.

p.1

Context

A class teacher will leave at the end of July 2013. A replacement has been made for September 2013. At the beginning of June, the school entered into a partnership with a local school. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com

p.1

Main findings

The inspection outcome has made leaders more aware of the need to secure better pupil achievement. The revised development plan addresses the main areas needing improvement. Each development point has relevant identified actions, success criteria and milestones. However, milestones are not always specific enough or dates of completion are too vague or not urgent enough. In addition to this, success criteria are not always detailed or linked closely enough to actions.

p.2

Main findings

Recent actions taken have resulted in a predicted rise in standards for most years. The results predicted for Year 2 and Year 6 at the end of July, if realised, will reflect improvement on the previous year. Weaknesses in teaching are being tackled more rigorously, as targeted professional development activities are addressing key points. For example, support has been given to improve marking, pupil assessment and writing. Work seen in books shows an improved level of marking since this support started. There are increased examples of pupils responding to questions written in their books. The training given to develop teacher’s ability to more accurately assess pupils, has given them a realistic understanding of pupils’ achievement against National Curriculum levels. Team meetings, and opportunities to observe teachers in other schools, enable them to discuss and understand good practice. The partnership is currently helping to secure more good teaching. Better training for

p.2

Main findings

teaching assistants is strengthening their contribution in lessons. Teachers say that they are planning more effectively with teaching assistants. Senior leaders have revised the lesson observation scheme to ensure there is a stronger focus on pupils’ progress.

p.2

Main findings

Work on improving behaviour is starting to have a positive impact. More effective rewards and sanctions are being used. For example, pupils say that receiving ‘golden tickets’ motivates them to behave well at all times. The behaviour policy has been revised and shared with parents. A meeting has been held with parents to reinforce the school’s expected standard of behaviour and to gain support. Staff, including midday supervisors, have received training to improve their level of vigilance, and to ensure that they take a consistent line with any poor behaviour. School displays are beginning to celebrate pupils’ good behaviour. The result of these recent measures has seen the number of lunchtime detentions significantly fall during June.

p.2

Main findings

Members of the governing body have a good understanding of how well the school is improving. The new monitoring committee has begun to take an in-depth look at each aspect of the school’s action plan. This is starting to provide good checks on the school’s performance. Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.2

Main findings

 sharpen the improvement plan so that the impact of actions, relevant milestones and success criteria can be fully measured. More precise time frames and outcomes are required that reflect a sense of urgency.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The local authority has provided effective support and scrutiny to ensure that school leaders maintain a realistic view of the progress they are making. There is planned support to improve teaching. The diocese is soundly reviewing the work of the school. The relatively new partnership is starting to build the confidence of teachers, and enable them to assess their practice more effectively.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Southwark Diocese and the Director of Children’s Services for Greenwich. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion