Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 18 Jul 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Carmen Rodney

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Carmen Rodney

  • Postcode verified

    N18 2TL

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+33Mostly positivemore positive than 41% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisevery welloutstandingsupportivestrengthseffectivetimely
Criticismweaknesses

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
760
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mrs Heather Knightley Headteacher St John and St James CofE Primary School Grove Street London N18 2TL

p.1

James Church of England Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 28 June 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

James Church of England Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in February 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I held meetings with you, other senior and middle leaders, a few pupils, the Chair of the Governing Body, a representative of the local authority, and a member of the London Diocesan Board to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. The following documents were scrutinised: the school improvement plan, pupils’ work, monitoring files on teaching and assessment records, and information on performance management.

p.1

Context

Following the section 5 inspection, two members of staff have resigned, including the deputy headteacher. The assistant headteacher and phase leaders have taken on additional responsibilities prior to the restructuring of the senior leadership team in September 2013. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com

p.1

Main findings

You and your senior leaders, including the governing body and London Diocesan Board, and other staff readily accepted the inspection judgement. The collective response to addressing the weaknesses has been used to produce a well-considered and timely action plan. This underpins the drive to changing the culture of the school. Complacency has been replaced by a passion and determination to drive school improvement. This is evident in a sharp focus on developing the quality of teaching and a systematic approach to tracking pupils’ progress. You have stepped up expectations; judgements on teaching are harsher and where necessary, staff have moved on. Conversely, you and senior leaders are proving a range of good quality support and opportunities for staff to develop their practices. This includes working in quartets, using research ideas and teaching reviews. Findings are being put to good use to develop teaching and assessment practices, particularly in

p.2

Main findings

numeracy and literacy. However, while your analysis of assessment information considers some categories of pupils, ethnicity is not covered. There is good use of weekly and monthly action plans and of pupil assessment meetings to monitor progress and provide targeted support for groups and individual pupils. The pace of change is fast and staff are supportive. You all realise that the full impact of the work is still to be seen. Nevertheless, within a short time, evidence shows that pupils are beginning to make much better progress in both literacy and numeracy. For instance, improvement in teaching phonics (the sound of letters) is increasing all aspects of literacy. There is also more emphasis on developing basic numeracy skills.

p.2

Main findings

The governing body know the school’s strengths and weaknesses. Members have shrewdly audited their skills and are increasing their capacity to hold staff to account. Good links with phase leaders are contributing to governors gathering first hand evidence, and their training on assessment information is leading to them challenge staff more rigorously about pupils’ progress.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.2

Main findings

 raise achievement further by building on and consolidating initiatives to strengthen the teaching of literacy and numeracy in all subjects  ensure expectations are suitably high for the more able pupils so they can achieve the highest level at the end of each key stage.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

You and the senior leaders are responding very well to the training, review findings and support provided by the local authority, including the consultant. This is increasing your capacity to drive improvement. For example assessment information on pupils’ progress is sharpening practices and are directly linked to the training provided. Furthermore, visits to good and outstanding schools are increasingly helping staff to realise that your pupils can excel.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Enfield, and the London Diocese.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion