Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 18 Jul 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Adrian Guy

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Adrian Guy

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+11Mostly positivemore positive than 30% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiverigorousimprovedgood progressaccuratemake good progressstrongconsistently
Criticismweaknessesseriousfalling behindnot alwaysgapstoo manynot effectiveabsence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings630w+28
  • Leadership312w−9
  • What needs to improve449w−5

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,388
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
24 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 44%Leadership 22%What needs to improve 32%About the inspection 2%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566 857 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: jkinsman@cfbt.com

p.1

Mrs Colleen Jackson Headteacher Sandal Primary School West Lane Baildon Shipley West Yorkshire BD17 5DH

p.1

Serious weaknesses monitoring inspection of Sandal Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 27 June 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and findings of the inspection. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school's most recent monitoring inspection.

p.1

Serious weaknesses monitoring inspection of Sandal Primary School

The inspection was the second monitoring inspection since the school was judged as having serious weaknesses following the section 5 inspection which took place in January 2013. The monitoring inspection report is attached.

p.1

Serious weaknesses monitoring inspection of Sandal Primary School

Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Serious weaknesses monitoring inspection of Sandal Primary School

The school is making reasonable progress towards the removal of the serious weaknesses designation.

p.1

Serious weaknesses monitoring inspection of Sandal Primary School

This letter and monitoring inspection report will be published on the Ofsted website. I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body and the Strategic Director – Children’s Services for Bradford.

p.1

January 2013

 Improve the quality of teaching in mathematics in Years 1 to 6, so that it is at least good by ensuring that:  work is closely matched to pupils’ needs so that all are able to make consistently good progress  more effective use is made of lesson time to enable pupils to learn quickly  pupils are given precise information about how they can improve  help from support staff is always of good quality.  Raise achievement in mathematics by ensuring that:  teachers receive training to enable them to have a good understanding of how to teach mathematics and develop pupils’ numeracy skills in other subjects  pupils are given significantly more opportunities to use and apply their mathematical skills to solve problems and to understand the relevance of mathematics to everyday life  teachers’ assessments of pupils’ attainment in mathematics are accurate so that pupils who are falling behind in their learning can be quickly identified and

p.2

January 2013

supported  pupils who find learning more difficult and those whose circumstances make them more vulnerable are given additional, good quality help to ensure that they make good progress.

p.2

January 2013

 Improve the quality of leadership, management and governance by ensuring that:  checks on the quality of teaching in mathematics are more rigorous and accurate  there is strong and effective leadership of mathematics  the school’s evaluation of its performance is more accurate and improvement plans are more sharply focused on raising pupils’ achievement and improving the quality of teaching in mathematics.

p.2

Evidence

During my inspection I observed teaching and learning in Years 1 to 5 in the school. All of these observations were conducted jointly with the executive headteacher and the headteacher designate. I scrutinised documents relating to the school’s work and governance and, together with the acting deputy, I scrutinised a sample of pupils’ mathematics books. I met with senior leaders, subject leaders in mathematics, the Chair of the Governing Body and a parent governor and a representative of the local authority. I also observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and talked to pupils informally during the inspection.

p.3

Context

Since my last visit, The headteacher has retired, the deputy headteacher has become the acting head of school, the assistant headteacher has become the acting deputy, a senior teacher has become acting assistant headteacher. The school has appointed a headteacher who takes up post in September 2013 but is already working in school alongside the executive headteacher. Two teachers have resigned and are leaving at the end of the summer term and two teachers are currently on long-term absence. A new local authority governor has joined the governing body which now has its full complement of governors.

p.3

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

Senior leaders have been diligent in putting into place systems and structures to check the work of the school. They have a realistic view of what has been achieved and what improvements are still required. There are more frequent observations of the quality of teaching and careful moderation of assessment information in partnership with the local authority. Pupils’ work is checked against the levels awarded by teachers and robust discussions take place where there are inaccuracies. All leaders receive training and support through partnerships with the local authority and the partner school led by the executive headteacher. This is leading to a clearer understanding of their roles and responsibilities. However, the roles and accountability of middle leaders are still at an early stage of development and the extent to which they are held accountable for driving improvements needs further development.

p.3

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

Individual programmes of support have been put in place to support teaching and this is beginning to show some improvement in the quality of teaching observed. Nevertheless, leaders are under no illusion that there is still further to go until teaching is of the quality and consistency required for it to be good.

p.3

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

In March 2012, an audit of the governing body found weaknesses in the recording of information and the levels of attendance at training necessary for governors to fulfil their roles. The governors had drafted an action plan to tackle these issues. They have ensured that meetings are recorded more accurately and have appointed a clerk for this purpose. They have established two new committees and are now better placed to oversee the improvements in the school. Opportunities to monitor the work of the school for themselves have proved challenging but they now have a clearer view of how this can be achieved. They accept there is more to be done to ensure that they hold all leaders to account.

p.3

Strengths in the school's approaches to securing improvement:

 Current data indicate that pupils’ attainment in mathematics has improved this year and nearly all pupils in Year 6 have made expected progress and many have made better progress.

p.4

Strengths in the school's approaches to securing improvement:

 In lessons pupils are more active in their learning and they are being given more interesting things to do. There has been a whole-school focus on ensuring that pupils develop the skills to use and apply their mathematical understanding. Time has been dedicated to this; however, leaders are right in their view that this now needs to be embedded as a feature of everyday practice within mathematics lessons.

p.4

Strengths in the school's approaches to securing improvement:

 Work to secure teachers’ assessment of pupils’ work has improved. Pupils are involved in keeping track of what they can do. Work with the partner school and training in assessing pupils’ progress has led to greater accuracy in teachers’ assessments.

p.4

Strengths in the school's approaches to securing improvement:

 Teachers have worked with the partner school in introducing a personal skills record for each pupil. Support for teachers to improve aspects of teaching is in place. Leaders know there is more to do to ensure teachers’ understanding of effective teaching is developed to the required level.

p.4

Weaknesses in the school's approaches to securing improvement:

 There remain weaknesses in teachers’ subject knowledge. As a result, some of the work pupils are given does not always build precisely on what pupils have learned or tackle gaps and misconceptions in their learning.

p.4

Weaknesses in the school's approaches to securing improvement:

 The marking of pupils’ work is improving across the school. However, scrutiny of a sample of pupils’ work showed that pupils do not have opportunities to respond to or address the feedback they are now given. In too many cases the teachers’ comments are not making an effective contribution to pupils’ better progress.

p.4

Weaknesses in the school's approaches to securing improvement:

 Although pupils are more engaged through practical tasks and activities, leaders are clear that there needs to be more focus on ensuring that this is precisely matched to pupils’ individual needs. For example, in a lesson involving measuring, the more complex activity required pupils to measure simpler and shorter distances and the simpler task required pupils to measure trickier longer distances. While the school has worked on this aspect of teaching, there are still examples of lessons where all pupils are given the same activity without consideration of their different learning needs.

p.4

External support

The school has benefited from a range of support from the local authority and the partnership with a local school. In particular, the leadership of the executive headteacher has been instrumental in bringing about improvements to the organisation of lessons and systems for monitoring the quality of teaching. Moderation from local authority officers has confirmed the security of teachers’ externally reported assessments and rigorous challenge has been given to governors through an external audit of the governing body.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion