Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Southwood Primary School
Summary
Jennifer Barker (lead), Bimla Thakur, Diana Shepherd
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
27 Jun 2013
- Inspectors verified
Bimla Thakur, Diana Shepherd, Jennifer Barker
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Postcode verified
RM9 5LT
- Name on report verified
Southwood Primary School
- URN verified
131845
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2006.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This is a calm and orderly school where relationships flourish and pupils enjoy friendships across many cultures. p.5
- This is improved through a range of support strategies, including effective programmes of support, links to any difficulties with learning and has resulted in improved behaviour for these pupils over time. p.5
- Behaviour is usually good in lessons and there are occasions when it is outstanding when pupils are actively involved in their learning or during opportunities for independent work. p.5
- The school is effective in promoting positive relationships and ensuring there is no discrimination. p.5
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The quality of teaching and pupils’ progress is not good enough in Key Stage 2. p.1
- Pupils do not make enough progress in writing and pupils are not challenged well enough in lessons, particularly those who are high achievers. p.1
- Teachers do not always use the good assessment information to plan activities and resources to ensure that work is not too hard or too easy and that pupils progress to the next level. p.1
- Marking is inconsistent across the school and comments from teachers are not always linked to pupils’ targets. p.1
- Pupils do not have opportunities to respond to teachers’ comments and correct their mistakes. p.1
- Some parents and carers raised concerns about communication with the school and issues are not always followed up quickly enough. p.1
- Leadership and management require improvement because leaders, managers and governors have not ensured that high standards in teaching and pupils’ achievement have been maintained. p.1
- Action planning is not sharp enough and monitoring strategies are not linked closely enough to improving teaching and the progress of pupils. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 2,379
- shorter than usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Southwood Primary School Keppel Road, Dagenham, RM9 5LT
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Good 2 This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils requires improvement 3 Quality of teaching requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils are good 2 Leadership and management requires improvement 3
p.1
This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because:
The quality of teaching and pupils’ progress is not good enough in Key Stage 2. Pupils do not make enough progress in writing and pupils are not challenged well enough in lessons, particularly those who are high achievers. Teachers do not always use the good assessment information to plan activities and resources to ensure that work is not too hard or too easy and that pupils progress to the next level. Marking is inconsistent across the school and comments from teachers are not always linked to pupils’ targets. Pupils do not have opportunities to respond to teachers’ comments and correct their mistakes. Some parents and carers raised concerns about communication with the school and issues are not always followed up quickly enough. Leadership and management require improvement because leaders, managers and governors have not ensured that high standards in teaching and pupils’ achievement have been maintained.
p.1
This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because:
Action planning is not sharp enough and monitoring strategies are not linked closely enough to improving teaching and the progress of pupils. Governors are unclear about their roles in monitoring and evaluating the school’s work and holding leaders to account for improvements.
p.1
The school has the following strengths:
Standards at Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2 are broadly average. Tracking systems are effective in identifying groups at risk of falling behind. These show some accelerated progress during the current school year and more pupils expected to reach the higher levels in mathematics. Pupils are courteous and polite, and behaviour in lessons and around the school is good. They enjoy their lessons, like their teachers and particularly value their friendships. Pupils make a good start at the school in the Early Years Foundation Stage through the range of activities, teaching and adult-led development of language.
p.1
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed 23 lessons, with some seen jointly with members of the senior leadership team. In addition, the inspection team made shorter visits to lessons to focus on specific aspects. Discussions were held with the headteacher, as well as other leaders and managers, members of the governing body, an officer from the local authority and pupils. The inspection team looked at the school’s website and a range of documents including the school’s evaluation and development plan, minutes of meetings of the governing body, safeguarding arrangements and work in pupils’ books. They also heard pupils read. Inspectors took account of the views of parents and carers at the beginning and end of the school day, the school’s own survey as well as those of the 23 parents and carers who responded to the online questionnaire, Parent View.
p.2
Inspection team
Jennifer Barker, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Bimla Thakur Additional Inspector Diana Shepherd Additional Inspector
p.2
Information about this school
The school is much larger than the average-sized primary school. There are three forms of entry in Reception and Year 1 and the school will expand to three forms of entry as these classes move up the school. The school has been through some difficulties with staffing. A new deputy headteacher started at the school in April 2013. The proportion of pupils eligible for pupil premium funding, which provides additional resources for children looked after by the local authority, pupils known to be eligible for free school meals and children of service families, is well above average. There are no children who come from service families in the school. The proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is well above average, as is the proportion from minority ethnic backgrounds. The proportion of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs supported through school action is below the national average. The proportion of pupils supported at school action
p.3
Information about this school
plus or with a statement of special educational needs is around the national average. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress. There have been a number of changes to the governing body including a new Chair of the Governing Body who commenced in 2012.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve teaching, particularly in Key Stage 2, so that pupils make good progress, and achievement rises, particularly in writing, by ensuring that: teachers use assessment information to plan activities and resources that involve and challenge all pupils, especially those who are higher achieving, to move on quickly in their learning there is a range of strategies teachers use to assess learning during lessons, share pupils’ work and modify tasks to ensure pupils make fast progress the marking policy is consistently used across the school, comments are linked to pupils’ targets and there are opportunities for pupils to respond, correct their mistakes and improve their work teachers plan more regular opportunities for pupils to use and develop their writing. Widen the range of opportunities to engage with parents and carers, so that any concerns can be addressed at an earlier stage. Improve leadership and management by ensuring that development plans have clear priorities
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
that are linked to teaching and the progress of pupils, best practice is shared and the roles of leaders and governors in monitoring and evaluation are clear. An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and governance may be improved.
p.3
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
Achievement across all years in Key Stage 2 is not good enough and so pupils do not build on the progress they make in the Early Years Foundation Stage and in Key Stage 1. Standards at the end of Year 6 have remained at average levels over the last three years. Children enter the school with skills and knowledge at below the levels expected for their age. By the time they reach the end of Key Stage 1 attainment is broadly average. However, overall standards in writing are lower than in reading and mathematics throughout the school. High achieving pupils are not challenged well enough in lessons and there are too few regular opportunities for pupils to develop and practise their writing skills. Lower achieving pupils sometimes have work that is too hard and so resources and activities are not always effective in ensuring these pupils make better progress in lessons. Phonics (the sounds that letters make) is successfully taught from when pupils enter the school
p.4
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
in the Early Years Foundation Stage and progress in reading is accelerating throughout the school. However, pupils at the early stages of reading do not always apply their skills in order to work out unknown words because sometimes the text is too hard for them. As pupils become more fluent in reading, they increasingly enjoy a wide range of books and develop good understanding and improved development of vocabulary. Pupils were enthusiastic about their reading and as one pupil said, describing her understanding of ideas implicit in the text, ‘I’m good at reading between the lines.’ Pupils who enter the school at the early stages of learning English make faster progress, particularly in the Early Years Foundation Stage where the development of language is linked well to the range of adult-led activities indoors and outside. Overall, the progress of ethnic minorities is similar to that of others in the school and no group of pupils lags behind others.
p.4
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
Pupils who are known to be eligible for free school meals and those who are looked after have a range of additional support provided through the additional pupil premium funding. In 2012, this group were about a term behind others in English and two terms behind in mathematics compared to pupils nationally. However, current assessment tracking information shows that these pupils have made better progress in mathematics this year and the gap is narrowing. Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs are making better progress than their peers with a range of well-targeted additional programmes which are well monitored. However, teachers do not always plan activities and use and adapt resources so that these pupils, especially those identified at school action, understand what they have to do to make effective progress in lessons. There is more to be done to ensure equality of opportunity for pupils’
p.4
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
learning and for all groups of pupils to make good progress in the school.
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
The quality of teaching is inconsistent across the school. Consequently, not enough pupils make good progress in lessons, particularly in Key Stage 2. Teachers do not use the increasingly useful assessment information in order to plan appropriate tasks and activities that challenge the full range of pupils to move to the next level. In addition, too much teaching is over-directed by teachers so more-able pupils find these sessions too easy and the less able find them too hard and this slows progress. There are too few strategies to assess pupils’ learning during lessons, clarify misunderstandings and modify tasks so that all pupils, and in particular the higher achievers, are fully challenged and tasks are adapted for less-able pupils. Teachers mark work regularly, but the impact of this in raising achievement is not always effective. This is because teachers’ comments are not always linked to pupils’ targets and next
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
steps, showing what they have done well and next steps for improvement. Pupils do not have enough opportunities to respond to teachers’ marking, correct mistakes and practise their skills. However, where pupils are involved in lessons they make good progress, for instance in a lesson where pupils were reading the book, Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, and were actively involved in collaborating on news reports and presenting them to each other. Pupils thoroughly enjoy this approach, and said how much they like working together as they get more ideas and it makes English even better. This also contributes to them developing a love of reading, shown in the way were keen to talk about this and other books they were reading. Teaching in the Early Years Foundation Stage is particularly strong and this has greatly improved since the previous inspection. The range of activities in and outside the classroom ensures that
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
children’s skills are developed well. Practical activities, such as preparing and having a picnic, make good links across all areas of learning and develop children’s confidence and social skills well. Opportunities, for example, to make music to illustrate a story develop effective listening and children’s literacy skills. These activities ensure pupils make a good start to their education.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
This is a calm and orderly school where relationships flourish and pupils enjoy friendships across many cultures. These enrich their experience. Pupils like the range of activities at lunchtimes and after school and the many opportunities for trips. They are polite and courteous to adults and helpful to visitors and support each other well. Pupils like their lessons, enjoy discussing their work with each other and value each other’s views and opinions. Behaviour is usually good in lessons and there are occasions when it is outstanding when pupils are actively involved in their learning or during opportunities for independent work. However, behaviour is not outstanding overall as opportunities for this involvement in their learning in lessons are limited. The majority of parents and carers say their children are happy and safe. Some parents and carers are concerned about bullying and behaviour. However, pupils say that this is rare and are
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
confident staff will follow up on any concerns they have. School records confirm pupils’ views are accurate. They understand different kinds of bullying, including name calling, physical contact and racism, which is rare. They know how to keep safe when using phones or the internet and these areas are taught well through personal, social and health education. The school is effective in promoting positive relationships and ensuring there is no discrimination. The school works well with families and gives better life chances for pupils through improving their attendance, which is average overall. A very few pupils display challenging behaviour. This is improved through a range of support strategies, including effective programmes of support, links to any difficulties with learning and has resulted in improved behaviour for these pupils over time.
p.5
The leadership and management require improvement
Leadership and management require improvement because they have not ensured that high standards of teaching and achievement have been maintained. Development planning is too broad and not focused well enough on key priorities for improving teaching. Consequently, strategies for monitoring and evaluation are not robust enough and monitoring by leaders and governors is not effective enough in raising achievement across the school, for instance through more effective marking of pupils’ work. Parents and carers are concerned about some aspects of the school. They do not feel their concerns are always followed up through the school’s current procedures and some issues are not picked up early enough. However, parents and carers commented on the excellent relationships with staff in the Early Years Foundation Stage. Performance management is a strength of the school and salary progression is linked to the
p.5
The leadership and management require improvement
progress of pupils. Teachers are supported, through mentoring and peer observations, and this has resulted in improvements in teaching for those at an early stage of their career. Underperformance is not tolerated and the local authority supports the school well when hard decisions have to be made to ensure the correct processes are followed. The curriculum is a strength of the school, with pupils having a range of opportunities to use and apply their skills in English and mathematics. However, teachers do not always plan regular opportunities for writing during lessons so that pupils are able to practise and improve their skills. Trips and visits are linked well to pupils’ work. Areas such as personal, social and health education develop pupils’ understanding of keeping healthy and are linked to recycling issues through science. The school promotes the development of all aspects of the spiritual, moral, social and cultural of
p.5
The leadership and management require improvement
pupils effectively. Opportunities to reflect on feelings by responding to different situations, the development of music throughout the school as well as trips and visits and opportunities to take responsibility develop their understanding in all these areas. The governance of the school: The governing body is in the process of change, with a number of new governors. The Chair of the Governing Body took up her post in the autumn term, 2012. Their commitment to the school is very strong, particularly those who are parents and carers. Governors bring an increasing number of skills to their role and are keen to support and challenge the school. Nevertheless, roles and responsibilities are not clear and they do not have a strategic view in order to move the school forward, particularly in regard to monitoring and evaluation to ensure teaching and pupils’ achievement improve. Governors ensure that performance
p.6
The leadership and management require improvement
management is effective and weaknesses in teaching are not tolerated. They receive updates on the quality of teaching in the school and are aware of where underperformance has been tackled and how teachers who teach well are rewarded. The committee responsible for standards liaises effectively with the finance committee so that spending is linked to improving outcomes for pupils. They receive updates on data from the headteacher and ensure that additional funding for the pupil premium is focused on raising achievement and improving life chances for pupils known to be eligible for free school meals and those who are looked after. They ensure that statutory duties are carried out effectively and the governor with responsibility for safeguarding makes regular visits to the school ensuring that all aspects of this are met.
p.6
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.7
School details
Unique reference number 131845 Local authority Barking and Dagenham Inspection number 412277
p.8
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 3−11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 511 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Eirlys Gilbert Headteacher Margaret Pease Date of previous school inspection 24−25 November 2009 Telephone number 020 8270 4915 Fax number 020 8270 4914 Email address office@southwood.bardaglea.org.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.9
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.9
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.9
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion