Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
St Mary's CofE School, TruroOfsted inspection, 26 Jun 2013
Ofsted inspected St Mary's CofE School, Truro on 26 Jun 2013, led by John Cavill. The overall judgement was Requires improvement. Ofsted published the report on 17 Jul 2013. Source: Ofsted (Open Government Licence v3).
Summary
John Cavill (lead), David Nebesnuick
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
26 Jun 2013
- Inspectors verified
David Nebesnuick, John Cavill
- Leadership and management AI-checked
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Satisfactory
- Postcode verified
TR1 3RJ
- Name on report verified
St Mary’s Church of England School, Truro
- URN verified
111990
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2007.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Most pupils’ progress in reading and writing has improved strongly following a whole- school focus and a successful teaching programme on phonics (linking letters with the sounds they make). p.1
- They attend regularly, are happy and have positive attitudes to learning, especially when the work is engaging and challenging. p.5
- They enjoy their lessons, are respectful, and their attendance is above average. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Some parents, carers and pupils who were spoken to by an inspector talked about some occasional incidents of unacceptable behaviour outside at lunchtime. p.5
- This is usually because the work provided by the teacher is not appropriately demanding, but any unacceptable behaviour is quickly identified and corrected by teachers. p.5
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The progress made by disabled pupils and those with special educational needs is not good enough. p.1
- The gap in achievement between them and their peers, in English and mathematics, is not being closed effectively enough. p.1
- Teachers do not always use information on pupils’ progress to plan tasks to meet their needs, or make full use of additional adults to support pupils’ learning in lessons. p.1
- Teachers do not always ensure that pupils’ work is marked accurately. p.1
- As a result, when pupils use teachers’ comments to review and improve their work it leads to some misunderstanding. p.1
- Programmes of work, especially in English and mathematics, do not ensure that pupils who are eligible for pupil premium funding achieve well. p.1
- The programmes are not effective and restrict pupils’ ability to make accelerated progress. p.1
- Leaders do not monitor closely enough how the additional funding provided to support pupils is used, and the effect it is having on p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 2,152
- shorter than usual (typical 2803)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 20%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
St Mary’s Church of England School, Truro Higher Trehaverne, Truro, TR1 3RJ
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Requires improvement 3
p.1
This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because:
The progress made by disabled pupils and those with special educational needs is not good enough. The gap in achievement between them and their peers, in English and mathematics, is not being closed effectively enough. Teachers do not always use information on pupils’ progress to plan tasks to meet their needs, or make full use of additional adults to support pupils’ learning in lessons. Teachers do not always ensure that pupils’ work is marked accurately. As a result, when pupils use teachers’ comments to review and improve their work it leads to some misunderstanding. Programmes of work, especially in English and mathematics, do not ensure that pupils who are eligible for pupil premium funding achieve well. The programmes are not effective and restrict pupils’ ability to make accelerated progress. Leaders do not monitor closely enough how the additional funding provided to support pupils is used, and the effect it is having on
p.1
The school has the following strengths:
The majority of pupils make good progress at the school. This leads to above-average attainment in English and mathematics by the time they leave school at the end of Year 6. Most pupils’ progress in reading and writing has improved strongly following a whole- school focus and a successful teaching programme on phonics (linking letters with the sounds they make). Pupils’ attitudes towards their learning are good. They enjoy their lessons, are respectful, and their attendance is above average. They say they feel safe in school. The school promotes pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development well, through the work pupils do in lessons and in the wide range of additional activities on offer, including residential visits.
p.1
Information about this inspection
Inspectors visited 13 lessons, observing seven teachers. Inspectors also undertook a learning walk to inspect the teaching of phonics.The headteacher joined inspectors for a number of observations. Inspectors listened to pupils read and looked at examples of pupils’ work to find out how well they learn, including the work of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs. Discussions were held with the headteacher, staff, pupils, the Chair of the Governing Body and a representative from the local authority. Inspectors observed the school’s work and looked at a range of documents, including school improvement plans, priorities for development, achievement information and documents relating to the safeguarding of children. Inspectors took account of the 42 responses to the online Parent View survey and the 14 responses to the staff questionnaire during the inspection. Two parents and carers forwarded
p.2
Inspection team
John Cavill, Lead inspector Additional Inspector David Nebesnuick Additional Inspector
p.2
Information about this school
St Mary’s is a smaller-than-average-sized primary school. The Early Years Foundation Stage comprises just one Reception class. The school does not have a nursery. Almost all pupils are White British, with very few pupils from different ethnic heritages. The proportion of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs supported through school action is average. The proportion of pupils supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is also average. The proportion of pupils eligible for the pupil premium (additional funding for pupils known to be eligible for free school meals, those who are looked after by the local authority and children from armed-service families) is below average. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress. The school manages a breakfast and an after-school club for the pupils.
p.3
Information about this school
The school does not provide access to any alternative or specialist provision.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of teaching to good or better, in order to raise achievement generally, by ensuring that: when marking pupils’ work teachers check thoroughly for mistakes and misconceptions so that pupils are able to use this information to review and improve their work additional adults are used in classes more effectively to support learning and accelerate pupils’ progress. Close the gap in achievement between disabled pupils, those who have special educational needs and those supported by pupil premium funding, with those of their peers by: accelerating their progress in English and mathematics making sure that teachers make better use of information about their progress to plan lessons to better meet these pupils’ needs. Improve leadership and management by monitoring more closely the use and impact of pupil premium funding to ensure it is properly directed at supporting pupils who are eligible for free
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
school meals, so that the tasks they are given enable them to make faster progress, especially in English and mathematics.
p.3
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
Progress made by disabled pupils, those with special educational needs and those who are supported by pupil premium funding is not good enough in English or mathematics. This is because the quality of teaching provided for these pupils is not focused sufficiently closely to meet their needs. Consequently their progress is not accelerating quickly enough to close the gap in achievement between them and other pupils at the school. Since the previous inspection too few pupils have exceeded the expected rate of progress by the end of Key Stage 2. This has been more noticeable in English, and especially in reading. However, following the programme to improve achievement in reading across the school, progress data at the school indicate that this is likely to improve rapidly this year. The school has successfully introduced a phonics programme to support the teaching of reading and writing. Along with the whole-school focus on improving English over the last two years, this
p.4
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
has improved achievement for the majority of pupils, who are now making good progress in reading and writing. Attainment in reading is now above average both at the end of Key Stage 1 and by the time pupils leave the school in Year 6. When children join Reception their skills and knowledge are generally similar to what would normally be expected for their age. Most children respond well to the interesting learning activities they are given and make good progress within the Early Years Foundation Stage. As a result they enter Key Stage 1 with above-expected levels of skill and knowledge. By the end of Key Stage 2, the attainment of most pupils is above average in English and mathematics. This ensures they are well prepared to move onto the next stage of their education. Pupil premium funding is not being used effectively enough to accelerate the progress of pupils in receipt of it to close the gap in their achievement successfully. As a result, they are
p.4
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
approximately one year behind the standards reached by their classmates in both English and mathematics.
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
Teaching is not always focused on meeting the needs of all pupils. Some groups of pupils, especially those who are disadvantaged, are not making enough progress because teaching is not always accurately matched to their individual needs. This limits their achievement over time and restricts their ability to catch up with their peers. Most groups of pupils make better progress because teaching is good enough to meet their needs well. Work in lessons is appropriately set, and pupils of similar ability work together well in their groups. Teachers have high expectations of behaviour in lessons and of what most pupils are able to learn, challenging them well to make good progress. This results in lessons that are productive and which encourage pupils to think and learn by themselves. In the better lessons, additional adults are used well to support learning. During a Year 1 mathematics lesson where pupils were solving word-problems on a pirate theme, some pupils
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
extended the task successfully using doubling because the teaching assistant challenged their leaning well. However, this is not always the case, and additional adults too often undertake time-consuming administration tasks rather than supporting pupils to accelerate their learning. Teachers mark pupils’ work regularly, and provide some ‘next steps’ to help the pupils to improve their work. Pupils report that this helps them, and they usually make any required alterations. However, teachers do not pay enough attention to checking everything that is incorrect and challenging any misconceptions. For example, in a Year 6 literacy book, the teacher indicated that the pupil had included a ‘play on words’ in the work when clearly they had not. In other years, teachers ticked all boxes on ‘learning ladders’ and then wrote comments that said aspects were missing, giving pupils mixed messages about what is good or correct.
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
Teaching in the Early Years Foundation Stage is, for most pupils, effective, and ensures they make good progress. Teachers make effective use of the outside and inside spaces, using resources well to promote children’s development towards the early learning goals.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Pupils are proud of their school. They attend regularly, are happy and have positive attitudes to learning, especially when the work is engaging and challenging. Behaviour around the school is good and pupils demonstrate respect for each other, their teachers and other adults at the school. They understand how to keep themselves safe, including when using the internet. Pupils have a good understanding of the different forms of bullying, including emotional, physical and cyber bullying. Some parents, carers and pupils who were spoken to by an inspector talked about some occasional incidents of unacceptable behaviour outside at lunchtime. However, pupils were quick to say that the adults at the school would quickly resolve any incidents or problems they may have. Visits to the playground during the inspection confirmed that behaviour outside is good. In most lessons behaviour is good. However, very occasionally there is some inappropriate
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
behaviour such as chatting to each other or losing interest in the task. This is usually because the work provided by the teacher is not appropriately demanding, but any unacceptable behaviour is quickly identified and corrected by teachers. Most parents and carers who responded to the questionnaire or spoke to an inspector were satisfied about the way that the school cares for and looks after their children. All pupils, including those in the Early Years Foundation Stage, say they feel safe and very secure. Attendance is above the national average and pupils are keen to get to school and into lessons. Allowing pupils to arrive at school early into classrooms ensures a punctual start to the school day and reflects the importance the school places on regular attendance. Some pupils attend the breakfast club, which provides a good start to school, and the after-school club looks after pupils well.
p.5
The leadership and management require improvement
The headteacher and governors have a clear understanding of the issues relating to the quality of teaching and pupils’ achievement at the school. However, they are not monitoring the effect that teaching is having on all pupils closely enough, and consequently not all pupils are making sufficient progress and achieving well. This is particularly the case for disadvantaged groups of pupils. Leaders have made use of pupil premium funding to provide additional support for these pupils. However, this has not been monitored closely enough to ensure that it is having the desired effect to accelerate pupils’ progress and close their gap in achievement. The curriculum, especially for English and mathematics, is not planned well enough to enable all pupils to make good progress. It provides well for most pupils with work that is appropriate and challenges them to do well. However, for some pupils, the tasks that are set do not fully meet
p.5
The leadership and management require improvement
their individual needs and, as a result, they make slower progress and are not assured of reaching levels of attainment similar to their peers’. Leaders and governors have successfully addressed all areas of concern in the previous inspection. They have secured some improved teaching, which has led to improved achievement in reading, writing and mathematics for most groups of pupils. Pupils’ attendance has risen and is now above average. These improvements indicate capacity to sustain further improvement. The headteacher, supported by governors, has managed the performance of teachers well, and has challenged them to improve their teaching and leadership responsibilities. Where there is a lack of evidence that teachers on higher pay have reached their performance target, they are not routinely awarded a further pay rise. Leaders share a determination to avoid discrimination and ensure equality of opportunity for all.
p.5
The leadership and management require improvement
There is still more to do on this by ensuring that any gaps in achievement between different groups of pupils are eliminated. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is provided for very well through the curriculum and other activities, such as assemblies and visits. Encouraging pupils to work together, such as in the gardening club, helps them to develop their understanding of rural skills while working together developing their social skills. The local authority provides this school with some light touch support. The governance of the school: Governors are committed, support the school well, and undertake training to improve their effectiveness. They have a clear understanding of the need to support the headteacher in her quest to improve and challenge the performance of teachers in their teaching as well as in their leadership roles. Governors ensure that the link between performance and salary
p.6
The leadership and management require improvement
progression is challenged effectively. They monitor how well pupils are doing at the school and evaluate the impact of developments within the improvement plan on pupils’ achievement. They check how well their school performs compared with others nationally to seek maximum impact on the outcomes for pupils. Governors monitor funding to the school well, and they assess the impact of initiatives as compared to the cost. They are clear about the need to use the pupil premium funding to improve the outcomes for pupils. They ensure that safeguarding requirements are met.
p.6
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.7
School details
Unique reference number 111990 Local authority Cornwall Inspection number 401222
p.8
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 207 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Claire Pearne Headteacher Dianne Jones Date of previous school inspection 26–27 April 2010 Telephone number 01872 276689 Fax number 01872 321283 Email address head@st-marys-truro.cornwall.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.9
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.9
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.9
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion