Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Mark Lindfield
- Postcode verified
EX1 2PT
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance12
“The role of the subject leaders for English and mathematics is developing positively.” p.2Records & policies3
“The school has reviewed its marking policy.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 843
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 42, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs Jackie Jackson Ladysmith Junior School Pretoria Road Exeter Devon EX1 2PT
p.1
School
Following my visit to your school on Tuesday 25 June, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in May 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with you, other senior leaders, the governing body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The school improvement plan was evaluated. HMI conducted a learning walk with the headteacher and completed a scrutiny of pupils’ mathematics and English work with senior and subject leaders.
p.1
Context
The school is in the process of federating with Ladysmith Infant school. There have been no other contextual changes since the school was inspected. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5316 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Direct email : Shannyn.sachse @tribalgroup.com
p.1
Main findings
With local authority support, senior leaders have revised the school development plan to address the main areas that require improvement. The plan includes appropriate actions and detailed targets to raise the quality of teaching and learning and strengthen leadership and management. In the short time available since the inspection, the plan has been revised to include a number of actions to raise standards in reading, writing and mathematics. The local authority has deployed literacy and numeracy advisors to work with the school during the autumn term to monitor the school’s progress and produce further action plans to raise standards in English and mathematics. The head has evaluated and reported to governors the progress the school has made in the six weeks since the inspection. These evaluations are more effective where they provide a clear link to the impact of the actions and less helpful when written as a narrative that describes the completion of
p.2
Main findings
The role of the subject leaders for English and mathematics is developing positively. With senior leaders they have drawn up a timetable of events to consider evidence from a range of sources in order to evaluate improvements in the quality of teaching and their impact on pupils’ progress. They have good subject knowledge and have shown a clear understanding of the key priorities required to move the school forward. The headteacher has revised systems to more frequently track pupils’ achievement. Teachers have taken on responsibility for recording and analysing information and data on pupils’ progress. This information has been used effectively to draw up class action plans for target groups of pupils and has helped to raise teachers’ expectations.
p.2
Main findings
The school has reviewed its marking policy. Teachers are now expected to identify and share with pupils the steps they need to take to improve their work. However, scrutiny of pupils’ work shows that marking across the school remains of variable quality and is not being used effectively by all teachers to adjust their planning. Scrutiny of pupils work also showed that tasks are not consistently being differentiated for pupils of different abilities. On occasion the objectives of lessons are too vague and a single objective is presented to the whole class rather than being pitched at different levels for different abilities.
p.2
Main findings
The governing body is clearly motivated and committed to moving the school forward. Governors are aware of the need to gain first-hand evidence of the work of the school. However, they have yet to incorporate specific monitoring events within the school’s monitoring timetable. Governors acknowledge their need for a better understanding of the school’s data on pupils’ attainment and progress and are arranging suitable training. Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.2
Main findings
Leaders and governors ensure that the school development plans and monitoring schedule are integrated and detail an unremitting focus on raising achievement
p.3
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.3
External support
The local authority has revised its procedures to monitor assessment and achievement data in order to more quickly identify schools requiring additional support. They have provided appropriate support for the headteacher and this has resulted in a development plan that addresses the areas identified at the last inspection. In addition, local authority advisors have helped to validate senior leaders’ judgements on the quality of teaching and have supported the school to develop procedures to ensure performance management systems are focused on raising performance.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Devon.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion