Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Burnside Secondary PRU

Inspected 20 Jun 2013 · published 11 Jul 2013 · URN 137328

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

James Bowden (lead), Jackie Blount, Liz Bull

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    20 Jun 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Jackie Blount, James Bowden, Liz Bull

  • Postcode verified

    E4 8YJ

  • Name on report verified

    Burnside Secondary PRU

  • URN verified

    137328

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+47Positivemore positive than 48% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisehighly effectiveoutstandingstrongmake good progresseffectivehigh expectationssuccessfullypositive
Criticismpoorinadequatenot alwaysrequires improvementweaknot yetseriousweaknesses

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1414w+45
  • Leadership641w+43
  • What needs to improve85w+67

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,064
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 43%Leadership 20%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 35%

Full report text

Burnside Secondary PRU Burnside Avenue, London, E4 8YJ

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Not previously inspected This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a good school.  Students make good progress during their time at the school, particularly in English and mathematics. All are prepared well for the next stage of their education or reintegration into mainstream schools.  Year 11 students follow a range of GCSE courses at both sites and achieve well.  Those at Forest Pathway College, whose skills in the English language are weak on entry, make good progress. They follow a range of appropriate courses which enables them to move on to further education at the end of the year.  Key Stage 3 and Year 10 students are reintegrated successfully into mainstream schools and other specialist or alternative provision.  Teaching is good. Planning is effective, there is a good range of resources and work is matched well to students’ abilities.  Students’ behaviour is good and their attitudes to learning are particularly positive in lessons. This is as a result of the school’s high

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

expectations and highly effective management of behaviour.  Students say they feel safe at the school and appreciate the opportunities they are given to help them move on to the next stage of their education.  The senior associate head and his senior staff have a strong focus on improving all aspects of the school’s work in order to make sure that students move successfully to the next stage of their education.  The management committee, led by an experienced chair, has quickly got to grips with the new regulations for this type of school introduced from 1 April 2013, and is implementing these changes effectively.

p.1

It is not yet an outstanding school because

 There is not enough focus, in all lessons, on improving students’ key skills of literacy, numeracy and information and communication technology.  Staff who support learning in lessons are not always effectively deployed.  The management of improvement planning and the analysis and use of information on students’ progress are not being drawn together to provide a full picture across the school.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed 13 lessons, taught by 11 teachers, at both sites, seeing each class at least once. One lesson was also observed at Brooks Farm in Leyton. Five of the lessons were observed jointly with a member of the senior leadership team.  Meetings were held with small groups of Year 9, Year 10 and Year 11 students. Meetings were also held with the senior associate head, members of the senior leadership team, others with posts of responsibility, the chair of the management committee, the safeguarding officer who also sits on the management committee, and the executive head of the Waltham Forest Pupil Referral Units and Alternative Provision.  The lead inspector took account of three responses to the on-line questionnaire (Parent View), the school’s own recent parental questionnaire, and 35 responses to the staff questionnaire. In addition, a small number of parents from Forest Pathway College phoned the inspection service

p.2

Information about this inspection

provider to submit their views and a carer had a discussion with one of the team inspectors.  The inspectors observed the school’s practice and looked at a range of documentation, including the school’s checks on how well it is doing and its improvement planning, information on students’ progress, documents used by senior leaders to check the school’s work, management committee documentation, and records relating to attendance, behaviour and safeguarding.

p.2

Inspection team

James Bowden, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Jackie Blount Additional Inspector Liz Bull Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 The school, was formed in September 2011 as a result of the amalgamation of the Burnside Key Stage 3 PRU, the local authority’s Key Stage 4 PRU and the Forest Pathway College, which was part of the local authority’s alternative provision for Year 11 students. Overseen by the executive head of the local authority’s pupil referral units and alternative provision, the school is lead and managed by a senior associate headteacher.  At the Burnside site, the school educates Key Stages 3 and 4 students who have been permanently excluded, or are at risk of permanent exclusion, from mainstream schools.  At the Key Stage 3 section, students spend on average no more than two terms and are taught in mixed age ability groups prior to returning to mainstream or other special schools. At Key Stage 4, the focus in Year 10 is on re-integration to mainstream schools, whereas Year 11 students stay on roll and follow a range of GCSE and vocational courses.

p.3

Information about this school

 Forest Pathway College, some 2.5 miles away, is based at the Asian Centre in Walthamstow. It provides education to Year 11 students who are new to the local authority or have experienced significant disruptions to their education. These include new arrivals from overseas who have some use of English, students in the very early stages of learning English, students with very limited previous schooling, United Kingdom-born or overseas-born students who already speak English but have a pattern of disrupted education, students who need to improve their basic skills and students who for a variety of social or emotional reasons are not suited to a mainstream school.  Currently, the large majority of students are boys. The majority of students are of White British or White European background. A small minority are from Black or minority ethnic groups, with a few of Pakistani background. A few are at school action plus of the Code of Practice for Special

p.3

Information about this school

Educational Needs. The majority of students, particularly at Forest Pathway College, are from families where English is not the home language. Numbers on roll vary as students join the school at different times during the year.  The proportion of students eligible for the pupil premium, which provides additional government funding to support pupils known to be eligible for free school meals, children in local authority care and children from service families, is broadly in line with the national average. Currently, there are no children from service families. A few are in local authority care. Although there are a number of students eligible for support through pupil premium funding, the funding has only just been recently allocated.  The school uses alternative off-site provision throughout the week for vocational courses at Brooks Farm in Leyton, the Beckton Business Park and the Floor Train in Walthamstow for Years

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Increase the proportion of outstanding teaching and learning by making sure that:  staff have the expertise to support students more effectively to improve the important skills of literacy, numeracy and information and communication technology (ICT) in all lessons  all adults who support students in lessons are deployed effectively in order to ensure students make the best progress possible.  Make sure the management of improvement planning and the analysis and use of students’ progress data provide the full picture across the school.

p.3

The achievement of pupils is good

 For almost all students, attainment on entry to the school is well below that of their classmates in mainstream schools. Many have been underachieving. This is as a result of missed schooling, often because of exclusion, negative experiences of mainstream schools and, for many students, difficulties in settling comfortably into school life. In addition, those new to the country often have a poor grasp of English, which makes learning difficult.  Good quality support for all means there are no particular differences in the rates of progress made by those with different levels of learning difficulties, boys and girls, students from different ethnic backgrounds, or those known to be eligible for free school meals.  In Key Stage 3, after careful checking of students’ abilities, the school provides individual support plans and a mentoring programme, as well as keeping students up to date with their

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

subjects. After a stay of up to 26 weeks, most are reintegrated successfully back to mainstream or other specialist provision. Similar provision also enables Year 10 students to follow the same routes.  In Year 11, whatever time of the year they arrive, students attend full time until the end of the school year. At the end of the last school year, at the Burnside site, a small minority of students achieved A* to C grade passes at GCSE and most students achieved a number of passes at grades A* to D, including English and mathematics.  At Forest Pathway College, in 2012, most students with higher level skills in English achieved GCSE passes at grade E or above and the majority of those students in the middle group achieved a similar proportion of passes. For some of those for whom English is an additional language, this represents remarkable achievement as they spend only one year, at the most, preparing for the examinations.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 In almost all lessons, progress is good. In a mathematics lesson, students with lower standards of English language made good progress in learning the various words used to describe the main mathematical ‘signs’ used in calculations. This prepared them well for their forthcoming examination. In a geography lesson, students improved their understanding of the effects of volcanic activity on populations.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Teaching throughout the school promotes good learning for all. Teaching in English and mathematics is good and has improved since the unit opened. However, teachers do not always provide enough opportunities for students to practise the important skills of literacy, numeracy and ICT in all lessons.  Notwithstanding this, a key strength is the high expectations of teachers and how well they plan tasks that are suitable for all abilities, as well as matching the requirements for the examination courses older students follow. This was particularly evident in an English lesson where students were reading text aloud and then identifying nouns, adjectives, verbs and adverbs before producing a piece of descriptive writing.  Teachers know their students well and ensure they provide a good range of resources to make learning lively and interesting. In a starter activity in a religious education lesson, students

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

reviewed beliefs such as ‘an eye for an eye’ and ‘turning the other cheek’ through a quiz looking at different religions. This resulted in them gaining a good grasp of the topic and learning well throughout the lesson.  Teachers and other adults supporting in lessons generally work well together. Praise and encouragement are used appropriately, which keep students motivated throughout the lesson. This was particularly effective in an ICT lesson on three-dimensional design where the teacher gave an on-going review of students’ work throughout.  On occasions, however, support staff are not directed well enough to check that all students understand what is expected of them and the progress they are making towards the learning outcomes set by teachers. As a result, progress for some students is, at times, not as rapid as it could be.  Parents feel their children are taught well. Students say teaching is good because the range of

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

teaching styles makes learning interesting.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Behaviour is good in and around the school because of consistent routines and the high expectations that are made abundantly clear to students. At the Burnside site, students are searched on arrival in line with the school’s policy on zero tolerance to drugs and weapons, which is reinforced by weapons and drugs awareness programmes as part of the curriculum.  Students also respond well to the school’s zero tolerance to assaults on staff or other students, including verbal threats or threatening behaviour. Many who arrive with a record of poor behaviour settle quickly into the life of the school. There have been no recorded instances of racism, homophobia or bullying. There have been no permanent exclusions and the number of instances where students have not been allowed to go to the school for a short period of time because of poor behaviour is falling. Students are aware of different kinds of bullying and

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

potential pitfalls of gang culture, saying that the school would deal with these issues if they occurred.  Students rekindle their interest in education and want to do well, most Year 11 students intending to continue to further education or training when the leave. A student proudly told an inspector that he was looking forward to attending an interview the next day at a local college, adding, ‘I want to make something better of my life!’  Attendance for most at the Burnside site improves considerably at the unit. However, punctuality at the start of the day remains an issue for a few.  Students say the school is a safe place to learn and that they get on well together, as well as with their teachers. One student commented, ‘This is the best place. It is like a family, teachers talk to you and they listen!’ Parents, too, comment on how well students are looked after and how their behaviour improves, which contributes well to students’ all round strong spiritual,

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

moral, social and cultural development.  Attitudes to learning are generally very positive. In lessons, students work as pairs or small groups and listen to one another’s comments and opinions. During an arts award course lesson, students responded keenly to the thought-provoking and probing questioning about their work.

p.5

The leadership and management are good

 The senior associate head and his senior staff are effective leaders and committed to sustained improvement. However, improvement planning and analysis and use of students’ progress data are not yet managed coherently to provide a full picture across the whole PRU. Nevertheless, staff and members of the management committee are committed to helping students achieve as much as possible and recognise what needs to be improved for the school to become outstanding.  Senior leaders regularly and carefully check the quality of teaching, setting teachers targets to improve the quality of their work. At the end of the year, recommendations will be made regarding additional responsibilities and training opportunities.  All students, regardless of their circumstances or needs, make good progress in their learning and personal development. This is underpinned by the school’s strong commitment to equality of

p.5

The leadership and management are good

opportunity for all. There is no discrimination of any kind.  The subjects and topics studied by students are similar to mainstream schools and tailored to their individual needs. This prepares them well for the next stage of their education or re- integration to other mainstream settings. A range of extra activities in the school and opportunities for off-site visits and alternative placements during the week contribute further to students’ strong spiritual, moral, social and cultural development.  The school’s highly effective work with a broad range of other professionals and community organisations supports students’ wide-ranging needs well. Parents appreciate the school’s work, which is reflected in their positive responses to the school’s questionnaires and their telephone comments to the inspection service provider.  The local authority, fulfilling its statutory duties at that time, has supported the school well since

p.5

The leadership and management are good

the amalgamation through an appropriate and moderate level of support for this good provision.  The governance of the school:  The management committee’s overall contribution to the governance of the school is very effective. It provides strong challenge to ensure continuing improvements in all aspects of the school’s work. It is involved in monitoring the performance management of teaching staff, checking decisions about how they are working, any action that may be needed, training and pay. In addition, it makes sure safeguarding procedures are robust and highly effective. The experienced chair and committed members have come to grips quickly with the new regulations and responsibilities devolved from local authorities to schools of this type since 1 April 2013, despite the delegated budget having only recently been announced. In addition, it has only been very recently informed as to the amount of pupil premium funding allocated to

p.6

The leadership and management are good

the school. Planning as to how this can be used to best effect is under way.

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.7

School details

Unique reference number 137328 Local authority Waltham Forest Inspection number 400296

p.8

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.8

School details

Type of school Pupil referral unit School category Pupil referral unit Age range of pupils 11–16 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 128 Appropriate authority The local authority Senior Associate Head George Collins Date of previous school inspection NA Telephone number 020 8496 1962 Fax number 020 8531 3423 Email address george.collins@walthamforest.gov.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.9

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.9

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion