Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Rachel Howie
- Postcode verified
WV5 8DZ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- In English and mathematics older pupils know the level at which they are working because they now have targets in their books that shows them what they need to do to improve. p.2
- The school should take further action to: p.2
- When the new literacy leader takes up post in September, ensuring work is well matched to the needs of all pupils should be a priority. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 974
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Jayne Keegan-Hobbs Headteacher St Bernadette's Catholic Primary School Lindale Drive Wombourne Wolverhampton WV5 8DZ
p.1
Catholic Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 20 June 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Catholic Primary School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in February 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with yourself, the Chair and Vice Chair of the governing body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. The school improvement plan was evaluated. A range of documentation was reviewed, including information about pupils’ achievement, feedback to teachers following reviews of work and lesson observations and minutes from governors’ meetings. During this visit, you joined me on a short visit to each classroom to talk to pupils and look at the work in their books.
p.1
Context
Since the last inspection one teacher, who was the literacy leader, has left the school and has been replaced temporarily until July, with two experienced teachers in a job share role. There is no-one currently fulfilling the role of literacy leader. Two additional teachers have been appointed to start in September. One of these will be Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01216 799164 Direct email :tim.ogbourn@serco.com the literacy leader. Two additional classrooms are being built and, in September, there will be four classes instead of the current three.
p.1
Main findings
You responded quickly and positively to the findings of the section 5 inspection. You demonstrate determination and enthusiasm to make the school good as soon as possible. The school’s action plan shows a sharp focus on the actions needed to improve the school and has clearly defined timescales. The plan states clearly who will monitor and evaluate the actions taken and the impact on pupils’ learning. The school’s review of the action plan shows progress towards the areas for improvement. This is due to the commitment of all staff and governors to the process of improvement.
p.2
Main findings
As a result of the effective way you have been coaching teachers and the opportunity they have been given to visit other local good schools, there is evidence, from the school’s monitoring, that teaching is improving across the school. Your regular pupil progress meetings show that teachers are becoming more confident when assessing pupils’ work. During my visits to lessons and when I looked through pupils’ books I observed that activities are increasingly well matched to the needs and abilities of most pupils. However, this is not always the case for the lower ability pupils, particularly in literacy. When the new literacy leader takes up post in September, ensuring work is well matched to the needs of all pupils should be a priority. Information about how well pupils are progressing is collected and analysed regularly, however the system being used does not provide sufficiently detailed information. It is not showing precisely enough how much progress pupils make
p.2
Main findings
In English and mathematics older pupils know the level at which they are working because they now have targets in their books that shows them what they need to do to improve. During my visits to lessons teaching assistants were being used effectively with groups of pupils in all classes, to support the development of more brisk paced learning.
p.2
Main findings
Better marking is beginning to show pupils how they can improve their learning however this is not yet consistent across the school. Some teachers are not yet giving pupils detailed enough information on how to improve their work and opportunities are being missed for pupils to accelerate the progress they make.
p.2
Main findings
The Governing Body has responded very positively to the findings of the last inspection and has taken decisive action. They have accessed relevant training and are now more effective in holding senior leaders to account. They are involved in decision making on whole school issues and have a clear understanding of the schools’ strengths and weaknesses. They ask challenging questions about the quality of teaching and the progress of pupils. Governors visit the school more regularly to check for themselves that all pupils are being helped to make better progress. Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.2
Main findings
implement a more precise tracking system that accurately records termly assessment information to ensure all pupils are making at least good progress.
p.3
Main findings
make sure that all teachers’ marking is sufficiently detailed to help pupils improve their work
p.3
Main findings
provide a thorough induction process for the new literacy leader to enable her to quickly and effectively monitor the progress pupils make in this subject and ensure work is matched to the needs of all pupils.
p.3
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.3
External support
The local authority has provided the school with good support. Training for governors has been particularly effective in helping them to monitor the progress of the school more effectively. Making links with another local school has been helpful in improving the practice of teachers and subject leaders. There is further scope for support with the implementation of a system that tracks more effectively the progress pupils make.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Staffordshire.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion