Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 9 Jul 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Janet Palmer

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Janet Palmer

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+3Mixedmore positive than 26% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingvery wellenthusiasmeffectiveclearclearly
Criticismtoo lowinconsistenciesconcernlacksgapsunclearnot confidentbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
824
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 45
Average sentence
24 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
24%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566855 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: gail.hill@cfbt.com

p.1

Mr A Birchall Headteacher The Byrchall High School Warrington Road Wigan Lancashire WN4 9PQ

p.1

Wigan

Following my visit to your academy accompanied by Philippa Darley HMI on 18 June 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave us and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the academy since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Wigan

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in April 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you, other senior leaders, students, members of the Governing Body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The academy action plan and self-evaluation summary were evaluated alongside your ‘Actions and Impact’ document.

p.1

Context

Since your last inspection you have appointed a new head of science.

p.1

Main findings

Your own academy data and self-evaluation summary indicate some improvements in achievement across a range of subjects and show good achievement in mathematics. Data suggest that gaps in attainment between more disadvantaged students and their peers, are beginning to close. However, your self-evaluation rightly points out that achievement in English and science needs to improve further to be at least in-line with achievement in mathematics. It also notes that that the proportion of students attaining the highest grades across the curriculum, and the achievement of those with special educational needs is too low because teachers’ expectations are too low.

p.2

Main findings

Students told us that they enjoyed most of their lessons, particularly in mathematics and physical education but that there were some inconsistencies in the quality of teaching. They would like to see more variety in the tasks they are given in English and be given more one- to-one help in science. Year 8 students would like to do more challenging and interesting work, rather than continuing the work they began in Year 7. Students enjoyed lessons the most where the teacher demonstrated enthusiasm for the subject and related it to real life. Some expressed the concern that less confident students found it difficult to ask for and receive one-to-one attention from their teachers.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders expressed the view that many teachers had lost confidence in their teaching abilities but that they had benefited greatly from a recent training session from the academy’s resident inspector. The resident inspector has also helped teachers to understand how to develop their marking and this has led to some clear improvements. You have also encouraged teachers to reflect higher aspirations by referring to ‘minimum expected grades’ rather than ‘target grades’.

p.2

Main findings

Students behave very well around the academy and in lessons. They told us how much they appreciate the wide range of extra-curricular activities which I know you monitor carefully to ensure all have a chance to participate.

p.2

Main findings

You, your senior team and the Governing Body concede that leaders and managers had over-estimated how well the academy was doing and had ‘taken their eye off the ball’ between inspections. It is evident that middle leaders have performed well when the spotlight was on their work but were more complacent and less accountable for the performance of their teams when the spotlight shone elsewhere.

p.2

Main findings

The academy action plan concentrates on the key areas for improvement but is overly long, sometimes repetitive and lacks focus on the priorities for action. It is unclear how the range of groups such as the Standards and Effectiveness Committee, the Progress Group, the Joint Professional Development Group, the High Attainers Focus Group and other improvement teams will interact and communicate to achieve agreed goals.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders, governors and the local authority are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The academy should take further action to:

p.2

Main findings

 redraft the action plan to ensure it focuses clearly on the areas for improvement and is simple to evaluate in terms of outcomes achieved  take advantage of local authority support to link with outstanding schools and departments Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The support offered by the local authority is extensive and needs to be taken full advantage of. It has already funded some linking work between the English department and an outstanding practitioner in a local school and is prepared to broker and fund further school linking work with outstanding schools across the authority.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and as below.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion