Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 8 Jul 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Philip Smith (lead), Cathryn Kirby

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Cathryn Kirby, Philip Smith

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+41Positivemore positive than 45% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingstrengtheffectiveimproving
Criticismnot effectivebelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
717
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
26 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566862 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: rcowley@cfbt.com

p.1

Mrs Sarah Young Headteacher Hessle High School and Sixth Form College Tranby House Hessle Unknown HU13 0JQ

p.1

Sixth Form College, East Riding of Yorkshire

Following my visit with Philip Smith, Her Majesty's Inspector, to your school on 17 June 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Sixth Form College, East Riding of Yorkshire

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in April 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you other senior leaders, representatives of the Governing Body, a group of teachers, middle leaders and a representative of the Trust to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The school improvement plan was evaluated and monitoring records of lesson observations were scrutinised.

p.1

Context

Since the section 5 inspection there have been no significant changes to the school’s context. The school is an academy supported through a local Trust arrangement.

p.1

Main findings

The headteacher has prioritised work to improve the quality of teaching. A strength of the new lesson planning template is that it is a ‘live’ document which teachers are encouraged to annotate as they reflect on the success of their lesson and plan the next steps for students’ learning. Teachers and middle leaders are finding the new approach helpful as a strategy for self-evaluation. The headteacher has established links with other schools through local partnerships, and although these arrangements were in place prior to the section 5 inspection, they show the school recognises the importance of communication and collaboration with others. In discussion, other leaders did not demonstrate convincingly the level of critical thinking and incisive action necessary to move the school to good within 18 – 24 months.

p.2

Main findings

The Trustees and governors have not acted with the same urgency. They have not robustly challenged senior leaders’ over-generous view of the school’s effectiveness immediately prior to the section 5 inspection, particularly around the quality of teaching, nor have they taken incisive action to set in train support for the wider leadership team to quickly increase their impact as leaders and managers of change.

p.2

Main findings

The school improvement plan requires some revision to give a sharper focus on the sixth form and the Learning Support Centres, both aspects of provision identified as requiring improvement in the main body of the section 5 inspection report. The judgements following my visit are given below.

p.2

Main findings

The headteacher is taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection.

p.2

Main findings

Governors and trustees are not taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the last section 5 inspection.

p.2

Main findings

The school should take immediate action to:

p.2

Main findings

- incorporate into the school improvement plan actions relating to the improvement of the sixth form and the Learning Support Centre - use established links to provide leaders, in particular the deputy headteachers given their strategic role, with opportunities to observe first-hand good and outstanding leadership and management of teaching and learning.

p.2

Main findings

We discussed and agreed that I would carry out a further visit and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The school has established links locally as a member of the East Riding Learning Partnership and as a member of the academy headteachers’ group. The headteacher considers these links are beneficial in ensuring the school remains outward looking and cites examples of how these links have been used to support areas of the school’s work. More could be made of these partnerships to develop the skills and knowledge of the wider school leadership, including the governors, to ensure that their work has greater impact on improving the quality of provision and outcomes so that the school is judged good at its next inspection. I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion