Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Fosse Way Academy

Inspected 14 Jun 2013 · published 5 Jul 2013 · URN 136790

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    14 Jun 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Joan McPhail, Krishan Sharma, Stephen Palmer

  • Leadership and management AI-checked

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    LN6 8DU

  • Name on report verified

    Fosse Way Academy

  • URN verified

    136790

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+52Positivemore positive than 13% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingexcellentvery welleffectivestrengthsgood progressstrongconsistently
Criticismnot alwaysinadequateweaknessesrequires improvementunacceptableseriousnot outstandinginsufficiently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1195w+72
  • Leadership630w+11
  • What needs to improve119w+67

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,872
shorter than usual (typical 2966)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
1
typical 2
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 44%Leadership 23%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 29%

Full report text

Fosse Way Academy Ash Grove, North Hykeham, Lincoln, LN6 8DU

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Not previously inspected This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Outstanding 1 Leadership and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a good school.  Pupils achieve very well in writing and increasingly well in reading and mathematics.  Teaching is usually good, with some that is outstanding. As a result, pupils, including children in Nursery and Reception, make good progress.  Leadership and management are good. Senior leaders have successfully maintained the proven strengths in the quality of teaching and pupils’ achievement.  Pupils’ attitudes to learning are impressive, as is their conduct towards their peers and adults in the school. Their behaviour is excellent. They feel very safe at school.  The range of extra activities offered to pupils is extensive. Visitors to school, music, art, drama and sports activities all enrich and extend pupils’ learning.  Pupils enjoy coming to school. Their attendance is above average.

p.1

It is not yet an outstanding school because

 There is not enough outstanding teaching to help pupils make even more rapid progress in reading and mathematics.  Teachers do not always set work that demands enough of pupils or ensure that lessons are well-paced.  Checks made by senior leaders on teaching do not focus sufficiently on the progress made by different groups of pupils.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed 27 lessons or parts of lessons, five of which were observed jointly with senior leaders.  Meetings were held with a randomly selected group of pupils, the Chair and Vice-Chair of the Governing Body and senior and middle leaders.  Inspectors looked at a wide range of school documents, including the school’s own data concerning pupils’ current and recent progress, planning and monitoring documentation, and records relating to behaviour, attendance and safeguarding arrangements.  Inspectors took into account 45 responses to the Online Parent View questionnaire together with the school’s own recent survey of parents’ views. Additionally, all three inspectors talked informally to a few parents and carers in the playground as they brought their children to school on the second day of the inspection.  Inspectors considered 25 questionnaires returned by staff.

p.2

Inspection team

Krishan Sharma, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Joan McPhail Additional Inspector Stephen Palmer Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 This is larger than the average-sized primary school.  The proportion of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs supported through school action is below average, as is the proportion of those supported at school action plus or who have a statement of special educational needs.  Most pupils are White British.  The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for pupil premium funding is much lower than average. This is extra funding provided by the government to support certain groups of pupils. In this school, it applies only to pupils known to be eligible for free school meals and pupils from service families.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress.  The school manages specialist provision for a group of pupils with speech and language difficulties. It caters for up to 12 pupils aged 4 to 11.

p.3

Information about this school

 There is a breakfast club, which is not managed by the governing body and was not part of this inspection.  The school became an academy on 1 June 2011. When last inspected in July 2010, the predecessor school, known as Fosse Way Primary School, was judged to be outstanding. The current headteachers were both in post at that time, one as headteacher and the other as deputy headteacher.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Raise the proportion of outstanding teaching so that pupils make rapid and sustained progress in all lessons by:  setting work that challenges all groups of pupils, particularly in reading and mathematics  ensuring that lessons move at a brisk pace and that pupils are given maximum time to work on their own  making sure that adults in Nursery and Reception make well-timed interventions when children are working independently to deepen their learning.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the impact of leaders on the quality of teaching by:  increasing the focus of lesson observation by senior and middle leaders on the progress made by different groups of pupils  sharing the outstanding practice that already exists in the school.

p.3

The achievement of pupils is good

 Children in Nursery and Reception make a good start and develop their reading, writing and mathematics skills well. Most of them enter Nursery and Reception with skills and knowledge that are broadly at the levels expected for their age, with a few at higher levels than are normally expected. Good progress continues as pupils move through the school.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 After a slight dip at the end of Year 2 in 2012, pupils’ attainment is currently rising to above average. Writing is now particularly strong. Pupils’ attainment at the end of Year 6 remains consistently above average in both English and mathematics.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Progress in reading is mostly good. Pupils’ knowledge of phonics (the sounds that letters make) is strong because its teaching is regular and effective. They enjoy reading and most are competent readers as they move through the school, although not all of them are secure in understanding of the meaning of the text they read.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 A higher proportion of pupils than in schools nationally now make better than expected progress in writing. Pupils write for a good range of purposes. The examples of pupils’ written work seen during the inspection showed a good degree of technical accuracy and control.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Pupils’ progress in mathematics is good and contributes to their consistently above average attainment. However, progress in some lessons was insufficiently rapid due to unnecessary repetition. Pupils can make mental and written calculations with confidence and accuracy.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Pupils’ oral skills are well developed and most are good listeners. They are keen to talk and express their ideas confidently. Pupils are competent in using computers for locating and extracting the information they need.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs, including those taught in the speech and language class, make progress similar to their peers. The extra support they receive is carefully targeted to meet their individual needs accurately.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Across the school, a few more-able pupils make slower progress than they should because work set for them is not always demanding enough.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 In the 2012 Year 6 tests, the gap in attainment between pupils known to be eligible for pupil premium funding and other pupils was slightly larger than that found nationally. The gap is the equivalent of two terms behind in English and mathematics. The school’s tracking of pupils’ progress shows that these pupils are beginning to make faster progress. The extra help they get through a range of interventions is making a difference.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Teaching is usually good and some of it is outstanding. It has supported pupils’ good progress over time and has made an effective contribution to their well-developed social skills and excellent relationships.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 In Nursery and Reception classes, adults are skilful in communicating with young children, who find this reassuring. On occasions, adults miss opportunities to intervene to help children to remain focused on their activities by commenting on what they are doing or by asking questions.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Planning is generally good, with teachers having a clear idea of what they want pupils to learn and achieve. They expect all pupils to work hard. The teaching assistants are very clearly briefed, which enables them to make a constructive contribution to pupils’ learning.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 In the best lessons, teachers achieve a high level of commitment from all pupils, who make good or better gains in their knowledge and understanding. They check pupils’ progress through persistent and probing questions and their comments challenge pupils to think deeply. The pace of these lessons is brisk and pupils are given enough time to work on their own. These strengths are not found in all lessons.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 In a very small minority of lessons, teachers do not set tasks that provide a suitable challenge for all groups of pupils, particularly the more-able. Consequently, pupils do not make the best possible progress in reading and mathematics.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 The teaching of writing is conscientious and is increasingly effective. Teachers’ skills are now much stronger as a result of the training they have received. Systematic guidance in planning for writing and constructive comments are helping all groups of pupils to become competent writers.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 The teaching of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs systematically builds on their previous knowledge and skills. This helps adults to consolidate learning as well as planning their next steps.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 The teaching of pupils who are supported by pupil premium funding is specifically aimed at improving their basic skills. The extra support, given through small groups and one-to-one arrangements, is beginning to help them to catch up.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 The teaching of pupils in the specialist speech and language class is effectively targeted at meeting their specific needs. Carefully planned programmes of activities help them to achieve well from their individual starting points.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding

 Pupils display excellent attitudes to their learning. They take pride in their work and appreciate what the school provides for them. All groups of pupils relate very well with each other.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding

 Children in the Nursery and Reception are very responsive and willingly join in all the activities planned for them. They move around responsibly and care about each other’s safety.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding

 Behaviour is almost always impeccable and is consistently well managed. Pupils understand what is acceptable and what is not. They show excellent manners towards each other and adults.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding

 Pupils, including those in the specialist speech and language class, feel safe and secure. They are aware that they have a responsibility towards their own and others’ safety. Pupils understand that bullying may take various forms, including name-calling and inappropriate use of the internet. They say that bullying is rare, and is unacceptable. If and when it occurs, it is dealt with promptly.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding

 Attendance is above average. Senior leaders continue to promote regular attendance and punctuality.

p.5

The leadership and management are good

 Senior leaders have successfully secured pupils’ good achievement and the good quality of teaching. The school evaluates its performance accurately and has demonstrable capacity to improve further.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Pupils’ progress is regularly reviewed to ensure that extra help is provided to those who need it. Senior leaders and governors maintain a continuous review of the performance of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs, and those who are supported by pupil premium funding. They are determined to ensure that they get a fair deal and that their equality of opportunity is safeguarded.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Leaders’ checks on the quality of teaching are regular and are generally accurate. Their monitoring does not always include a specific focus on the progress different groups of pupils make in lessons and in their written work.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Performance management arrangements establish clear links between teachers’ pay and the impact of their classroom practice on pupils’ learning and achievement. Continuing staff training is rightly linked to the school’s key priorities for improvement. Recent external training on the teaching of writing has strengthened teachers’ skills and has contributed to improvements in pupils’ achievement. Senior leaders recognise that the school could make further use of its best classroom practice to improve the quality of teaching.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The curriculum and planned extra-curricular activities contribute well to the development of pupils’ basic skills and their personal development. Knowledgeable visitors, sport, music, drama, art and educational visits all promote pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development well.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The school has an extensive range of links with parents. Parents and carers appreciate easy access to staff in Nursery and Reception classes. Most parents are satisfied with the information they receive about their children’s performance at school.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The governance of the school:  The governors have a good knowledge of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. The governing body maintains an overview of pupils’ performance and knows how well the school is faring in comparison with similar schools nationally. Governors keep themselves informed about the overall quality of teaching. They are fully aware of the need to align teachers’ performance in the classroom with their pay rises and promotion. The governing body has a good grasp of the school budget and is determined to ensure that the pupil premium funding is used to boost the achievement of eligible pupils. It ensures that the school’s safeguarding arrangements meet current national standards. Governors bring a good range of skills and experience to the work of the governing body and are ready to seek training that will help them to do their job better.

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.7

School details

Unique reference number 136790 Local authority Lincolnshire Inspection number 412284

p.8

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.8

School details

Type of school Academy converter School category Non-maintained Age range of pupils 3–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 570 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Bruce Large Headteachers Nora Walkley and Robert Cowling Date of previous school inspection Not previously inspected Telephone number 01522 682020 Fax number 01522 696977 Email address admin@fosse-way-academy.org guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.9

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.9

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion