Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Joanne Olsson
- Postcode verified
LS4 2TF
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Achievement in English requires improvement. p.1
- Pupils’ achievement in reading and writing is improving over time. p.1
- In 2012 pupils made good progress from their starting points so standards broadly matched the national average. p.1
- Nonetheless, this positive picture is not reflected in all classes. p.1
- Although many more pupils are making expected progress, not enough are making greater gains in their learning. p.1
- As a result attainment in reading and writing remains variable across the school. p.1
- Achievement gaps between different groups are narrowing convincingly. p.1
- Pupils are enthusiastic about English lessons. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 881
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Mrs C McDonald Headteacher Sacred Heart Catholic Primary School Eden Way Leeds West Yorkshire LS4 2TF
p.1
Ofsted 2012–13 subject survey inspection programme: English
Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit on 5 June 2013 to look at work in English.
p.1
Ofsted 2012–13 subject survey inspection programme: English
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.
p.1
Ofsted 2012–13 subject survey inspection programme: English
The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and pupils; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; and observation of five lessons. One observation was carried out jointly with you.
p.1
The overall effectiveness of English requires improvement
Achievement in English requires improvement.
p.1
The overall effectiveness of English requires improvement
Pupils’ achievement in reading and writing is improving over time. In 2012 pupils made good progress from their starting points so standards broadly matched the national average. Nonetheless, this positive picture is not reflected in all classes. Although many more pupils are making expected progress, not enough are making greater gains in their learning. As a result attainment in reading and writing remains variable across the school. Achievement gaps between different groups are narrowing convincingly. Pupils are enthusiastic about English lessons. They work hard and are keen to succeed. Pupils work well together in group activities and they are willing to share their ideas and listen to each other. Pupils’ attitudes to reading have improved and they enjoy reading for purpose and for pleasure in school and at home. They are equally keen to write. Some pupils are able to write with flair and imagination for sustained periods of
p.1
The overall effectiveness of English requires improvement
time. They use vocabulary and punctuation well to add depth to their writing and grasp the reader’s interest. Not all pupils achieve as well because their progress is hampered by an overuse of worksheets. This limits pupils’ ability to think for themselves and to write at length. Too many pupils have weak spelling and handwriting skills.
p.2
The overall effectiveness of English requires improvement
Teaching in English requires improvement.
p.2
The overall effectiveness of English requires improvement
All teachers plan interesting lessons which capture pupils’ interest and make learning relevant. Teachers are striving to help pupils become independent learners by providing opportunities for pupils to develop their speaking and listening skills. Teaching Assistants and classroom volunteers make a positive difference to pupils’ learning. Some English teaching is good. This is because teachers have strong subject knowledge and high expectations of all pupils. However, not all teaching matches the best. In less effective lessons, time is not used wisely and some activities, particularly those designed for the most able pupils, lack challenge. Teachers’ marking of pupils’ English work is thorough and provides helpful guidance so pupils know what they need to do to improve. However, pupils are not always given time to respond to these useful comments.
p.2
The overall effectiveness of English requires improvement
Pupils are full of praise for the teaching they receive. They recognise English teaching has improved. As one pupil commented, ‘Teachers try hard to engage with us and make learning exciting.’ Pupils appreciate the different opportunities they have to talk and plan their work before setting pen to paper.
p.2
The curriculum in English requires improvement
The English curriculum successfully helps pupils gain key skills and knowledge as they move from class to class. The teaching of reading and narrative writing is systematically planned so teachers know exactly what they need to teach to help pupils reach the levels expected for their age. The school is in the early stages of planning a whole-school approach for non-fiction writing to ensure all pupils have enough opportunity to deepen their knowledge and skills. The use of information communication technology (ICT) and multi-media to broaden pupils’ experiences is underdeveloped. The building blocks to help pupils use their English skills in other subjects are firmly in place. This means teachers are making links between different areas of the curriculum to make learning more purposeful.
p.2
The curriculum in English requires improvement
Links with external partners are being exploited more effectively to enrich the English curriculum. Opportunities for pupils to attend a Drama Club, produce their own plays, work with visiting authors and visit the library are all helping to broaden pupils’ experiences and harness their enthusiasm for reading and writing.
p.2
Leadership and management of English is good
Although relatively new to post, the subject leader, with the full support of senior leaders, has driven improvements in English. Teaching is improving and pupils are making greater gains in their learning. The impact of his work is evident in the successful whole-school approach to reading which has led to improvements in pupils’ attitudes and achievement. Leaders and managers know what they need to do to bring about further success and have appropriate plans in place. They have a detailed understanding of current strengths and weaknesses because the checks on teaching are frequent and thorough. Teachers’ benefit from clear feedback and good subject guidance. Information on pupils’ progress is used well to ensure any pupils who are falling behind receive extra help. As a result achievement gaps are closing and more pupils are making expected progress in reading and writing.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
raising pupils’ achievement in English further by: - tackling pupils’ weaknesses in spelling and handwriting - ensuring pupils are given time to act on the helpful guidance teachers provide in their marking - ensuring activities challenge all pupils, including the most able
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
improving the English curriculum by: - ensuring the teaching of non-fiction writing is systematically planned across the school so all pupils have sufficient opportunity to deepen their skills and knowledge - providing greater opportunities for pupils to use ICT and multi-media in their everyday English lessons.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop English in the school.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion