Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 3 Jul 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Angela Headon

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Angela Headon

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+25Mostly positivemore positive than 37% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiserobusteffectivestronglyswiftlyaccurately
Criticismlimitedyet to

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings227w0
  • Leadership470w+25

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
697
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 30, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 31%Leadership 65%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566855 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: gail.hill@cfbt.com

p.1

Ms J Szymonowicz and Ms S Rowe Interim executive headteachers Epworth Primary Academy Birchfield Road Doncaster South Yorkshire DN9 1DL

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Epworth Primary Academy

Following my visit to your school on 12 June 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the academy's recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Epworth Primary Academy

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the academy became subject to special measures following the inspection which took place in February 2013.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, meetings were held with the interim executive headteachers, the deputy headteacher, the Chair and Vice-Chair of the Governing Body and two representatives from the local authority. The governing body’s statement of action and action plan, the academy’s improvement plan and a number of supporting documents were evaluated.

p.1

Context

Since the inspection in February 2013, the headteacher and one class teacher have resigned. The academy is currently led by two interim executive headteachers, who have been in post for approximately three weeks. Two new senior leaders have been appointed for September 2013 with responsibility for special educational needs and literacy. Three new governors have joined the governing body.

p.1

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Since their recent appointment, the interim executive headteachers, building on the work of the substantive deputy headteacher, have worked swiftly and have started to tackle the key areas for improvement. Actions taken to date include: the introduction of a monitoring programme, including lesson observations and the scrutiny of teachers’ and pupils’ work; the development of a more robust tracking system to monitor pupils’ attainment and progress and accurately identify where intervention is required; targeted professional development for staff; the introduction of focused reading strategies; a full staffing review, with a proposed new staffing structure; and the introduction of a ’parents’ panel’.

p.1

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Senior leaders have also started to review and amend the academy’s improvement plan, which now includes specific timescales and indicates how often the academy’s work will be checked. However, overall, this work is at an early stage of development.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The governing body’s action plan includes success criteria, actions to be taken and personnel responsible for monitoring improvements, notably the academy’s ‘progress team’. This group includes governors, senior leaders and local authority personnel. However, the plan does not explicitly indicate what the academy’s expectations are for improvement over time and how regularly the impact of the academy’s work will be measured. There is currently no action plan in place for the next academic year, 2013/2014.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The governing body has brokered an external review of governance, as recommended at the previous inspection. This is due to take place during the summer term and will be led by a National Leader of Governance. However, overall, there has been no significant change in the limited effectiveness of the governing body since the previous inspection. The governing body has yet to make a decision on the headteacher position from September 2013.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Although Epworth has academy status, senior leaders work in partnership with the local authority. The local authority has provided effective support to the academy, notably working with the governing body in the appointment of the interim headteachers, funding additional visits by the school improvement partner, providing governor training on assessment data, and advice on long-term financial planning. The academy is also working with a number of local academies, including South Axholme and Westwoodside. The Chair of the Governing Body and an assistant headteacher from South Axholme Academy have recently joined Epworth Academy’s governing body.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The governing body’s statement of action is not fit for purpose.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The academy’s improvement plan is not fit for purpose.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Having considered all the evidence, I strongly recommend that the academy does not seek to appoint newly qualified teachers.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children's Services for North Lincolnshire, and the Department for Education Academies Adviser Unit. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion