Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 2 Jul 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Joanna Beckford-Hall

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Joanna Beckford-Hall

  • Postcode verified

    DA14 4JN

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+18Mostly positivemore positive than 34% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrengthseffectivehigh expectationsrapid progresswell-ledclearrigoroussupportive
Criticismweaknessesnot good enoughgapsweaknessnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings930w+23
  • What needs to improve184w−33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
1,111
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 83%What needs to improve 17%

Full report text

Mrs Tyler-Maher Headteacher Cleeve Park School Bexley Lane Sidcup Kent DA14 4JN

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Cleeve Park School

Following my visit to your school on 17 June 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the academy since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Cleeve Park School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in March 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

I met with you and your senior leaders, members of the governing body, the chief executive and the progress advisor from The Kemnal Academies Trust (TKAT). I reviewed your academy improvement plans, minutes of governing body meetings and documents about the monitoring and improvements to teaching. We toured the school to see students in lessons and discussed strengths and weaknesses in teaching.

p.1

Context

Since the most recent section 5 inspection leaders from The Kemnal Academies Trust (TKAT) have been providing additional support to the academy.

p.1

Main findings

You and your leaders have a good understanding of the strengths and weaknesses at the academy. Leaders understand that they have to move quickly to raise students’ achievement to good but recognise that changes must be sustainable to ensure the longer term success of the academy. Working with leaders from the Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 3115319 Direct F 0117 3150430 Direct email :matthew.parker@tribalgroup.com Trust, you are refining your school improvement planning, the monitoring and evaluation of teaching, and the bespoke support you provide to teachers. You have made clear your high expectations of teachers, teaching assistants and students, so that everyone understands why the academy must improve rapidly. Teachers are learning new ways of managing challenging behaviour in lessons and how to teach

p.1

Main findings

You have worked quickly to assess the quality of teaching. You know where the strengths lie and you are using models of good practice to help other teachers improve. You have challenging discussions with teachers whose performance is not good enough. Teachers have new targets for their performance and you have reviewed teachers’ performance to assess if their work reflects their salary grade.

p.2

Main findings

The programme of coaching led by your assistant headteacher, with additional expertise from the director of the teaching school for TKAT, provides teachers with good training. Sessions are focused on having a comprehensive approach to developing students’ literacy in all subjects and to better lesson planning. Training is helping teachers to be more rigorous in using information about students’ progress to set work matched to students’ ability. The impact of well-led personalised coaching by designated mentors for staff, coupled with effective training sessions, is reflected in the higher proportion of good quality teaching. The inclusion of teaching assistants in all staff training ensures they are more aware of their key role in students’ learning.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders continue to refine the new marking policy introduced in September 2012. This requires teachers to give more detailed feedback to students and for students to respond and improve their work. We saw good examples of this in mathematics and design technology, but less so in modern foreign languages and English.

p.2

Main findings

Your director of inclusion and the director for special educational needs from TKAT are gathering and regularly analysing better quality information about the achievement of disabled students and those with special educational needs. Regular meetings pinpoint any gaps between the progress of these students and their peers at the academy. The progress made by disabled students and those with special educational needs, remains a key weakness, notably in Year 9. This needs to be tackled as a priority over the next six months.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders are developing middle leaders’ capacity to observe the quality of teaching, assess its impact on students’ work over time, and to give constructive feedback to teachers. This is at an early stage of development. You plan to use a training programme for middle leaders devised by TKAT to develop this further.

p.2

Main findings

The governing body is supportive of recent changes and is becoming more effective. However, they have much ground to make up. Governors have been more active in seeking and responding to the views of sixth form students about teaching and the use of resources. Governors receive information about managing and rewarding teachers’ performance but are not asking sufficiently detailed questions about the relationship between teaching over time and its impact on students’ achievement. Governors have received training on interpreting achievement data and are better equipped to make comparisons between outcomes for students in the academy and students nationally. They do not yet focus sharply enough on how well gaps are closing, particularly for students eligible for pupil premium funding.

p.2

Main findings

The academy improvement plan sets challenging targets for students’ achievement and securing consistently good teaching. The plan will benefit from having more precision about the development of governance and more specific targets relating to the progress of different student groups, with clear timelines to evaluate how well these targets are being met.

p.3

Main findings

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The academy should take further action to:  refine the academy improvement plan with more emphasis on strengthening governance, and specific targets for the progress of student groups throughout Key Stage 3 and 4  ensure disabled students and those with special educational needs make more rapid progress  undertake a review of the governing body to assess training needs and strengthen its understanding and analysis of achievement information.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

There is no formal, regular support from the local authority. Nevertheless, the academy draws on valuable local authority human resources advice and support with contractual and staffing matters.

p.3

External support

Leaders from the Trust are providing good support. The combination of expertise from the director of the teaching school, the seconded deputy headteacher and director for special educational needs, is giving you additional capacity so that you can lead improvement work more swiftly at the academy. The chief executive and the progress advisor are making sure that expertise from across the family of TKAT academies is used strategically to suit the needs of Cleeve Park.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, The Kemnal Academies Trust, the Education Funding Agency and the Director of Children’s Services for Bexley.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion