Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 1 Jul 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Dilip Kadodwala

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Dilip Kadodwala

  • Postcode verified

    EN7 6LR

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+65Positivemore positive than 63% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivestrengthsambitiousinadequategood progressclearrobustimproving
Criticismweaknessesnot clearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
935
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Yvonne Devereux Headteacher St Paul's Catholic Primary School Park Lane Cheshunt EN7 6LR

p.1

Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 18 June 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in March 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I met with you, the deputy headteacher, the Chair and Vice Chair of the Governing Body and two other governors to discuss the actions being taken to improve the school. A telephone conversation was held with a representative of the local authority. A meeting was also held with a group of Year 6 pupils. I scrutinised a range of documents and you joined me on brief visits to all classes.

p.1

Context

Two members of staff will leave at the end of the summer term 2013. Four new teachers will start at the school in September 2013, including three newly qualified teachers. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0121 679 9166 Direct email :helen.johnson@serco.com

p.1

Main findings

You, other senior leaders and the governing body members are providing ambitious direction for the school’s improvement. You all have a good grasp of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. You are tackling weaknesses determinedly, resulting in clear improvements. There is now no inadequate teaching and there is an improvement in the proportion of good teaching. Teachers receive accurate feedback after lesson observations carried out by leaders and they follow up quickly on points for improvement. Strengths found at the last inspection are being sustained, for example in the Early Years Foundation Stage, and being developed further.

p.2

Main findings

You have explained to teachers what is expected of them and the rate at which they are expected to improve. Teachers and support staff have a clearer understanding about what counts as good progress in reading, writing and mathematics because of training they have received, including individual support for some teachers. You have also raised the ambition and skills of teaching assistants through effective coaching and have made sure that they also have robust performance management.

p.2

Main findings

Systems for checking how well pupils are progressing are established well and are supporting improvements in pupils’ skills in reading, writing and mathematics. Across the school, there is a sharper focus on improving pupils’ use of correct grammar and punctuation. The quality of consistent marking is better than that seen at the last inspection. There are more opportunities for pupils to investigate and solve problems in mathematics. Pupils I spoke to confirmed that teachers have raised their expectations about the quality and quantity of work produced by pupils. The displays of pupils’ work and other stimulating resources around the school, and in classes, also reflect leaders’ and teachers’ raised expectations and support pupils’ learning well. Teachers are making constructive use of what they learned about pupils’ work from their visit to an effective school because of clear guidance they received prior

p.2

Main findings

to their visit and checks carried out by senior leaders in lessons after the visit.

p.2

Main findings

Governors are very keen to secure improvements to teaching and learning quickly. They use their visits to lessons, accompanied by senior leaders, to develop their understanding of effective teaching and learning. Their grasp of pupils’ performance data is secure and enables them to ask sharp questions about the impact of actions being taken to raise standards in reading, writing and mathematics.

p.2

Main findings

The school improvement plan clearly deals with all of the areas identified in the last inspection. There are suitable, measurable success criteria to help check how teaching and learning are improving against challenging targets. However, the plan does not refer clearly enough to how much progress more-able pupils should be making in each year group. Senior leaders and governors are aware that staff changes in the autumn term 2013 present opportunities for rapid improvement, as well as potential risks. Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.2

Main findings

 make sure that the appointment of new qualified teachers from September this year continues to contribute to the pace of improvements in teaching and pupils’ progress  include in the school improvement plan how much progress more-able pupils are expected to make in reading, writing and mathematics in each year group; this should help leaders and governors to measure the success of teachers’ work.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The local authority’s improvement partner for the school has carried out lesson observations and reviewed pupils’ performance data. The headteacher has found this helpful. Local authority advisers have agreed levels of support from the start of the new academic year, for example in English and mathematics, and for supporting newly qualified teachers. The link with an effective school is proving useful in helping teachers to raise their expectations about the quality and quantity of work done by pupils in reading, writing and mathematics.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Hertfordshire, and the Archdiocese of Westminster.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion