Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 27 Jun 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Patricia Metham

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Patricia Metham

  • Postcode verified

    BN41 2WN

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+45Positivemore positive than 47% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseambitiousgood progressstrengthsenjoymentconfidentengagingenthusiasmeffective
Criticismweaknessnot alwaysunevennot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
753
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Ms S Mines Headteacher Mile Oak Primary School Graham Avenue Brighton BN41 2WN

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 7 June 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you and your deputy headteacher and with the Chair of the Governing Body. I also had a telephone conversation with the consultant working with your school on behalf of the local authority. The school action plan was evaluated. Information about pupils’ progress and attainment and minutes of governing body meetings since the section 5 inspection were reviewed.

p.1

Context

Since the last inspection, two substantive teachers have replaced two employed by the school on a temporary basis. Changes to the programme for pupils needing additional help mean that these pupils are seldom withdrawn from the mainstream curriculum; they are given individual help within lessons. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com

p.1

Main findings

Your school’s leaders, including its governors, share a clear and ambitious strategic vision and a readiness to take appropriate action to tackle areas of weakness and to build on current strengths. The introductory section of your action plan usefully breaks down the issues presented in the last inspection report into manageable sections, with realistic dates for completion. The plan as a whole, however, is repetitive and the targets are often too generalised to give planning and monitoring of progress the urgency and precision needed. It is not always clear who has hands- on responsibility for an initiative, who is to monitor its implementation and who is to evaluate its impact on pupils’ learning. The monitoring of teaching by senior leaders is regular but too little attention is paid to the impact teachers make on pupils’ progress over time when evaluating their effectiveness.

p.2

Main findings

The verve and inventiveness with which you and your staff persuade pupils and their families that reading is both a fundamental aspect of learning and a source of shared and individual enjoyment have created a confident and engaging school culture. The proportion of pupils gaining above average reading levels by the end of Year 6 has increased since 2011. Similar initiatives to improve pupils’ writing are beginning to have an impact. Boys as well as girls across the age and ability range respond with enthusiasm and thought to your deputy headteacher’s invitation to bring him pieces they have written independently. Not all groups are yet making good progress. As you acknowledge, more needs to be done to improve the achievement of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals. Literacy levels across the school remain uneven, particularly in Years 4 and 5 and in the Reception class. This unevenness is

p.2

Main findings

now being tackled through a more systematic approach to the development of core skills. Government funding (the Pupil Premium) has provided well-directed, additional teaching assistant support for disadvantaged and vulnerable pupils.

p.2

Main findings

In summary, senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further steps to:

p.2

Main findings

 make the action plan succinct and precise, with specific and measurable targets that make progress easier to track, and with greater clarity about roles and responsibilities  ensure that the evaluation of teaching correlates with up-to-date information about pupils’ achievement.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The local authority provides useful support through its monitoring of the school’s progress towards improved teaching and learning, through consultancy and relevant training for the governors. The school also benefits from the University of Brighton’s programme for gifted and talented pupils, from active involvement with the Portslade cluster of schools and from participation by your coordinator for special educational needs support in the Hove cluster of schools.

p.2

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Brighton and Hove.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion