Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 28 Jun 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

John Daniell

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Daniell

  • Postcode verified

    SG2 0HS

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+21Mostly positivemore positive than 35% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseconsistentlyinadequatepositivelyeffectivelyeffectiveclearlyimprovingsecure
Criticismweaknessrequires improvementinconsistentnot consistently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings486w+21
  • What needs to improve228w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
711
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%What needs to improve 32%

Full report text

Mrs Cathy Tooze Executive Headteacher The Nobel School Mobbsbury Way Stevenage SG2 0HS

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to The Nobel School

Following my visit to your school on 12 June 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to The Nobel School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in March 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I held meetings with you and other senior leaders, the headteacher (designate), a group of students, four members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I evaluated the school improvement plan. I also visited a number of lessons briefly, accompanied by you, to gauge the quality of teaching.

p.1

Context

Since the previous inspection, the headteacher has taken early retirement, and a substantive headteacher has been appointed for September 2013. A teacher of science has left the school. The new school building is now fully open. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0121 6799158 Direct email :rachel.dayan@serco.com

p.1

Main findings

Your improvement plan, which currently covers the period up until July 2013, correctly identifies key points for improvement and clearly indicates how the impact of the plan will be measured. Plans are in place for the headteacher (designate) to extend the plan into the next school year. The bi-weekly ‘Action Group’ meetings involving senior leaders, local authority and governors are a good way to ensure accountability and rigour.

p.2

Main findings

Teachers are starting to use information on students’ progress in a smarter way, and consequently the quality of teaching is improving. No teaching is consistently inadequate; however the proportion of teaching that requires improvement is still too large. The main weakness of teaching in the school is that not all teachers plan and deliver lessons that match the capabilities of all students in the class. Marking is mostly regular and helpful. However, teachers do not follow the revised system of telling students how well they have done and how they can improve consistently. Students told me there are more opportunities to learn independently, particularly in humanities subjects.

p.2

Main findings

You and the executive deputy headteacher have worked well with the school’s existing leaders and managers in establishing higher expectations and systems which aim to secure greater accountability. You are developing the leadership of subject and year heads. However, leadership at this level remains inconsistent, and you have identified a need to ensure that these leaders act on findings of their monitoring in order to have a greater impact on students’ progress.

p.2

Main findings

Members of the governing body have responded positively to the outcome of the last inspection. They are considering how effectively they are offering both challenge and support.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.2

Main findings

 Increase the proportion of good and better teaching.  Ensure that recently introduced systems and procedures, including the marking policy, are applied consistently by all staff.  Identify areas for development among middle leaders, and provide appropriate support and challenge to strengthen capacity at this level.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The School Effectiveness Advisor, who spends one day a week in the school, has provided valuable support to the school’s leaders, managers and governors through conducting learning walks and working with the governing body on what the school needs to do to improve. Good use has been made of the executive headteacher’s school to provide suitable training and support for teachers who need to develop their practice, and for leaders whose role involves judging the quality of the teaching they observe.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Hertfordshire.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion