Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
John Daniell
- Postcode verified
SG2 0HS
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Following my visit to your school on 12 June 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. p.1
- Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection. p.1
- The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in March 2013. p.1
- It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. p.1
- During the visit, I held meetings with you and other senior leaders, the headteacher (designate), a group of students, four members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. p.1
- I evaluated the school improvement plan. p.1
- I also visited a number of lessons briefly, accompanied by you, to gauge the quality of teaching. p.1
- Since the previous inspection, the headteacher has taken early retirement, and a substantive headteacher has been appointed for September 2013. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 711
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 42, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs Cathy Tooze Executive Headteacher The Nobel School Mobbsbury Way Stevenage SG2 0HS
p.1
Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to The Nobel School
Following my visit to your school on 12 June 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to The Nobel School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in March 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, I held meetings with you and other senior leaders, the headteacher (designate), a group of students, four members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I evaluated the school improvement plan. I also visited a number of lessons briefly, accompanied by you, to gauge the quality of teaching.
p.1
Context
Since the previous inspection, the headteacher has taken early retirement, and a substantive headteacher has been appointed for September 2013. A teacher of science has left the school. The new school building is now fully open. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0121 6799158 Direct email :rachel.dayan@serco.com
p.1
Main findings
Your improvement plan, which currently covers the period up until July 2013, correctly identifies key points for improvement and clearly indicates how the impact of the plan will be measured. Plans are in place for the headteacher (designate) to extend the plan into the next school year. The bi-weekly ‘Action Group’ meetings involving senior leaders, local authority and governors are a good way to ensure accountability and rigour.
p.2
Main findings
Teachers are starting to use information on students’ progress in a smarter way, and consequently the quality of teaching is improving. No teaching is consistently inadequate; however the proportion of teaching that requires improvement is still too large. The main weakness of teaching in the school is that not all teachers plan and deliver lessons that match the capabilities of all students in the class. Marking is mostly regular and helpful. However, teachers do not follow the revised system of telling students how well they have done and how they can improve consistently. Students told me there are more opportunities to learn independently, particularly in humanities subjects.
p.2
Main findings
You and the executive deputy headteacher have worked well with the school’s existing leaders and managers in establishing higher expectations and systems which aim to secure greater accountability. You are developing the leadership of subject and year heads. However, leadership at this level remains inconsistent, and you have identified a need to ensure that these leaders act on findings of their monitoring in order to have a greater impact on students’ progress.
p.2
Main findings
Members of the governing body have responded positively to the outcome of the last inspection. They are considering how effectively they are offering both challenge and support.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.2
Main findings
Increase the proportion of good and better teaching. Ensure that recently introduced systems and procedures, including the marking policy, are applied consistently by all staff. Identify areas for development among middle leaders, and provide appropriate support and challenge to strengthen capacity at this level.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The School Effectiveness Advisor, who spends one day a week in the school, has provided valuable support to the school’s leaders, managers and governors through conducting learning walks and working with the governing body on what the school needs to do to improve. Good use has been made of the executive headteacher’s school to provide suitable training and support for teachers who need to develop their practice, and for leaders whose role involves judging the quality of the teaching they observe.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Hertfordshire.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion