Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Honywood School

Inspected 7 Jun 2013 · published 26 Jun 2013 · URN 136729

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    7 Jun 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Ariane Roberts, James Coyle, Piers Ranger, Sian Sewell

  • Leadership and management AI-checked

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    CO6 1PZ

  • Name on report verified

    The Honywood Community Science School

  • URN verified

    136729

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+46Positivemore positive than 9% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingvery welleffectivelyexemplaryinspirationaleffectivehigh expectationsconsistently
Criticismnot alwaysweakerrequires improvementinadequatenot yetseriousweaknessesnot outstanding

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1420w+55
  • Leadership752w+22
  • What needs to improve117w+73

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,206
shorter than usual (typical 2966)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 48
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 47%Leadership 25%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 25%

Full report text

The Honywood Community Science School Westfield Drive, Coggeshall, Colchester, CO6 1PZ

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Not previously inspected This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Outstanding 1 Leadership and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a good school.  Students consistently achieve well in English and mathematics.  Teachers have high expectations for their students and create a positive climate for learning.  Teaching is typically good and sometimes outstanding, and lessons are adapted to ensure that all ability groups achieve well.  Students’ attitudes to learning are exemplary. The approach to learning they develop at Honywood prepares them very well for the next stage of their education or training.  Attendance rates are rising and are above average and exclusion rates are now in line with the average.  Students are proud of their school. They get on very well with each other, staff and other adults. Their behaviour is impeccable and they feel safe in school.  The inspirational headteacher ensures staff have a shared ambition that is focused on improving teaching and raising students’ overall achievement.  As a result the school is improving rapidly.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

Pupils currently in the school are making better progress than previous years.  Governors provide able support and challenge to school leaders on behalf of staff, students and parents.

p.1

It is not yet an outstanding school because

 Marking and written feedback do not always help students to improve their work.  In the small number of weaker lessons, teachers do not ask students challenging questions to make them think and try harder.  Students do not do so well in every subject; modern languages have been a weaker area.  Leaders do not always use the detailed information collected about students’ progress effectively to improve achievement.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed 31 lessons, six of which were seen together with senior leaders. In addition, the inspection team attended an assembly and made a number of short visits around the school.  Meetings were held with four groups of students, four governors, school staff, including subject leaders, and a representative of the local authority.  Inspectors analysed the 118 responses to the online questionnaire (Parent View), four emails and one letter from parents, and the 62 responses to the staff questionnaire.  They observed the work of the school and looked carefully at numerous documents, including checks on teaching, records of governors’ meetings, case studies relating to exclusions, support for vulnerable students, and policies and records relating to students’ achievement, attendance, punctuality, behaviour, safety, bullying and safeguarding.

p.2

Inspection team

James Coyle, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Ariane Roberts Additional Inspector Sian Sewell Additional Inspector Piers Ranger Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 This larger-than-average secondary school serves students in the Braintree area of Essex.  The school converted to academy status in May 2011. When the predecessor school of the same name was last inspected by Ofsted in 2009, it was judged to be outstanding.  The majority of students are of White British heritage. Very few speak English as an additional language, and the proportion of students from minority ethnic backgrounds is well below average.  The proportion of disabled students and those who have special educational needs supported at school action is broadly average, but the proportion supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is above average.  The proportion of students supported by the pupil premium is well below average. In this school this additional government funding applies to students who are known to be eligible for free school meals, or are in local authority care.

p.3

Information about this school

 The school has a specialism in science.  A number of students in Key Stage 4 take work-related courses at Colchester Institute.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for students’ attainment and progress.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the quality of teaching and learning so that more teaching is good or outstanding, by: – ensuring that marking and written feedback to students are consistently helpful, and that they act upon this guidance in order to progress faster and achieve better – routinely using effective questioning in lessons so that students are challenged to meet and exceed their targets.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Ensure that all students who take GCSE in modern foreign languages gain the grades they should.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Ensure that leaders and managers at all levels: – use information about students’ progress more effectively to accurately analyse their performance across all areas of the school, set challenging targets and so ensure they make greater progress.

p.3

The achievement of pupils is good

 Students start at the school with attainment levels that vary from average to well above average, and their progress in English and mathematics compares well with national figures. Achievement is not outstanding because students do not make the rapid and sustained progress across all subjects that would enable them to attain even higher results.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 For some years the percentage of students achieving five A* to C passes at GCSE including English and mathematics has been consistently above average, and as a result students are well prepared for the next stage of their education and training.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 In 2012, the attainment of students who were eligible for the pupil premium, as indicated by their performance at GCSE, was on average three quarters of a grade lower in English than those of all other students in the school. In mathematics, average grades were in line with other students. In both of these subjects, the gap was smaller than nationally, but their progress in English was comparatively slow. Current eligible pupils are making good progress in English, especially in Years 7 and 8, and the gap is narrowing.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 The progress made by disabled students and those who have special educational needs has also improved since 2012, and is also better in Years 7 and 8 than higher up the school. It is good overall. These students are encouraged to opt into extra support such as one-to-one sessions to improve their attainment.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 The small number of students from minority ethnic groups and those who speak English as an additional language make similar progress to that of other students in the school.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 The promotion of reading is led by the English department. Students’ reading levels are tested on entry to the school, and support is provided for those who are dyslexic or have lower reading ages. By the end of Year 8 they have increased their reading ages by two to three years. Boys are encouraged to read through the promotion of the e-library and new books are advertised in the school’s weekly gazette. Almost all the Year 7 students heard reading were fluent and read for pleasure. In lessons observed, reading levels were good and students were able to read with confidence.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 The school has introduced a programme to promote students’ writing, communication and mathematics skills across the school. A focus on key words is a feature in many subjects, including music and art, and good speaking and communication skills were seen in use across the school.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 All students are entered early for GCSE mathematics in Year 11, and generally attain good results. Depending on individual results and in discussion with parents, some students retake their examinations.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Practical subjects such as business studies, media, music and dance and physical education provide suitable opportunities for the students who take them. They attain well and progress to further study.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Following discussions with Year 10 students and parents, the school offers work-related courses, including some on basic skills in English, mathematics and science, and appropriate work experience placements through Colchester Institute. Students who attend achieve well and progress to courses at a higher level.  Students make slower progress in modern foreign languages, specifically German, than in other subjects. Results show that in 2012 many pupils with special educational needs underachieved in this subject.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Teaching across most subjects and year groups including English and mathematics is good and some is outstanding. This leads to good progress being made by students.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Teachers have high expectations of students in terms of both behaviour and learning. The best teaching makes sure that tasks and explanations are matched to students’ individual needs so that they learn well. In one outstanding Year 8 English lesson, questioning was used well to reshape an activity on ‘how could you do this in a different way’ as students sorted out cards into categories. In a good Year 7 mathematics lesson students worked well on their own while an additional support assistant worked productively with individual students. In an outstanding Year 9 biology lesson the teacher clarified scientific terms so that both more-able students as well as those needing support better understood what they were learning.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 A review of books, tablet computers and discussions with students revealed inconsistencies in the way teachers approach assessment in different subjects. The best practice involves clear, focused targets for improvement, but in others closed comments such as ‘well done’ are common, leaving students to decide whether or how to take on feedback. There is no overarching school policy on marking.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Well-qualified learning support assistants are used effectively across a range of subjects. The school approach is to encourage students to refer themselves when seeking advice, guidance and support. Students were observed getting help from learning support assistants on a one-to- one basis for punctuation in English and verbs in French, and advice on addressing gaps in coursework as well as the literacy support in Years 7 and 8.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 While much teaching is good or outstanding, a small amount requires improvement. In a science lesson, for example, the teacher did not ask students questions in a way that pushed them to think through a problem and come up with a response. Too often in these weaker lessons the teacher provides the solution, and too quickly, so misses a good opportunity to challenge the students.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Survey returns from parents and carers indicate that the large majority consider their child to be taught well.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding

 Students say they enjoy being at the school. This borne out by their punctuality in getting to class, exemplary attitudes to learning, and impeccable behaviour in and around the school.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding

 Staff and parents overwhelmingly support this judgement. Survey results point to the strong relationships between students and their teachers and the self-discipline shown by students contributing to the school being a safe and secure place in which to learn.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding

 Attendance rates continue to rise and are now above average and exclusions have fallen since 2011. These improvements are largely due to the family learning team working with vulnerable families. They work effectively to maintain the improvements, as well as supporting the reintegration of students into mainstream lessons.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding

 Bullying is rare, whether in the form of racist, physical, homophobic or e-bullying. Students know what to do if it occurs, and the school in turn has effective measures to deal with it.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding

 The students, including those who attend courses with the local institute, have an excellent understanding of how to keep themselves and each other safe.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding

 Tutor time, assemblies and focus days contribute very well to students’ personal, social and health education, as part of a very effective social, moral, spiritual and cultural programme.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The headteacher is inspirational in conveying a collaborative approach to learning that is shared by governors, all leaders, managers and staff. As a result there is a united focus on developing and improving learning opportunities for students in order to drive achievement higher.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Leaders use effective systems to monitor teachers’ performance and improve their classroom practice. However, the school recognises that leaders at all levels do not yet make the best possible use of the information collected on students’ performance to drive improvement. For example, the wealth of information collected on the progress made by specific groups of students, and particularly those whose circumstances make them vulnerable, is not always analysed effectively to track their progress, set challenging targets or identify trends.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The range of subjects offered by the school meet the needs of students effectively. New arrangements in Years 7 and 8 provide an early focus for students on the learning approaches required for studying GCSE subjects. Work-related courses off-site provide a suitable range of alternative options to cater for students’ learning styles and abilities, whilst allowing opportunities for access to further courses.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The way the school’s science specialism is structured has been revised. Subjects are now offered as academic GCSEs rather than work-related provision, in line with the school’s move to offer more academic subjects for all students.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Senior leaders are aware of the low achievement figures for modern languages, specifically German. The 2012 GCSE results were above those of 2011, but they are clear that improving achievement in modern languages remains a priority for the school.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The Parent View survey shows that the majority of respondents share positive views about the school.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Focus days promote students’ personal development well. Visits also develop leadership skills for students from across the school, and involve parents. Timetabled tutor-time programmes broaden cultural awareness, a weekly ‘pause for thought’ reflects religious beliefs across all year groups, and themed assemblies include external speakers on range of social and moral issues. Such activities promote spiritual, social, moral and cultural development very effectively across the school.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The local authority has maintained links with the school since it converted to academy status. It has provided advice and guidance on data analysis, and supported the school’s research-based programme for improving teaching skills. Governors have benefited from training on self- evaluation and access to online information resources. The local authority has also provided county-wide forums for other headteachers to share some of the approaches taken by the school, for example its development of the family learning initiative.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The governance of the school: – The governors use effective policies and systems to monitor the school’s performance, and challenge leaders to effectively maintain and drive improvements to students’ achievement. They receive and check data on how well students achieve compared to similar schools nationally. They monitor the performance of the headteacher and staff, and ensure that any promotion or pay rise is linked to targets that include students’ achievement. They manage finances, including the use of pupil premium funding, efficiently. There are link governors for disadvantaged students, safeguarding and family learning. Governors regularly visit the school to meet with staff, students and parents and sometimes observe classes. They make sure that national safeguarding requirements are met, including checks on students’ attendance at the institute.

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.8

School details

Unique reference number 136729 Local authority Essex Inspection number 411982

p.9

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.9

School details

Type of school Academy converter School category Non-maintained Age range of pupils 11–16 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 1044 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Jeff Carter Headteacher Simon Mason Date of previous school inspection Not previously inspected Telephone number 01376 561231 Fax number 01376 563067 Email address admin@honywoodschool.com guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.10

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.10

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.10

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion