Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Brian Cartwright
- Postcode verified
B44 9SR
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- During the visit, meetings were held with you, other senior leaders, teachers, the Governing Body, representatives of the local authority, a representative of the Diocese, and the headteacher of the partner outstanding school to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. p.1
- The school is partnered with a nearby outstanding school, whose headteacher is a National Leader in Education. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 745
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs C Stewardson Headteacher Cardinal Wiseman Catholic Technology College Old Oscott Hill Kingstanding Birmingham B44 9SR
p.1
Catholic Technology College
Following my visit to your school on 07 June 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Catholic Technology College
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in March 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with you, other senior leaders, teachers, the Governing Body, representatives of the local authority, a representative of the Diocese, and the headteacher of the partner outstanding school to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The school action plan was evaluated. We conducted a joint learning walk round the school and looked at samples of students’ work. I scrutinised minutes of meetings of the governing body, local authority notes of visit, and evaluative reviews of some departments.
p.1
Main findings
Staff have embraced the findings of the recent inspection and are optimistic about the opportunities it has given to develop their teaching. Teachers have paired up with colleagues to complement each other’s expertise in literacy, planning and encouraging student talk in lessons. This allows every teacher to observe good Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0121 679 9168 Direct email :beverley.joyner@serco.com practice, and be observed themselves once a week, as they develop their literacy and planning skills. Teachers are quickly and effectively identifying what aspects of teaching they need to improve. The clear, common coaching lesson observation record provides good development feedback to teachers and requires them to set targets for next week’s teaching. This is starting to improve student progress,
p.1
Main findings
particularly in their verbal communication skills. However, grading these coaching lessons risks confusion with the more formal teacher performance management judgements and the latter’s focus on the impact of teaching over time.
p.2
Main findings
The school action plan is adequate in that it addresses the key Ofsted improvement points. It does not have sufficient, sharp enough student outcome indicators that would confirm the impact of the plan. It also includes additional actions that are not part of the Ofsted improvement list, and therefore risks distracting teachers away from the key issues.
p.2
Main findings
Governing Body minutes since the previous inspection lack summary evaluations or clear records of decisions. The strategic vision of governors is not clear from these notes or from my discussions. For example, the school is planning to recruit six ‘Teach First’ trainee teachers for September 2013, although the strategic reason to do so is not clear. The appointment of a literacy coordinator, for example, has been proposed for some time, but there is no clear brief for the post. Oversight of literacy is shared between different senior leaders. Fortunately, a recently appointed associate governor brings her considerable expertise in developing school literacy and has made a substantial impact on staff training and advice. The Governing Body has arranged for an independent review of its effectiveness later this month.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle most of the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.2
Main findings
complete the planned review of the effectiveness of the governing body and respond quickly to its recommendations.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The school is partnered with a nearby outstanding school, whose headteacher is a National Leader in Education. That support is catalysing the improvement work in literacy, lesson planning, and middle leader professional development. Further opportunities, and financial resources, exist to support senior leaders. The partnership school’s senior leadership team is conducting a series of evaluative subject reviews. These reviews make succinct and sometimes hard-hitting independent judgements. Those reports would provide powerful evidence to governors on pupil performance, together with the quality of subject provision. The local authority is providing support for you and governors through training events. I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Birmingham and as below.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion