Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Matthew Haynes
- Postcode verified
MK3 7NA
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes8
“As a result, there has been good progress since the inspection.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 676
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs W Smith Headteacher Barleyhurst Park Primary Forfar Drive Milton Keynes MK3 7NA
p.1
School
Following my visit to your school on 22 May 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in March 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit I met with you, other senior leaders, four governors including the Chair of Governors, and a representative of the local authority. We visited every class to see the pupils at work. I looked at pupils’ books and teachers’ planning. I scrutinised a range documents, including the school’s improvement plan.
p.1
Context
One teacher has retired and another will be leaving on 31 May 2013. One of these posts has been filled and the appointment process for the other post is underway. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com
p.1
Main findings
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The revised improvement plan shows clearly what actions will be taken in order to improve the school. They are the right actions. Teachers, leaders and governors are determined to make these improvements. There are challenging targets for raising standards in the plan, and actions aimed at improving the achievement of different groups of pupils (for example, pupils eligible for free school meals). The headteacher has made the elements of good teaching clear to all staff, and she expects teaching to improve rapidly.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders have acted quickly and effectively. As a result, there has been good progress since the inspection. Teachers now plan lessons that aim to stretch all pupils. Leaders check teachers’ planning every week, and look at pupils’ books weekly to make sure pupils are being challenged effectively. A training programme for teachers is now in place, aimed at the key elements of teaching that need to improve. Individual teachers are also getting bespoke support from leaders. Marking in mathematics is getting better because pupils are given more opportunities to make the improvements suggested by teachers. The school’s information about pupils’ achievement is detailed, although it is not clear what proportion of pupils are making more than expected progress.
p.2
Main findings
The governing body has had training to help them analyse information about pupils’ achievement, including the kinds of questions governors ought to be asking of leaders. This means that they are better placed to effectively challenge the school. The Chair of Governors has begun some training specific to his role. Governors have been involved in the development of the improvement plan, but their role in evaluating the school’s progress is unclear.
p.2
Main findings
The local authority is providing effective support. The improvement partner visits the school regularly to measure its progress. His reports make clear judgements and recommendations based on a range of appropriate evidence. He has brokered support for the school, for example from a mathematics consultant. He has also made links with other local schools, for example Bishop Parker Catholic School, so teachers can visit them to observe high quality teaching.
p.2
Main findings
Following the visit to the school, HMI recommend that further action is taken to:
p.2
Main findings
develop the school’s information about pupils’ progress so leaders, governors and teachers are clear about the proportions of pupils making more than expected progress clarify how governors will evaluate the school’s progress. Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
Main findings
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Milton Keynes. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion