Other · Ofsted report
SGS Forest High School
Summary
Grahame Sherfield (lead), Brian Netto, Karl Sampson
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
23 May 2013
- Inspectors verified
Brian Netto, Grahame Sherfield, Karl Sampson
- Postcode verified
GL14 2AZ
- Name on report verified
Forest E-ACT Academy
- URN verified
138496
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Students’ achievement is not consistently good across the academy and, for students in Year 11, it is below the level expected. p.1
- Many students, particularly boys, find it more difficult to make progress, because of their weak skills in reading and writing. p.1
- Teaching is not yet consistently good enough, despite recent improvements, to secure good achievement for all. p.1
- Not all teachers plan work that is at the right level of difficulty for all students in the class. p.1
- As a result, work is sometimes too easy or too difficult for some and progress is slower than it should be. p.1
- New approaches adopted by academy leaders have not yet resulted in achievement and teaching that are consistently good. p.1
- Information from the monitoring of teaching is not used sharply enough to focus on the further improvements needed. p.1
- Accelerate students’ progress in their subjects, particularly by boys in English, by setting targets based on more than the nationally expected rates of progress by the end of Year 11. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 2,016
- longer than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Forest E-ACT Academy Causeway Road, Cinderford, Gloucestershire, GL14 2AZ
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Not previously inspected This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Requires improvement 3
p.1
This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because
Students’ achievement is not consistently good across the academy and, for students in Year 11, it is below the level expected. Many students, particularly boys, find it more difficult to make progress, because of their weak skills in reading and writing. Teaching is not yet consistently good enough, despite recent improvements, to secure good achievement for all. Not all teachers plan work that is at the right level of difficulty for all students in the class. As a result, work is sometimes too easy or too difficult for some and progress is slower than it should be. New approaches adopted by academy leaders have not yet resulted in achievement and teaching that are consistently good. Information from the monitoring of teaching is not used sharply enough to focus on the further improvements needed.
p.1
The school has the following strengths
The Principal, governors and senior leaders are firmly committed to improving all students’ achievement rapidly. This urgency is widely shared by the staff, and better progress and improved teaching are now evident. Students’ behaviour is good. They are generally keen to learn and report that they feel safe in the orderly and calm atmosphere of the academy. The academy works effectively to include all students in its community. It provides good support for those with particular social or emotional needs.
p.1
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed 17 lessons, of which five were joint observations with a member of the academy’s senior leadership team, as well as four other occasions when learning was taking place. An inspector toured the academy with a senior member of staff to make observations of a series of lessons and focused on the quality of provision for students with disabilities or with special educational needs. Meetings were held with the Chair and members of the Governing Body, a representative from E-ACT, the academy’s sponsor, and with senior and middle leaders as well as two groups of students. Inspectors took account of the 12 responses to the online Parent View survey. Inspectors looked at key documents, including the academy’s plans for improvement, the minutes of meetings of the governing body, the academy’s data on students’ progress, records relating to the academy’s own assessment of how well it is doing, behaviour and attendance
p.2
Information about this inspection
policies, procedures for safeguarding and samples of students’ work.
p.2
Inspection team
Grahame Sherfield, Lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Brian Netto Additional Inspector Karl Sampson Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.2
Information about this school
The Forest E-ACT Academy opened in September 2012 in the accommodation of its predecessor, Heywood Community School. The academy is well below average in size and serves a mainly White British community in the Forest of Dean. The proportion of disabled students and those who have special educational needs and need extra help is below average, both for those supported through school action, and for those supported through school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs. The proportion of students known to be eligible for the pupil premium (additional government funding in this academy for looked after children and those known to be eligible for free school meals) is above that found nationally. Off-site provision for a small number of students, generally for one day a week, is made through Gloucestershire College. The academy does not yet have published data to determine whether it meets the government’s
p.3
Information about this school
current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for students’ attainment and progress.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of teaching so that it is good or better by ensuring that: work is at the right level of difficulty for all students so that they are fully engaged in their learning and make rapid progress students articulate and refine their ideas orally to help them in their writing students respond to their teachers’ marking routinely and discuss with their teachers how best to improve their work. Accelerate students’ progress in their subjects, particularly by boys in English, by setting targets based on more than the nationally expected rates of progress by the end of Year 11. Improve the leadership and management of teaching by using information from monitoring and evaluation to focus more sharply on tackling remaining weaknesses so that students’ progress over time is accelerated.
p.3
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
Achievement requires improvement because students’ progress remains below nationally expected levels. However, progress is improving. For example, in Year 10, progress in English and mathematics is similar to that expected nationally. Staff continue to work, with some success, on narrowing the gap between girls’ and boys’ progress in English. In lessons where activities are not at the right level of difficulty, students’ attention tends to wander and this hinders learning. Students join the academy with attainment that is significantly below average, particularly in reading and writing. As a result of concerted action, the academy’s data indicate that in the examinations this summer, Year 11 students are set to exceed the government’s current floor standard for the proportion attaining five GCSEs at grades A* to C including English and mathematics. Attainment, however, remains below average. Disabled students and those with special educational needs make similar progress to their peers.
p.4
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
Particularly effective support is provided for those with social and emotional problems that make learning difficult. In most lessons, students sustain their concentration effectively. Relationships with staff and behaviour are good. They respond particularly well to teachers’ enthusiasm and to activities that are carefully designed to ensure the right level of challenge. The academy’s approach to early entry for GCSE mathematics does not limit the potential of more able students. Students are entered early but this is in order to build confidence and provide a platform for improvement in the subject. They take the examination again in the summer. The academy has had some success in closing the gap in attainment between those known to be eligible for the pupil premium and their peers. For example, in English and mathematics in Year 11, the gap has narrowed and the attainment of students receiving this additional support is now
p.4
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
about a quarter of a grade lower in each subject.
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
There is not yet enough good teaching to bring about consistently good progress by the students. Where teaching is good, it has often not been good for long enough to tackle weaknesses in students’ knowledge, understanding and skills. Where teaching requires improvement, it is sometimes because teachers do not help students to articulate their ideas more clearly so that they have greater support when they write about them. On occasions, teachers do not check students’ learning as the lesson progresses. Consequently, they do not adjust the activities so that all students can make good progress. Teaching is improving as academy leaders hold teachers more rigorously to account for the progress of their students in lessons and, increasingly, over longer periods of time. Students interviewed by inspectors identified that their teachers expect more of them now. Some teachers are skilled in developing students’ literacy skills, such as explaining how best to
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
structure their writing, and adjusting activities well to maximise students’ learning. Teaching is good or better when teachers plan activities that are based on a firm understanding of students’ strengths and weaknesses and ask probing questions to check their understanding as the lesson progresses. In an outstanding Year 9 physical education lesson, the teacher maintained a brisk, purposeful pace. She used her good knowledge of the students’ varying capabilities to provide activities to help them to develop their skills in the triple jump. In addition, she modelled the good use of language, asking effective questions to check and extend their understanding. As a result, students enjoyed the lesson and made rapid progress. Teachers’ marking is improving. There is now much more consistent practice that makes clear to students what they have done well and how to improve their work. Students do not routinely
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
respond to teachers’ marking or develop a dialogue where the teacher sets the student further challenges and checks the student’s response later.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
The academy’s ‘Behaviour for Learning’ approach, involving the careful application of ‘rewards’ and ‘consequences’, has led to improvements in behaviour that are recognised by the students. Behaviour at breaks and lunchtimes is good. Students are polite and well-mannered. They get on well with each other and with the staff. In lessons, most students get on with their work well. A few students report that behaviour varies in lessons when occasionally the work is too challenging or too easy. Students report that bullying is rare, mostly related to minor disagreements, and is effectively tackled by staff. Students are generally well informed about contemporary issues, such as cyber-bullying and homophobic bullying and the dangers that might be encountered online. They say that while most staff tackle students’ occasional use of inappropriate language, a few do not. Students in need of a little extra help are well cared for and the academy makes good use of the
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
support of other agencies. Provision in the ‘Stepzone’ for students who need extra help in order to settle to their work is good. Attendance has improved as a result of effective action to promote its importance. It is now broadly average. The academy is wisely beginning to work with its partner primary schools on a joint approach to tackling absence in the local area.
p.5
The leadership and management require improvement
Leaders have a realistic view of how well the academy is doing. The Principal and senior staff recognise the importance of improving teaching and have an accurate view of its quality. The ‘Accelerated Progress’ document, drawn up in February 2013, sets out clear expectations of staff, who report that they are being held accountable for students’ progress much more rigorously. Data on students’ progress are collected regularly and the progress of individuals is checked carefully in the frequent meetings of the Targeted Accountabilities Group. Since February 2013, targets have been based on the progress expected nationally and senior leaders are rightly soon to set targets based on exceeding this, in order to accelerate progress further. The academy’s development plan sets out clearly the progress made, with a small number of priorities. It does not include key actions to be taken by leaders to achieve the set priorities nor
p.5
The leadership and management require improvement
how and when progress is to be monitored. A good start has been made in improving teaching and all staff have a better understanding of the importance of the impact of teaching on students’ progress. Objectives for teachers to improve their teaching have been focused on achieving all of the teachers’ standards that the academy is using but these have not identified precisely enough which are the most important for individuals or groups to work on. Subject leadership is strengthening, particularly in English and mathematics. Through short visits to lessons in their departments, subject leaders have a better understanding of the quality of teaching and learning and are committed to playing their part in bringing about improvements. The curriculum is addressing students’ literacy needs through the energetic and wide-ranging ways in which literacy is promoted. This includes a whole-academy approach to reading in tutor
p.5
The leadership and management require improvement
time as well as Year 9 or Year 10 ‘reading buddies’ for weaker Year 7 readers and one-to-one support for those who need it in Years 7, 8 and 9. Good plans are in place to widen the range of GCSE subjects available in 2013/14. Pupil premium funding supports a good range of extra help for students, including support by a higher-level teaching assistant, mentoring and additional help in the ‘Stepzone’. Carefully considered and effective use is made of off-site provision and checks are made on students’ progress and well-being. Students receive good support in making decisions about education, training and employment after the age of 16. Links with partner primary schools are developing well and pupils from these schools regularly visit the academy, for example for ‘Academy Tradition’ events. Spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is promoted effectively. Students benefit from the opportunities for older students to work with younger ones and through taking on leadership
p.5
The leadership and management require improvement
roles in sport or mathematics. The academy tackles discrimination in a way that promotes tolerance and harmony. The sponsor challenges the academy’s performance and visits from advisers to review progress with improvements make a positive contribution to its development. Training to assist in improving teaching further and in helping staff to address some students’ difficulties with reading has not taken place yet but is due to start soon. The governance of the school: Governors recognise that students’ progress is not good enough and are challenging the academy to improve this rapidly. The governing body is using the development plan and reports from the sponsor’s advisers effectively to check on improvements and to ask challenging questions of the academy’s leaders. Governors have not yet undertaken training on the academy’s systems for collecting information about students’ progress. This is due to take place shortly.
p.6
The leadership and management require improvement
Governors are determined that weaknesses in teaching are tackled quickly and are committed to ensuring that pay awards depend on the progress made by students that teachers bring about.
p.6
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.7
School details
Unique reference number 138496 Local authority Gloucestershire Inspection number 422010
p.8
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Type of school Academy sponsor-led School category Community Age range of pupils 11–16 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 317 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Neill Ricketts Principal Tanya Prosser Date of previous school inspection Not previously inspected Telephone number 01594 822257 Fax number 01594 822257 Email address admin@foreste-actacademy.org.uk guidance ‘Raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.9
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.9
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.9
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion