Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 17 Jun 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Shirley Gornall

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Shirley Gornall

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+44Positivemore positive than 47% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisehigh qualityimprovedpositiverobustclearclearlythoughtfulimproving
Criticismweaknesses

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings225w0
  • Leadership392w+44

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
617
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 35%Leadership 61%About the inspection 4%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566 937 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: jsimmons@cfbt.com

p.1

Mrs C Holgate Acting Headteacher Lowerhouse Junior School Liverpool Road Burnley Lancashire BB12 6LN

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Lowerhouse Junior School

Following my visit to your school on 21 May 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school's recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Lowerhouse Junior School

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures following the inspection which took place in January 2013.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, meetings were held with the acting headteacher, executive headteacher, Chair of the Governing Body and two representatives of the local authority. The local authority's statement of action and the school's improvement plan were evaluated.

p.1

Context

The headteacher at the time of the last inspection retired on 30 April. The deputy headteacher has been appointed as acting headteacher until 31 December 2013. She is supported by an executive headteacher, who is the experienced substantive headteacher of another junior school from within the local authority, and is also a Local Leader of Education. An experienced deputy headteacher, seconded from another Lancashire school, will join the staff on a temporary basis on 3 June 2013.

p.1

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school-improvement plan addresses all the weaknesses that were identified in the section 5 inspection. It is well written and includes clear success criteria and arrangements for leaders and governors to check on the impact of actions they are taking. The acting headteacher is implementing the plan systematically and rigorously. The school’s plan dovetails with the local authority’s plan. The support from local authority consultants and advisers is clearly documented and appropriately targeted. Local authority consultants are working with the acting headteacher to implement a coaching programme to improve the quality of teaching. Teachers have agreed standards to follow with regard to lesson planning and marking. School leaders are checking lessons and pupils’ books regularly to ensure that high quality work becomes the norm. The school environment has been tidied and improved through the more thoughtful display of pupils’ work. The professional support of the

p.1

The quality of leadership and management at the school

executive headteacher is having a positive impact on developing leadership capacity. Well- considered plans are in place for sharing good practice in teaching, including by Lowerhouse teachers visiting the executive headteacher’s school.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Governors have taken steps to ensure that they have robust and reliable information on which to evaluate the school’s effectiveness. They are receiving training from the local authority to equip them to challenge and support school leaders and teachers. The school’s spending plans have been revised so that pupil-premium funding is used properly to support eligible pupils. Governors now understand the relationship between pupils’ achievement and teachers’ pay and know how to ensure that pay performance is dealt with equitably to raise standards. They are establishing closer individual links with classes to strengthen their insight. The local authority has established a governors’ standards and effectiveness committee, attended by an adviser, through which governors are checking on the detailed progress being made in strengthening leadership, improving teaching and raising standards. Arrangements for the recruitment of a permanent headteacher have been put in place.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The local authority statement of action is fit for purpose.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school's improvement plan is fit for purpose.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school may not appoint newly qualified teachers before the next monitoring inspection.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children's Services for Lancashire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion