Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 13 Jun 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Heather Yaxley

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Heather Yaxley

  • Postcode verified

    NR21 0PL

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+18Mostly positivemore positive than 34% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisegood progressstrengthscleareffectiveaccurateimproving
Criticismweaknessesabsencenot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Full report text

Mrs Mary Dolan Executive headteacher Hindringham Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School Wells Road Hindringham Fakenham Norfolk NR21 0PL

p.1

Education act 2005 to Hindringham Church of England Voluntary

Controlled Primary School, Norfolk local authority.

p.1

Education act 2005 to Hindringham Church of England Voluntary

Following my visit to your school on 17 May 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Education act 2005 to Hindringham Church of England Voluntary

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in February 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I met with you, the head of teaching and learning, the lead teacher, the Chair and Vice-Chair of the Governing Body together with another governor, and the school’s adviser from the local authority. The school action plan was evaluated.

p.1

Context

Significant changes in senior leadership, governance and teaching have taken place. At the time of the inspection in February, an acting headteacher was leading the school and temporary arrangements were in place to cover the long-term absence of two teachers. The two teachers recently returned from absence and a long-serving teacher left the school. In April, as planned, Hindringham and three other small, local primary schools came together in a hard federation known as The Pilgrim Serco Inspections 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01216 799164 Direct email :tim.ogbourn@serco.com Federation. The other schools are Blakeney, Walsingham and Kelling, and all are now church schools. The federation is led by an executive headteacher and a head of teaching and learning, with a lead teacher in each school. There is a new, single

p.1

Main findings

The executive headteacher and the leader of teaching and learning have focused on two things; first, to investigate further the areas identified for improvement at the inspection and, second, to establish a shared way forward with staff. For these reasons, a short-term plan was put in place to evaluate the quality of teaching and pupils’ learning. Although not fit for the purpose of long-term development, the plan is having the desired effects of establishing where the strengths and weaknesses lie, removing any reasons that would hamper rapid improvement and informing future plans and actions.

p.2

Main findings

A thorough review of pupils’ progress revealed that there is not enough information available and that pupils’ achievements are not well tracked over time. As a result, urgent action is taking place to make sure that current assessments of pupils’ work are accurate and provide the information needed to carefully target and track their progress from now on.

p.2

Main findings

Part-time teachers and support staff have been given additional, paid time to plan together to ensure continuity in learning for pupils throughout each week. Teachers’ planning has been highlighted for development, especially in the class where the Early Years Foundation Stage and Key Stage 1 are taught together.

p.2

Main findings

Since their appointments five weeks ago, senior staff have worked with teachers on ways to improve how the curriculum is taught, how pupils are assessed and how well the environment contributes to learning. As a result, there are now more opportunities for pupils to write at length, pupils’ speaking and listening skills have been assessed, and mathematics vocabulary is taught more explicitly. Making sure that pupils in Year 2 and Year 6 are ready for the next stage in their education is also a current focus.

p.2

Main findings

The governing body is very clear about its roles and responsibilities, and the need to focus improvements on pupils’ learning. Suitable arrangements are in place to make sure that the particular needs of this school are given the attention needed within the wider business of the federation. Formal monitoring has not yet taken place.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders and governors have begun to take effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommends that further action is taken to:

p.2

Main findings

 prepare and implement an action plan with clear aims and measurements that will lead to good teaching and good progress for all pupils. Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

Senior leaders are well placed to make good use of external support from a range of sources. The local authority gives an appropriate level of support. The local authority adviser provides challenge to senior staff about the difference that their actions make to pupils’ progress, and to teachers about how their teaching makes a difference to pupils’ learning. In addition to seeking out good practice in other schools within the federation, senior leaders have established a collaborative arrangement with West Raynham and Sculthorpe Teaching School. The teaching school is running a training programme especially for teachers in the federation, with a focus on improving teaching. An external consultant, commissioned by the governing body, also provides support.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Norfolk and the Diocese of Norwich.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion