Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

The Newbridge School

Inspected 22 May 2013 · published 12 Jun 2013 · URN 138301

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

David Martin (lead), Thelma McIntosh-Clark, William Cassell

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    22 May 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    David Martin, Thelma McIntosh-Clark, William Cassell

  • Postcode verified

    LE67 3SJ

  • Name on report verified

    Newbridge High School Academy Trust

  • URN verified

    138301

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+38Positivemore positive than 44% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingstrongpositiveambitiousconsistentlyeffectivehighly effectiveexceptionally
Criticisminadequaterequires improvementnot consistentlynot yetpoorseriousweaknesseslack

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1323w+38
  • Leadership811w+32
  • What needs to improve130w+62

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,188
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 42%Leadership 26%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 29%

Full report text

P R O T E C T – I N S P E C T I O N School report

p.1

Newbridge High School Academy Trust Forest Road, Coalville, LE67 3SJ

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Not previously inspected This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a good school.  Teaching is nearly always good right across the school and across the full range of subjects.  Teachers have strong subject knowledge and make sure that pupils of all abilities and backgrounds make good progress, including the more able.  As a result, the standards reached are above those seen in most schools for pupils of the same age. This is true of most pupils, including disabled pupils or those who have special educational needs.  Standards are particularly high in mathematics.  Pupils have positive attitudes to their learning, work hard in lessons and feel happy, safe and free from bullying.  Behaviour is generally good, both in classrooms and around the site. Pupils have many opportunities to take on roles or responsibility.  The planning and checking of the work of the school by leaders and managers have resulted in good teaching being maintained over time.  Adults who lead the school have made sure

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

that a strong sense of direction has been sustained through a period of significant change.  Governors know the strengths of the school well and where it can be improved. They check on the quality of what the school provides and are ambitious for its further success.

p.1

It is not yet an outstanding school because

 Only a small number of lessons are outstanding.  At times teachers do not use questioning enough to check how well pupils are doing in lessons.  The recently revised teaching and learning policy is not fully in place, so that independent, active learning and helpful marking and assessment are not consistently seen.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 The inspection team observed 24 longer parts of lessons taught by 24 different teachers. They also made many shorter visits to classrooms to look closely at marking in books.  The team watched an assembly, observed tutor periods and visited many different areas of the school and the site during lessons and at break times.  Meetings were held with three different groups of pupils, the Chair of the Governing Body with two governor colleagues, senior staff and subject leaders. The lead inspector conducted a brief telephone conversation with the school improvement adviser.  The inspection team examined a range of school documentation, including school development plans and policies, lesson and departmental plans, records of lesson monitoring and checks on pupils’ work, and the minutes of meetings, including those of the governing body.  Inspectors examined a range of data, both that available to the public and that used by the

p.2

Information about this inspection

school to monitor current rates of pupil progress and attendance.  The 39 responses made to Parent View by the end of the first day of the inspection were considered, along with staff questionnaires. Inspectors also considered a wide range of consultations that the school conducts with pupils, parents and carers and staff.

p.2

Inspection team

David Martin, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Thelma McIntosh-Clark Additional Inspector William Cassell Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 Newbridge is a smaller-than-average secondary school and specialist sports college. It converted to become an academy school in July 2012. When its predecessor school, Newbridge High School, was last inspected by Ofsted, it was judged to be good.  The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for the pupil premium, extra government funding to narrow gaps in achievement by pupils eligible for free school meals, looked-after children and pupils from service families, is broadly average.  The proportion of pupils from minority ethnic groups is lower than in most similar schools, as is the proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language. Most pupils are from White British backgrounds, although a small proportion of pupils from a variety of different ethnic heritages are represented in the school population.  The proportion of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs supported

p.3

Information about this school

through school action is a little below average.  The proportion of pupils supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is broadly average.  The school leadership is in a period of change. It has been led by two co-headteachers for the current academic year, one of whom is the long-standing post holder. A new headteacher has been appointed for September 2013. He was able to join the inspection meeting and the feedback on the final day.  The school, having only Key Stage 3 pupils, is not subject to government floor standards, by which minimum expectations are set for secondary schools.  No pupils regularly attend other schools or centres for part of their education.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Make sure that much of the teaching in the school is outstanding and never less than consistently good at the time of the next inspection by:  increasing opportunities for pupils to spend parts of lessons working more independently of the teacher, in discussing their work together and solving problems for themselves  more consistently engaging pupils actively in their own learning, by employing the wider variety of learning activities outlined in the new teaching and learning policy  ensuring greater consistency in marking and feedback to pupils, so that they always know exactly how to improve their work and have regular opportunities to do so  asking more probing questions and checking learning during lessons in order to adapt teaching more readily to pupils’ different needs and abilities.

p.3

The achievement of pupils is good

 Pupils learn well in the great majority of lessons. They settle to work quickly, are cooperative and positive in their attitudes and work productively. Because of this, lessons proceed at a good pace and pupils develop a broad range of skills and knowledge in subjects across the school. These include literacy, numeracy and communication skills, including information technology.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 More-able pupils often have extension activities provided for them so that they achieve well in lessons and are often set highly challenging tasks and activities, which is reflected in the good progress made at higher levels of attainment.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Improved data and tracking systems mean that early support is provided for disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs, and those who may find learning harder. This helps these pupils to achieve well in lessons and in the smaller steps measured through additional support out of lessons.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Pupils entitled to support provided through the pupil premium and Year 7 catch-up premium also make strong gains as a result of planned activities. The recently revised reading support is effective. As a result, gaps in performance are closing to a point where these pupils are currently less than two terms behind their peers in English and mathematics.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Pupils attain standards in Year 9 final assessments that are above national expectations, although there has been a slight decline. This is partly due to pupils entering the school with significantly lower levels of attainment.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Attainment in English was around expected levels in 2012, although school assessments indicate that this is on course to rise back to above-average levels in 2013. Attainment in science was above average and was high in mathematics.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 The progress that pupils make is good overall and particularly strong in mathematics. No group of pupils achieves less well than their peers as progress is consistent for all groups of pupils, including minority ethnic pupils and those who speak English as an additional language.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Teacher assessments place the school consistently in the top quarter of all schools overall for progress. However, there has been some variation in progress in core subjects due to changes to staffing and subject leadership.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Teachers have good subject knowledge and subjects are taught by specialists. Planning is generally thorough and classroom resources and display are used well to support learning. Relationships are positive and warm, although some lessons are dominated by teacher talk.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Teachers’ planning often provides extension activities for more-able pupils, and in higher-ability sets the level of work is often very high. This means these pupils achieve well and reach the standards of which they are capable.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 The school has focused on developing questioning skills this year. As a result, questioning is usually open in style and directed at individuals to encourage full participation. However, there is sometimes a lack of more probing questioning or providing opportunities for pupils to build on each others’ ideas.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 School leaders, managers and a working group drawn from across the staff have recently revised the teaching and learning policy. This gives good guidance on the type of learning that will more actively engage pupils and encourage them to be more independent learners and to solve problems for themselves. It also gives guidance on assessment and marking. However, this policy is not yet fully in evidence across the school.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Marking is inconsistent. It does not always give pupils precise advice on how they can improve their work or give opportunities for them to do so as a result. In some cases books are not marked regularly, and the presentation of work is occasionally untidy and lacks care.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 In the best lessons, teachers assess learning at different points. This enables them to quickly adapt the learning for individuals or groups, either by providing additional challenge or providing different approaches and methods where pupils are having difficulties in understanding.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 There are some successful instances where pupils are given responsibility for leading parts of lessons, or for solving problems together. Pupils are encouraged to assess each others’ contribution and their own, enabling them to understand their next steps in learning. This was seen in physical education and several arts lessons, but only occasionally in other areas.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Lessons are conducted with mutual respect and cooperation. Movement around the school and conduct in social areas are generally sensible and considerate. The school has a friendly, positive atmosphere where visitors are welcomed.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Attendance is below average, but not markedly so. School staff are concerned by the issue and are particularly aware of the negative impact that a small number of particularly complex individual cases is having on the overall figures. These issues are being rigorously addressed through working closely with families and a range of other agencies.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 There have been no recent permanent exclusions. Although a little above average, fixed-term exclusions are falling as the revised behaviour policy is taking effect and the initial impact of higher expectations is becoming more established.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 The school provides convincing case studies of how support has led to improvements in behaviour and achievement for a number of pupils. All pupils report that they feel well cared for and that there would be an adult to talk to if they had a particular problem.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 In discussions with inspectors, pupils say they know how to keep safe. They understand different types of bullying, including prejudice-based and cyber-bullying. Pupils report that bullying is uncommon and is dealt with quickly and effectively where it does occur.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Most pupils reported some occasional poor behaviour in class, but that it rarely affects their learning. School records reflect these views and indicate that the good behaviour seen during the inspection was typical.  The many ways that are used to check on pupil satisfaction show that they are very happy with life at the school. Pupils particularly noted the many leadership opportunities available, as sports leaders, house captains, school council members or reading mentors for example.

p.5

The leadership and management are good

 School leaders and managers, together with the governing body, have ambition for the continuing success of the school. Their focus is on academic excellence whist developing wider opportunities and experiences for pupils in preparation for adult life.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Good achievement and consistently effective teaching has been sustained during a significant period of change for the school. This is due to concise improvement plans that have a limited number of key priorities, informed by accurate self-evaluation. There is a well-established cycle of observation in place to check the quality of teaching.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Some development-plan actions are not very sharply focused or specific. This leads to some inconsistency in how subject areas and teachers interpret policy, particularly that relating to teaching and learning and marking and assessment.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Challenging targets of being in the top five per cent of schools for progress at Key Stage 3 have been adopted. Along with teaching targets, these are built in to objectives for all teaching staff. Staff have accepted this challenge, and training has been provided to help staff to improve their teaching further.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The curriculum has a strong impact on attainment. It is suitably broad and balanced, and is enhanced by some early GCSE work being trialled in some subjects. Pupils enjoy the challenge of this work, notably in citizenship. There is also a broad range of enrichment activity, notably in sports and the arts but also across a wide range of pupil interests, as seen in the ‘activities week’ programme.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The school provides well for the personal development of pupils. There has been an audit of social, moral, cultural and spiritual aspects of the curriculum. Teachers take many opportunities to link subject work to these themes, and tutor time and citizenship contribute strongly. Pupils have a sense of fairness and right and wrong, exhibit good social skills and develop their wider cultural understanding of life in the modern world.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 School leaders and managers check that the many opportunities that the school provides are available for all pupils. They take speedy action if any student is discriminated against and help pupils to be tolerant and thoughtful.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Although the school is a free-standing academy, a group of local schools share a school improvement partner who provides an external view of the school’s performance and effectiveness. This school partnership is also providing valued support for staff and wider opportunities for pupils in the school and local area.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The governance of the school:  Governors know the strengths of the school and areas for improvement well. They have a thorough working understanding of a range of school data and pupils’ achievement. They bring a strong breadth of expertise and experience to their roles, and are able to challenge school leaders and managers on a wide number of issues.  Governors visit most classrooms every year. They also receive first-hand reports from subject leaders and senior staff. Because they are well informed, they know what the quality of teaching is like across the school. They understand that there is now a need to move more teaching to outstanding, as is shown in the development plan and revised policy documents.  The arrangements for the management of teachers’ performance are well linked to ambitious school priorities. Governors are clear that career progression will be based on meeting these targets. Staff do not progress to higher pay scales if performance does not match

p.6

The leadership and management are good

expectations. They know what the school is doing to tackle any underperformance.  A deficit budget has been brought back into balance. Governors work closely with a highly efficient business manager to ensure that money is used effectively for the benefit of pupils.

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.8

School details

Unique reference number 138301 Local authority Leicestershire Inspection number 409374

p.9

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.9

School details

Type of school Academy converter School category Community Age range of pupils 11–14 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 506 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Jo-Anne Wilson Headteacher Pat Young and Cath Crossley Date of previous school inspection Not previously inspected Telephone number 01530 831561 Fax number 01530 276440 Email address info@newbridgehs.leics.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.10

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.10

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.10

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion