Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Kearsley Academy

Inspected 10 May 2013 · published 10 Jun 2013 · URN 136135

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Paul Chambers (lead), Judith Tolley, Timothy Gartside

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    10 May 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Judith Tolley, Paul Chambers, Timothy Gartside

  • Leadership and management AI-checked

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    BL4 8HY

  • Name on report verified

    Kearsley Academy

  • URN verified

    136135

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−0Mixedmore positive than 25% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingimprovedconsistentlypositiveexcellenthighly effectiveexceptionallyfeel safe
Criticisminadequaterequires improvementinsufficientweakerbelownot alwaysfailpoor

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings360w+63
  • What needs to improve1736w−10

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,014
shorter than usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 47
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 12%What needs to improve 60%About the inspection 28%

Full report text

Kearsley Academy Springfield Road, Kearsley, Bolton, Lancashire, BL4 8HY

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Not previously inspected This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Requires improvement 3

p.1

This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because

 There is no established pattern of students making progress from their starting points that compares favourably with the national averages.  The quality of students’ writing is below the standard of their other work and is not always corrected sufficiently.  The quality of teaching is not consistently good or better and some inadequate teaching remains.  While there is evidence of recent improvements, the actions of leaders and managers, including governors, have not had sufficient impact to ensure that students achieve consistently well.  The sixth form requires improvement.

p.1

The school has the following strengths

 The academy has a growing reputation among the local community.  Senior leaders have established a good system for improving the quality of teaching, which is beginning to have an impact. As a result, current students are making better progress than students who took GCSEs in previous years.  Students feel safe; they behave well around the academy and believe that working in the new building has led to improved behaviour.  Leaders and managers have successfully improved students’ attendance.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 During this inspection, inspectors observed 25 lessons, including six that were observed jointly with senior staff at the academy. They also made shorter visits to several other lessons.  Inspectors held meetings with the Principal, staff and students, as well as the school’s Achievement Partner and the headteacher of a local primary school. The lead inspector had a telephone conversation with the Chair of the Governing Body and the Chief Executive of the academy’s main sponsors, Northern Education.  Inspectors scrutinised a range of documentation, including that relating to the work of the governing body and the achievement, behaviour and safety of students. They took account of the school’s surveys of parental views as well as responses to the staff questionnaire. They were unable to take account of the online questionnaire Parent View, because too few responses were registered.

p.2

Inspection team

Paul Chambers, Lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Timothy Gartside Additional Inspector Judith Tolley Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 Kearsley Academy is small compared with most secondary schools.  The academy is sponsored by Northern Education and Bolton Council; it has partnership arrangements with Bolton University.  The academy opened in September 2010 and expanded to include a sixth form in September 2011. It moved into new purpose-built accommodation in April 2013.  The proportion of students known to be eligible for the pupil premium (additional funding for students who are known to be eligible for free school meals, those who are looked after by the local authority and those from services families) is high compared with the national average.  The proportion of students supported through school action is below average.  The proportion of students supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is above average.  Over 90% students are White British; remaining students come from a range of different ethnic

p.3

Information about this school

backgrounds.  In all year groups, the proportion of students who speak English as an additional language has increased recently.  A very small number of students attend off-site provision part-time, following vocational courses run by Rathbone or the Prince’s Trust.  In 2012, the academy did not meet the government’s current floor standards for students’ attainment and progress.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the quality of teaching by  ensuring that teachers take more account of different ability levels in the class when planning and teaching lessons  pursuing further current initiatives to share good practice so that more teaching is of a consistently good quality.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Raise achievement so that the proportion of students making the expected progress in English and mathematics at least matches national averages.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the quality of students’ writing by giving more opportunities for extended writing and ensuring that teachers correct students’ written work more rigorously.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve outcomes in the sixth form by ensuring that students are on courses appropriate to their ability levels.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve leadership and management by:  ensuring that the evaluation of students’ achievement takes sufficient account of all recent examination results  ensuring that the monitoring of teaching takes full account of students’ progress over time.

p.3

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 Students enter Year 7 with attainment that is below that expected for their age. Attainment at GCSE overall is below average. Measures of progress show that students who left the school recently made less progress than similar students in other schools. In both 2011 and 2012, the proportion of students making the expected progress in English was below average; similarly, the proportion making the expected progress in mathematics was below average.  Data provided by the school, supported by the early-entry GCSE results of current Year 11 students and other inspection evidence, show that current students are making better progress than those from recent years. The evidence points clearly to higher results in GCSE English and mathematics than those achieved by recent students.  The quality of students’ writing is lower than other aspects of their work.  The achievement of all groups, including disabled students and those with special educational

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

needs, requires improvement. Students who speak English as an additional language, many of whom are relatively new to the school, are well supported and quickly acquire the skills they need to take a full part in lessons.  In 2012, students known to be eligible for the pupil premium attained GCSE qualifications in English and mathematics that were approximately one grade below those of other students.  Only small numbers of sixth-form students entered for qualifications before the end of the sixth form’s first year of operation. However, the proportion of successful entries was lower than the national average. More recent evidence shows that, while some current students are making good progress, others are having difficulty coping with the demands of their courses.

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 The quality of teaching observed during the inspection ranged from outstanding to inadequate. While the majority was good or better, a substantial proportion was not. Inspection evidence and students’ progress over time indicate that the school’s view, evaluating teaching as good, is over-positive.  Teachers show good subject knowledge. They use information and communication technology well to display key ideas in an interesting and attractive way. They develop positive relationships with students; as a result, lessons take place in a calm atmosphere and students respond well to the tasks set.  In several lessons seen, students learnt effectively by reflecting on the quality of their work or that of other students. For example, in an excellent dance lesson, the teacher drew students’ attention repeatedly to the criteria used to assess their performance. As a result, at the end of the lesson, students were able to explain clearly what they had learnt.

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 Where the learning is less effective, teachers take insufficient account of the range of abilities in the class, so that the work is too difficult for some and too easy for others. While the quality of questioning was good in several lessons, in others, the teacher gave students insufficient thinking time or missed chances for students to give an extended answer.  Teachers have responded positively to the school’s drive to improve students’ language, communication and mathematical skills. However, they do not always give sufficient attention to developing students’ writing skills, for example, they give too few opportunities for extended writing or they fail to correct poor spelling or grammar.  In the sixth form lessons observed during the inspection, teaching was consistently good.

p.4

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Students behave well around the school and most lessons take place in a calm working atmosphere. Staff and students believe that the move to the new buildings has had a positive impact on students’ behaviour. Sixth-form students work well outside lessons in the study areas allocated to them.  The academy’s pastoral system and mentoring of individual students who display challenging behaviour have helped to reduce both the number of exclusions and the number of referrals to senior staff.  Students feel safe in the academy. They know that there is always someone on the staff to whom they can turn. They are aware of different types of bullying, including cyber-bullying, and know how to keep themselves safe when using the internet. They report that, although there is some name calling, bullying is rare and dealt with swiftly.  Attendance has improved and is now in line with the national average. The proportion of

p.4

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

students who are persistently absent has reduced. Students move calmly and sensibly around the academy and most are ready to start lessons on time. Managers are aware that a small number of students need help to improve their punctuality to lessons.  The small number of students who attend off-site provision appreciate the opportunity to learn in a less formal setting and to develop work-related skills. Managers ensure that the students are safe and monitor their attendance and progress closely.

p.5

The leadership and management requires improvement

 While the school evaluates leadership and management as outstanding, inspectors judge it to require improvement because leaders have yet to secure a track record of good achievement for students or a trend of improving examination results. Self-evaluation takes insufficient account of the full set of recent examination results, such as the inadequate achievement of students who took GCSEs in 2012.  Leaders, including the Principal, have high ambitions for future developments. They articulate a clear philosophy for raising aspirations and improving outcomes for young people in the area. Evidence for this can be found in the decision to set up the sixth form and maintain it even when, initially, numbers were low. Numbers in the sixth form grew considerably this year.  Leaders and managers form a unified team and enjoy the support of other staff, for example, all who responded to the staff questionnaire said they are proud to work at Kearsley Academy. The

p.5

The leadership and management requires improvement

academy enjoys a growing reputation in the area, and has established effective partnerships with local primary schools.  The academy enters students early for their GCSE English and mathematics. Relatively few students gain the highest A* and A grades. Inspection evidence suggests that more students have gained the highest grades this year but also that some students lose motivation to improve their grade after gaining a grade C at their first attempt.  The curriculum meets the needs of students. In Year 7, a cross-curricular approach to teaching English and humanities subjects helps students to settle into the academy quickly and to develop strong relationships with their form teacher. The academy has set up timetabled sessions that focus on helping weaker readers to catch up with age-related expectations. In Key Stage 4, leaders have ensured that curricular options enable students to gain a grounding in the most

p.5

The leadership and management requires improvement

popular sixth-form subjects.  A programme of after-school enrichment activities helps to promote students’ social and teamwork skills. Groups of students have achieved notable success at a national level, gaining prestigious awards in cheerleading and street-dance.  The pupil premium funding has been spent on a range of provision, including one-to-one tuition in mathematics, mentoring, literacy support and motivational trips. The impact of this additional provision is mixed: in English and mathematics, the gap between the attainment of students eligible for the pupil premium and that of other students widened in 2012 compared with the previous year, but data supplied by the school show some narrowing of gaps for current students. Year 7 catch-up funding has been used for educational visits and to support the teaching of reading but it is too soon to assess its impact.  The school’s surveys show positive parental views of the school. For example, parents feel well

p.5

The leadership and management requires improvement

informed about the progress their children are making.  The academy has capacity to improve. Leaders and managers have raised attendance and improved behaviour. The quality of teaching is beginning to improve, as a result of sharing good practice and focused staff development and is leading to better progress for current students. However, attainment dropped last year (albeit with a weaker group of students). Leaders accept that examination predictions last year were over-optimistic and now have a more rigorous system in place for monitoring students’ progress.  The academy’s sponsors provide helpful support in a number of ways. For example, Northern Education provides funding for the school’s Achievement Partner, who is able to give additional support to the school’s leaders. The support from Bolton Council facilitates links between the academy and other local schools, and enables staff from different schools to share expertise.

p.6

The leadership and management requires improvement

The partnership with Bolton University helps to raise the aspirations of sixth-form students.  The academy meets all safeguarding requirements.  The governance of the school:  Governors hold the academy’s leaders to account. For example, they challenged the academy’s leaders to explain why the 2012 results did not meet predictions and are now confident that the system used to monitor students’ progress is more reliable. They are aware of where teaching is stronger and where it is weaker through not only discussions with the Principal, but also regular visits to classrooms. They ensure that pay rises are awarded only when merited by teachers’ performance.  Governors ensure that financial management is sound and monitor the use of pupil premium funding. They are aware that the school’s website does not currently include enough information on issues such as the academy’s curriculum or the pupil premium and its impact.

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.7

School details

Unique reference number 136135 Local authority Bolton Inspection number 399788

p.8

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.8

School details

Type of school Academy sponsor-led School category Non-maintained Age range of pupils 11–19 Gender of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils in the sixth form Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 440 Of which, number on roll in sixth form 62 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Ray Steele Principal Nigel Jepson Date of previous school inspection Not previously inspected Telephone number 01204 332 555 Fax number 01204 332 555 Email address admin@kearsleyacademy.org guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.9

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.9

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion