Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Ashgate Primary School

Inspected 16 May 2013 · published 10 Jun 2013 · URN 131685

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    16 May 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Christopher Parker, Lesley Sanderson, Mary Le Breuilly

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    DE22 3FS

  • Name on report verified

    Ashgate Primary School

  • URN verified

    131685

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2007.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+17Mostly positivemore positive than 4% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingeffectivestrengthsimprovedenjoyimprovinggood progresshighly effective
Criticismweaknessesnot alwaysinadequateweaknessnot outstandingrequires improvementunacceptablenot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1257w+12
  • Leadership732w+15
  • What needs to improve59w+64

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
1,965
shorter than usual (typical 2966)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 44%Leadership 26%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 28%

Full report text

Ashgate Primary School Ashbourne Road, Derby, DE22 3FS

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a good school.  Progress in English and mathematics has improved strongly and is now good.  Senior leaders and governors have ensured that teaching has improved. Teachers now use a wider range of approaches to help children learn.  Pupils enjoy lessons and listen carefully to teachers. They are keen to do well.  Pupils are encouraged to think about their work and to discuss it with their peers. This helps them understand their work better.  There are good relationships between pupils and adults in school. Pupils feel safe and say that they have somebody to turn to in times of trouble.  Pupils behave well in lessons and around the school. Lessons are rarely disrupted by poor behaviour.  The headteacher, along with her senior team, know the strengths and weaknesses of the school well and have clear plans for further improvements.

p.1

It is not yet an outstanding school because

 Progress in English and mathematics has improved but is not yet outstanding.  There is not enough outstanding teaching.  Though some marking is very helpful to pupils, other marking does not tell them how to improve. Incorrect spelling, punctuation and grammar are not always corrected.  Teaching in subjects other than English and mathematics is sometimes too superficial and lacks challenge.  Curriculum leaders do not monitor and evaluate pupils’ progress clearly which means they cannot plan effectively for improvement.  Attendance, though improving, is still too low.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 The inspectors visited 20 lessons or parts of lessons and looked at work in pupils’ books, including four lessons observed jointly with the headteacher and deputy headteacher. They listened to pupils read, visited an assembly and observed playtime and lunchtime activities.  Meetings were held with the headteacher, members of the governing body, a local authority representative, key staff, lunchtime supervisors and pupils.  Documents looked at included the school’s self-evaluation summary, governors’ minutes, information on pupils’ progress and documents relating to safeguarding, school management and the curriculum.  Parents’ and carers’ views were taken into account through the 35 responses to the Ofsted online survey (Parent View), meeting parents and carers on the playground and the school’s most recent survey of parents’ and carers’ views. The inspection team considered 34 staff questionnaires.

p.2

Inspection team

Mary Le Breuilly, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Christopher Parker Additional Inspector Lesley Sanderson Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 Ashgate Primary School is larger than the average sized primary school.  The proportion of pupils from ethnic minority backgrounds is above average and the proportion of those who speak English as an additional language is average.  The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for pupil premium funding (additional funding provided by the government to support pupils known to be eligible for free school meals, children in local authority care and those from service families) is about twice the national average. There are two children in local authority care and no children from service families in the school. Numbers of children in care are too small to comment meaningfully on their progress in this report.  The proportion of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs who are supported through school action is average. The proportion supported at school action plus or through a statement of special educational needs is above average.

p.3

Information about this school

 The numbers of pupils joining and leaving the school outside normal times is above average.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for attainment and progress.  Some pupils in Key Stage 1 and all pupils in Key Stage 2 are taught in mixed age classes.  A new headteacher has been appointed since the previous inspection.  A major building programme has been under way during this academic year and will finish in the Autumn term 2013.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Move progress and quality of teaching from good to outstanding by:  Improving the rigour and depth with which subjects other than English and mathematics are taught  ensuring greater consistency in marking.  Strengthening the monitoring and evaluation by curriculum leaders so that they plan for improvements more effectively.  Ensuring that pupils’ attendance continues to improve.

p.3

The achievement of pupils is good

 Pupils start school in Reception with skills that are, on average, lower than those expected for their age. By the time they leave school at the end of Year 6 they have caught up in both English and mathematics and they leave with average standards.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 The progress of children in Reception has improved this year and they are making good progress. By the time they enter Year 1 they are closer to the standards expected for their age.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 The progress of pupils in Key Stage 2 is good in both English and mathematics, though progress in English is a little stronger than in mathematics. This represents a big improvement during the past two years.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Last year’s phonics (linking letters and sounds) screening check showed that by the end of Year 1 pupils’ reading was below average. However, they learn to read quickly and by the end of Year 2 they have caught up. Attainment in reading has risen over the past two years. The systematic teaching of phonics (letters and sounds) helps most pupils to learn to read quickly and accurately. Pupils told inspectors that they enjoy reading.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 School information shows that pupils who attend regularly make much better progress than those who are frequently absent.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Pupils eligible for additional support from pupil premium funding make similar progress to their peers because of the additional attention they receive. They leave school about one and a half terms behind other pupils in English and nearly two terms behind in mathematics. This is a narrower gap than that seen in the average primary school.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds reach similar standards to their White British classmates. Those who speak English as an additional language receive good support and their progress accelerates as soon as they are able to speak and write English well.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs make good progress in both English and mathematics. This is because the school provides effective support and intervention to help them succeed.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 The school’s progress information shows that pupils’ progress has now accelerated, particularly in year 6, as a result of careful intervention and support. Work in books and the school’s information confirms that these pupils are on track to make nationally expected levels of progress by the summer and that many will exceed them. A new system of monitoring progress in detail is being used to help teachers understand the gaps in the knowledge of the pupils and they are able to take actions to address these areas of weakness.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Teaching is good. Work in pupils’ books show that they are making good progress.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 The recently introduced system for looking at the strengths and weaknesses of each individual child in English and mathematics is helping teachers plug gaps in pupils’ knowledge and skills. Pupils are very aware of what they need to do to improve because teachers talk to them about this regularly.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 The school’s records show that teaching is improving. The headteacher has made the improvement of teaching and learning a high priority for the school, and teachers and teaching assistants have risen to the challenges she has given them. As a result pupils’ progress is improving quickly.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Teachers in Reception are effective in planning activities and choices that allow children to explore and improve their knowledge and skills. Children learn both indoors and outside and have opportunities to develop their communication skills and physical dexterity and to use their imagination.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Pupils engage well with learning. They look up to their teachers and are keen to please them. They work well in groups and on their own, for example using word lists independently and helping each other when they get stuck.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 The teaching of phonics is well-structured and effective. Pupils are developing a love of reading though they do not all read widely yet.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Some marking, particularly in English, helps children understand what they need to do to improve. In other books, however, marking is much less detailed and does not clearly identify where pupils are going wrong. Spelling, punctuation and grammar are not always corrected.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 In lessons other than English and mathematics, teachers have been developing a new approach to subjects based on themes. While pupils enjoy these lessons they are too often lacking in rigour and do not provide enough depth or challenge. This is because teachers are not thinking carefully enough about how to help pupils make progress in these subjects.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Pupils develop good communication skills through discussion and note-taking and they are able to research topics independently.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Although most of the teaching is good there is little outstanding teaching evident.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils generally behave well in lessons and around school. They are friendly and welcoming to visitors and work and play well together.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Lessons are rarely disrupted by misbehaviour. Teachers manage behaviour well and teaching assistants make a strong contribution to both the good behaviour and the progress of pupils.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils say they feel safe in school. They are able to talk about their understanding of the different forms of bullying and they know the difference between bullying and other forms of misbehaviour. They reported that bullying and any incidents of unacceptable behaviour are infrequent and are dealt with effectively when they occur.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Attendance is improving but it remains below average.  Concerns about levels of supervision and health and safety issues at lunch time were raised by lunchtime supervisors. Inspectors investigated these issues and judged that the number of adults on duty during lunch times is adequate to ensure the safety of pupils and to support good behaviour.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 The school pays very good attention to equality of opportunity by keeping a close eye on the progress and well-being of every child, whatever their circumstances. Discrimination of any kind is not tolerated.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The headteacher and the governors have a very clear view of the strengths and weaknesses of the school. The headteacher is ambitious for the school and leads with clarity and purpose.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Careful monitoring by senior leaders has helped them to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the school. The headteacher, her senior team, and the governors, have a realistic view of the school, based on evidence. Because of this they are able to plan for improvements in an accurate and effective way.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Teachers are appraised for their performance against targets which include how much progress pupils make and the standards they reach. Training for staff is linked to their individual needs and to the school’s priorities.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The systems the school has put in place to support its smooth running and to identify and tackle areas of weakness are robust and effective and as a result the school runs efficiently and demonstrates the capacity to improve further.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The majority of parents are very happy with the school. They feel that teachers are approachable and that their children are making progress. Several parents said they felt the school had improved since the last inspection.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The school curriculum is undergoing change at present and the school has bought a commercial scheme that links some subjects together into topics in an attempt to help make learning more coherent and more relevant to the pupils. A range of visits, visitors and special activities in school help to bring learning to life. Whilst the school meets the legal requirements that set out what a school should be teaching, some work is needed to ensure the curriculum is sufficiently rigorous.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Some curriculum leaders do not monitor their areas of responsibility closely enough to have a clear view of strengths and weaknesses and they rely too heavily on senior leaders for direction. As a result their planning for improvement is not specific enough.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The local authority has provided some effective support for this improving school. It recognises the improvements that have been made recently and consequently is gradually withdrawing this support as the school’s leadership capacity strengthens.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The governance of the school:  Nearly all members of the governing body have been in post for less than two years. They are very supportive of the school and are increasingly challenging as they develop understanding and expertise in their roles. In general, they know the school well and are aware of its strengths and weaknesses. Their understanding of data is developing strongly.  Governors’ lack of experience means that they are not always fully aware of the level of monitoring and challenge that is needed. For example, although governors know how the pupil premium is spent they are not fully aware of its impact on the progress of vulnerable children.  There has been a significant restructuring of the way the governors carry out their business, and as a result they are playing a more strategic role in school.  Governors know about the quality of teaching in the school. They have a clear understanding

p.6

The leadership and management are good

of the link between pay and performance and have ensured that an appropriate appraisal process is in place.

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.8

School details

Unique reference number 131685 Local authority Derby Inspection number 402496

p.9

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.9

School details

Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 293 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Eryl Prentice Headteacher Ceri Hammond Date of previous school inspection 8 July 2010 Telephone number 01332 343928 Fax number 01332 343869 Email address admin@ashgate.derby.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.10

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.10

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.10

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion