Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 10 Jun 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Frances Millett (lead), Michelle Parker

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Frances Millett, Michelle Parker

  • Postcode verified

    DY6 7EA

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+55Positivemore positive than 54% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedimprovingmake good progresseffectivelyrigorousconfidentstrongconsistently
Criticismnot alwaysmissedlackdisruptionlimitedvariablenot effectivelower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1486w+47
  • Leadership289w+79

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
1,772
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 81%Leadership 16%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Mrs Nikki Miller Headteacher Blanford Mere Primary School Mimosa Walk Kingswinford DY6 7EA

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Blanford Mere Primary School

Following my visit with Frances Millett, Additional Inspector, to your school on 15–16 May 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings.

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Blanford Mere Primary School

The inspection was the fourth monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures following the inspection which took place in February 2012. The full list of the areas for improvement which were identified during that inspection is set out in the annex to this letter. The monitoring inspection report is attached and the main judgements are set out below.

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Blanford Mere Primary School

Progress since being subject to special measures – good.

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Blanford Mere Primary School

Progress since previous monitoring inspection – good.

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Blanford Mere Primary School

Newly qualified teachers may not be appointed.

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Blanford Mere Primary School

This letter and monitoring inspection report will be posted on the Ofsted website. I am copying this letter and the monitoring inspection report to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Dudley.

p.1

Her Majesty’s Inspector

. Serco Inspections 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 6799158 Direct email : rachel.dayan@serco.com

p.1

place in February 2012

 Ensure that the more-able pupils in Key Stage 1 and all pupils in Key Stage 2 make good progress, particularly in mathematics in the latter stage, by improving the quality of teaching so that:  teachers use assessment information more rigorously and, as a consequence, work set meets pupils’ needs and they are guided carefully through small learning steps  during lessons, teachers check regularly on pupils’ learning, address any misconceptions, and ensure that pupils understand how to improve their work  the pace of learning in lessons is improved and teachers do not talk for too long  teachers’ marking consistently provides pupils with clear and focused points for improvement  pupils are provided with more opportunities to practise and apply their academic skills, especially in numeracy, across the curriculum.

p.2

place in February 2012

 Strengthen the capacity for sustained improvement by ensuring that:  leaders rigorously check how effectively pupils at all levels of attainment are challenged in lessons  all plans for improvement are focused sharply on improving pupils’ achievement, have measurable outcomes and the effectiveness of the plans is monitored regularly  the governing body plays a more active role in monitoring and evaluating pupils’ achievement.

p.2

Evidence

During this inspection, we held meetings with the headteacher, the senior leadership team, the Chair and three members of the Governing Body, and a representative of the local authority. We observed the school’s work, scrutinised documents and met two parents. We observed a number of lesson observations jointly with the headteacher. Opportunities to observe Key Stage 2 lessons were limited because pupils were involved in the Year 6 national tests and optional tests.

p.3

Context

Since the previous monitoring visit, one teacher and one teaching assistant have left the school.

p.3

Achievement of pupils at the school

Across the school, pupils’ attainment in reading, writing and mathematics continues to improve. Teachers’ assessments and their understanding of levelling pupils’ work have improved because of more rigorous monitoring by the senior leadership team and moderation with teachers in local schools. This has been validated by the local authority. As a result, the school’s predictions for pupils’ attainment are more accurate. The school expects an improvement in the proportion of pupils gaining Level 4+ in English and mathematics and in the proportion gaining Level 5 at the end of Key Stage 2 in the summer 2013 national tests. The school’s information indicates that the progress of more-able pupils has improved. The progress of other groups of pupils, including those eligible for the pupil premium and disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs has also improved. More pupils are now making the progress they should and some groups are doing better than this.

p.3

Achievement of pupils at the school

As a result, the attainment gap between groups is narrowing.

p.3

Achievement of pupils at the school

In the Early Years Foundation Stage, the teaching of reading, writing and numeracy continues to prepare pupils well for Key Stage 1. Literacy skills are well developed and children’s use and application of mathematical knowledge is improving. Numeracy activities are well integrated into all aspects of learning. Children are encouraged to initiate numeracy activities; for example, in the ‘funfair’. Children paid their entrance fee and bought and sold ice-creams using play money. They confidently counted out change, in ones and twos, and some could recognise the different values of coins. They helped each other give the correct change.

p.3

Achievement of pupils at the school

Improvements in pupils’ progress in writing and numeracy are evident in Key Stage 1. Work in pupils’ books shows that there are more opportunities for pupils to write at length in all subjects. Work on number is better sequenced and develops pupils’ knowledge and skills well across several lessons.

p.3

Achievement of pupils at the school

During the inspection, Year 1 pupils wrote simple sentences and discussed how to develop their writing and use their sentences in the next day’s extended writing. Higher attaining pupils discussed how their different sentences could describe the habitat of mini beasts. Pupils identified correctly a range of connectives and discussed whether they could change their position in the sentence. Pupils understand the sequence of learning better and how their work will be used in the following lesson. As a result, they are encouraged to apply their skills and to build them up steadily and securely.

p.4

Achievement of pupils at the school

In Year 2, pupils are more confident in using their numeracy skills. This is because they work together to solve problems. In a mathematics lesson, pupils gave each other directions using the terms ‘clockwise’ and ‘counter clockwise’ and some pupils were able to use the points of the compass.

p.4

Achievement of pupils at the school

Improvements in writing and mathematics in Key Stage 2 owe much to the improved teaching and improved accuracy in the identification of pupils’ starting points. There are more opportunities for pupils to apply their skills to real-life situations, and this makes learning more interesting and memorable. In Year 6, gifted and talented pupils have benefited from additional support. This enrichment has enabled these pupils to develop challenges for all Year 6 pupils. This, in turn, has increased the enjoyment and confidence of all Year 6 pupils in tackling mathematical problems. The school is appropriately providing imaginative mathematical challenges for all pupils and families to work on for homework. Pupils are very positive about these activities.

p.4

The quality of teaching

Teaching continues to improve but is still too variable. Teaching is more consistent in the Early Years Foundation Stage, Key Stage 1, and Years 5 and 6. Opportunities for numeracy work across the curriculum are better planned, although teachers are not always clear how the numeracy activity supports the learning in the subject. Consequently, some activities lead to confusion and missed opportunities to reinforce pupils’ mathematical skills.

p.4

The quality of teaching

Teachers enthusiastically implement training but do not always consider the full range of skills that could be improved. For example, training to develop pupils’ thinking led to a focus on developing literacy skills in Year 6 science lessons but opportunities were missed for pupils to apply their numeracy and scientific skills. Teachers have made good use of the recent training on using questioning to re- shape learning. This has improved the pace of learning and pupils’ engagement. Better use is made of the school’s ‘stepping stones’ booklets to plan activities which extend learning. In many lessons, all pupils can choose to tackle a more challenging activity that builds their capacity to persevere. Pupils’ write perceptive comments in each other’s books and make useful suggestions as to how their classmates’ work could be improved. Teacher’s marking is improving and is having a greater impact on pupils’ learning. Teachers clearly identify pupils’ misconceptions and, increasingly,

p.4

The quality of teaching

pupils write a thoughtful comment in response about what they have learnt. Pupils are able to improve their work because time is provided for them to do so in the following lesson.

p.5

The quality of teaching

Teaching assistants are better deployed because teachers share their lesson plans with them; teaching assistants know how and when to step in to help pupils. During this inspection, teaching assistants reframed tasks to explain them more clearly to pupils, and their skilful questioning enabled pupils to see their own way through problems. Teaching assistants used their initiative to identify pupils in the class who needed support. They were less effective when they worked with small groups and they were unable to engage inattentive pupils. In such instances, the lack of interest of a minority of pupils slowed the learning of the whole group. The progress of some lower attaining pupils is slowed because they are spending too long with teaching assistants instead of working with the teacher.

p.5

The quality of teaching

Progress since the last monitoring inspection on the areas for improvement:

p.5

The quality of teaching

 ensure that the more-able pupils in Key Stage 1 and all pupils in Key Stage 2 make good progress, particularly in mathematics in the latter stage, by improving the quality of teaching – good.

p.5

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Behaviour around school and in lessons continues to be good overall. Teachers skilfully manage the rare occurrences of low-level disruption. Parents and carers report that they had no concerns about their children’s behaviour and safety. Pupils’ attendance is in line with national averages. The school has worked effectively, in partnership with the local authority, to improve the attendance of a small group of pupils.

p.5

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

The headteacher and senior leadership team continue to provide strong direction, driving improvements across the school. Their sharp focus on improving teaching and increasing pupils’ progress is paying dividends in raising standards in reading, writing and mathematics.

p.5

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

The quality of teaching is improving because the headteacher and senior staff are monitoring the work of the school more effectively. The monitoring of teaching is linked more closely to how well pupils are progressing. The stronger focus on pupils’ progress is reflected in sharper performance management targets for teachers. Teachers have engaged well with training on assessment and applying National Curriculum levels to pupils’ work; assessment is more secure.

p.5

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

Leaders have correctly identified that the improvements in teaching in English and mathematics need to be replicated across the wider curriculum and plans are in hand to address this.

p.6

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

The governing body is more effective; it is monitoring and evaluating pupils’ progress more. As a result of its links with the governing body of a local school, it has identified the need to reorganise its committee structure to ensure that it can challenge the headteacher and senior staff more rigorously. Link governors are increasingly confident about challenging school leaders and managers. However, governors miss opportunities to look at learning first hand because guidance for them on how to do this appropriately has not been provided.

p.6

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

Progress since the last monitoring inspection on the areas for improvement:

p.6

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

 strengthen the capacity for sustained improvement – good.

p.6

External support

The school benefits from the rigorous challenge provided by the local authority and the support it provides through its School Improvement Partner and arrangements with local partner schools. The school is in a stronger position and is able to correctly identify and share its own good practice.

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion