Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Anthony O'Malley
- Postcode verified
LU4 8LD
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Parents who attended a meeting shortly after she took up post describe her as ‘inspirational’. p.2
- An exciting curriculum is inspiring children in Reception to make rapid progress using their early writing skills. p.2
- It has strong features, such challenging targets for improving teaching each term. p.2
- formalise partnerships with outstanding leaders and teachers that will help improve leadership and teaching throughout the school p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Education Act 2005 to Maidenhall Primary School, Luton local authority. p.1
- Following my visit to your school on 17 May 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. p.1
- Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection. p.1
- The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection on 6–7 March 2013. p.1
- It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. p.1
- During the visit, meetings were held with the headteacher, other senior leaders, three members of the governing body, the school improvement adviser and a small group of parents. p.1
- The school improvement plan was evaluated. p.1
- Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI) visited some classrooms and looked at examples of pupils’ work. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 746
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Yasmine Dhillon Maidenhall Primary School Newark Road Luton LU4 8LD
p.1
Requires improvement monitoring inspection visit under section 8 of the
Education Act 2005 to Maidenhall Primary School, Luton local authority.
p.1
Requires improvement monitoring inspection visit under section 8 of the
Following my visit to your school on 17 May 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Requires improvement monitoring inspection visit under section 8 of the
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection on 6–7 March 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with the headteacher, other senior leaders, three members of the governing body, the school improvement adviser and a small group of parents. The school improvement plan was evaluated. Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI) visited some classrooms and looked at examples of pupils’ work.
p.1
Context
The headteacher took up her post in April 2013. There has been a restructuring of senior leadership roles and the number of assistant headteachers reduced from three to two. The governing body has appointed seven new teachers who will join the school in September. Serco Inspections 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0121 679 9160 Direct email :antony.grace@serco.com
p.1
Main findings
Pupils, staff and parents have all welcomed the appointment of the new headteacher. Parents who attended a meeting shortly after she took up post describe her as ‘inspirational’.
p.2
Main findings
Simple but effective measures, such as rules for walking along the corridors and daily visits to classrooms by the headteacher, are improving pupils’ behaviour and their attitudes to learning. An exciting curriculum is inspiring children in Reception to make rapid progress using their early writing skills. However, senior leaders are not yet having enough impact on tackling weaknesses in teaching identified in the previous inspection. For example, much marking is still not showing pupils how to improve their work and pupils’ work in science and ‘creative curriculum’ books show that pupils do not have good opportunities to apply their literacy and numeracy skills. This is preventing pupils making better progress in English and mathematics.
p.2
Main findings
The revised action plan includes all of the areas for improvement identified at the last inspection. It has strong features, such challenging targets for improving teaching each term. There are also timetables of actions which act as helpful reminders to all staff of their role in improving the school. However, the plan provides little detail about how expertise from outside the school will help it on its journey of improvement. The plan does not identify how governors will monitor and hold the senior leaders to account for improvement. In this way it fails to show how governors are driving the necessary improvements.
p.2
Main findings
The headteacher has begun conducting lesson observations and has given the leaders of English and mathematics opportunities to evaluate and support the work of other teachers. Nevertheless, feedback to teachers following lesson observations and reviews of pupils’ work do not focus sufficiently on how well pupils are learning or identify clearly how teaching can improve.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders and governors are not taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the last section 5 inspection. The school should take immediate action to:
p.2
Main findings
formalise partnerships with outstanding leaders and teachers that will help improve leadership and teaching throughout the school improve the quality of marking and its impact on pupils’ progress record clearly how well pupils are learning new skills and knowledge when observing lessons identify how teaching can be improved when writing reports following work scrutiny show in the revised improvement plan how the governing body will monitor and gather evidence of the progress the school is making.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The school purchases support from local authority staff. The school improvement adviser is working with the school’s leaders directly and consultants are providing support. It is too early to see the impact of this support. The headteacher also attends meetings of the Central Area Partnership. There is not yet a formalised agreement about how the partnership can support the school and help it to become good.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Luton local authority.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion