Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 6 Jun 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Heather Yaxley

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Heather Yaxley

  • Postcode verified

    WD23 3AT

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−7Mixedmore positive than 21% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseambitiousclearimprovingswiftlysecureclearlyindependent
Criticismnot yetnot metconcernsnot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings242w+13
  • Leadership752w−9

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
994
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 24%Leadership 74%About the inspection 2%

Full report text

Mr Keith Douglas Executive headteacher Falconer School Falconer Road Bushey Hertfordshire WD23 3AT

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Falconer School

Following my visit to your school on 15 May 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Falconer School

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures following the inspection which took place in February 2013.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, I met with the executive headteacher, the four senior leaders, two members of the governing body and the school effectiveness adviser for secondary schools from the local authority. The local authority’s statement of action, which incorporates the school’s action plan, was evaluated.

p.1

Context

The headteacher and the Chair and Vice-Chair of the Governing Body have left the school. Since April, the headteacher of Bushey Meads School has led Falconer School as the executive headteacher, as well as leading his own school. Bushey Meads School, together with Little Reddings Primary School, form the Bushey St James Trust and the possibility of Falconer School joining the trust may be considered in Serco Inspections 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9161 Direct email : ann.morris@serco.com the future. The governing body plan to appoint a new Chair and Vice-Chair at their next meeting. Two additional governors have been appointed by the local authority.

p.1

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Following the February inspection, the local authority moved swiftly to challenge senior leaders and governors, and then to secure leadership and governance for the foreseeable future. Replacing the governing body with an interim executive board was considered but rejected for the time being. Although they know that the school’s long-term future and leadership need to be decided fairly soon, the executive headteacher, the governing body and the local authority are very clear that this will not detract from the main priority of rapidly improving the quality of teaching and students’ learning.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

At the end of April, the school effectiveness adviser and the executive headteacher held a meeting for parents and carers about the inspection report, the local authority’s response and the changes in leadership. Approximately 50 parents and carers attended the meeting. Parents’ and carers’ views and concerns were recorded, and will be taken into account in the action plans. Further meetings will be held with parents and carers each term.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The local authority’s statement of action sensibly includes the actions that will be taken by advisers, staff, senior leaders and governors. Arrangements for checking that actions take place are clearly set out. Targets are challenging and appropriately linked to students’ academic progress. The part that the governing body plays in checking each part of the plan is not yet clear enough. Similarly, there is not enough mention of how the views of students and their parents and carers on how well things are moving forward will be gathered and considered. The action plan is designed to take the school out of special measures around spring 2014. This is an ambitious aim but measurements and milestones are suitably set to keep everyone on track towards that date. The school action group is about to hold its first meeting to check how well the actions of staff, leaders and governors are starting to make a

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

difference to students’ academic progress and social development.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The senior leadership team has expanded to include leaders for assessment and the Key Stage 4 curriculum. This sensibly provides a bigger team to share the load and responsibility for the most important things that need to improve. The executive headteacher provides clear guidance to senior leaders, who are appreciative of the new opportunities available to them, to take on greater responsibility for school improvement and to learn from the good practice in local secondary schools. They also welcome the considerable amount of support already provided by local authority advisers for English, mathematics, science and assessment. As a result of the actions taken so far, students’ targets have been upgraded to provide appropriate challenge, teachers plan lessons according to an agreed format, a revision of the curriculum is underway and staff performance is managed differently. Actions to address the national minimum standards (NMS) for the boarding accommodation not met at the

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

February inspection include the recent appointment of an independent listener and training planned for next term.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Senior leaders and governors are quite rightly focusing their work on improving students’ progress. They know that the quality of teaching, assessment and the curriculum need to improve to make sure that students have the opportunity to achieve at least as well as their counterparts in good mainstream secondary schools. Although focusing on these things, senior leaders and governors are mindful of the need also to make sure that, when expecting more of students’ learning and attitudes to work, there is no deterioration in students’ social behaviour. The development of staff practice in meeting students’ special educational needs does not have a high enough profile within the senior leadership team to make sure that a good understanding of behaviour and autism influences improvements in teaching and the curriculum.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The governing body have not yet made some important decisions. The election of a new Chair and Vice-Chair has not yet taken place and the way that committees will hold leaders to account for the quality of their work is not yet established. The local authority is to support the governing body in reviewing their roles and responsibilities in the near future.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The local authority statement of action is fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school’s action plan is fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school may not appoint newly qualified teachers before the next monitoring inspection.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Hertfordshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion