Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Alison Storey
- Postcode verified
RG20 7DT
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Following my visit to your school and Shefford Church of England Primary School on 8 May 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. p.1
- Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the federated schools. p.1
- The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the schools were judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspections in January 2013. p.1
- During my visit I met with the chair and three other members of the governing body, had a discussion with your local authority school improvement adviser and looked at plans and records, including the post-Ofsted action plan. p.1
- I appreciate the time you gave to discussions with me and our walk around both schools to visit each classroom. p.1
- Thank you too for making arrangements to release your assistant headteacher and other staff from teaching so that I could meet with them. p.1
- Following a period of considerable turnover of staff prior to the recent inspection there have been no significant changes since, although there will be another change of assistant headteacher in September. p.1
- Two parents have recently joined the governing body. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance8
“Ensure it is clear how and when governors will evaluate impact.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 1,013
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 50, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Remus Sawyerr Headteacher Chaddleworth St Andrew’s Church of England Primary School Chaddleworth Newbury Berkshire RG20 7DT
p.1
school requiring improvement
Following my visit to your school and Shefford Church of England Primary School on 8 May 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the federated schools.
p.1
school requiring improvement
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the schools were judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspections in January 2013.
p.1
Evidence
During my visit I met with the chair and three other members of the governing body, had a discussion with your local authority school improvement adviser and looked at plans and records, including the post-Ofsted action plan. I appreciate the time you gave to discussions with me and our walk around both schools to visit each classroom. Thank you too for making arrangements to release your assistant headteacher and other staff from teaching so that I could meet with them.
p.1
Context
Following a period of considerable turnover of staff prior to the recent inspection there have been no significant changes since, although there will be another change of assistant headteacher in September. Two parents have recently joined the governing body. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5323 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email :suzy.smith@tribalgroup.com
p.1
Main findings
Your action plan, which was initially based on accurate self-evaluation prior to the recent inspection, is clear that what the schools need to do is improve the quality of teaching and the rate at which pupils make progress, particularly in writing and mathematics. Staff and governors I spoke to were in no doubt what the schools’ priorities or overarching targets are because they have either been involved in planning or you have shared it with them in some detail. The plan is not clear enough though about the difference you expect to make to pupils’ learning or the quality of teaching at key points along the way. This makes it difficult to track progress. The governing body’s role in monitoring and evaluation is not explicit enough.
p.2
Main findings
You have updated your original improvement plan to take account of specific points made in the inspection reports. Many of the key activities remain the same and had already started. This puts you, your staff and governors in a good position to tackle what needs to be done. At the core of your work to improve teaching is the way you work alongside staff to plan, teach and review lessons, and you and your assistant headteacher coach individual teachers. There is evidence that this, particularly the coaching, has improved teaching since September and that it is having a knock-on effect on pupils’ progress over time. As you rightly identify in your plan you must not lose momentum in this work. There are some gaps in records which suggest that support may not always have been as focused or frequent since the inspection. Not all staff have had the opportunity to benefit from this kind of support.
p.2
Main findings
The governing body uses your termly data analysis to keep a check on the progress pupils are making across the schools at its Standards Committee. Separately, governors receive an update on the quality of teaching at full governing body meetings, based on the most recent formal classroom observations. This may be several weeks out of date at that point. It does not necessarily give an accurate picture of the quality of teaching over time because it is not linked with pupils’ progress and other evidence such as work in their books.
p.2
Main findings
You have ensured that all recommendations made at the recent inspections are being addressed, even where they were not covered by your original plan. For example, you are monitoring attendance data more rigorously although this is yet to show any real impact. Very recently you gave other staff specific short term projects to develop their leadership roles. The teachers involved are keen and rising to the challenge as best they can, but they have not had sufficient guidance or support to channel their energies effectively. Following the visit to the schools, I recommend that further action is taken to:
p.2
Main findings
review the post-Ofsted action plan to be clearer what you expect the impact to be on pupils’ achievement in writing and mathematics, and how well they can apply their skills at each step along the way. Ensure it is clear how and when governors will evaluate impact. review plans to develop the leadership roles of other staff. What they are asked to do should link closely with existing activities so that they support you and your assistant headteacher rather than creating additional work. Ensure that you are clear how they will be supported in their development.
p.3
Main findings
I will continue to monitor the schools until their next section 5 inspections. I will also follow up opportunities for school staff to attend English and mathematics conferences provided by Ofsted.
p.3
External support
You and your governors benefitted from well-focused advice and support from the local authority in the 18 months prior to the recent inspection. School improvement advisers worked alongside you to confirm that you are making accurate judgements about the quality of teaching in lessons. They supported you in developing pupil progress meetings through which you are challenging staff and identifying what they need to do to help individual pupils. More recently, the local authority has rightly reduced its direct support and is focusing on regular review meetings to hold you and your governors to account for the progress of the schools. The additional support they will provide as part of their new programme for improving schools, and links with good and outstanding local schools, should provide opportunities to learn from good practice elsewhere.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the local authority, the diocese and the chair of the governing body. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion