Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 5 Jun 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Christopher Russell

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Christopher Russell

  • Postcode verified

    RG14 1QY

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+19Mostly positivemore positive than 34% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisehighly effectiveoutstandingcleareffectivekind
Criticismweaknessesnot clearnot clearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Full report text

Jacquie Davies Headteacher Alternative Curriculum Service The Porch Richmond House Bath Road RG14 1QY

p.1

Education act 2005 to Alternative Curriculum Service, West Berkshire

Following my visit to your school on 10 May 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Education act 2005 to Alternative Curriculum Service, West Berkshire

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in February 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit I met with yourself, other senior leaders and members of the management committee (the body responsible for the centre’s governance). I also toured the main site and made very brief visits to a number of lessons. I spoke with a representative of the local authority on the telephone and also evaluated the school’s action plan and other documentation.

p.1

Context

Since the last inspection there have been important changes to the centre’s relationship with the local authority. As is the case with other pupil referral units, on 1 April 2013 the management committee took over responsibility for the budget and for the recruitment and management of staff. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com

p.1

Main findings

The senior leadership team fully and honestly accept and acknowledge the judgements and weaknesses identified in the inspection report. They recognise, in particular, the need to make significant improvements to the way in which staff collect, analyse and use information about students’ achievements. Much has already been done to improve this aspect of the centre’s work. Leaders have visited other pupil referral units and mainstream schools to look at their practice, and have used what they found to develop a new and better system. Staff, for example, now record students’ achievement more carefully when they first join the centre, and they assess their progress much more frequently during the year.

p.2

Main findings

The centre is making good use of its newly delegated financial powers. The previous uncertainty over finances led to many temporary appointments and frequent changes in staff. The centre has now been able to make permanent appointments. This is helping to provide a more stable group of staff for leaders to work with and develop. Much good work is being done to improve teaching. Leaders have, for example, identified a range of features that they expect to see in every lesson. They are visiting lessons to ensure that all teachers are following these new guidelines. Teachers receive clear and detailed written feedback about the quality of their lessons.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders have produced a specific action plan. The new plan is a useful working document, as it identifies important actions and activities, but it has some weaknesses. In particular, the plan is not very clear about:  the intended impact of the different activities, for example the difference they will make to students’ achievement  how much will be achieved by different points in time, for example how much teaching will be good by the end of next term.

p.2

Main findings

The work of the management committee is developing appropriately, in line with the changes that came into force nationally in April 2013. New members have been appointed and there is a better sub-committee structure; this is helping to even out the workload. The local authority has carried out a review of the management committee’s work which members are currently reflecting on. However, members recognise that there is much to do if they are to offer the level of support and challenge that a highly effective school governing body provides. Members’ roles in monitoring the school’s work are too vague and are not identified clearly in the action plan.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders and members of the management committee are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommend that further action is taken to:

p.2

Main findings

 develop the action plan so that it is clear about: - the intended impact of different activities (particularly their impact on teaching and student achievement) - how much should be achieved by different points during the year

p.3

Main findings

 develop the work of the management committee, in particular by ensuring that: - members establish a clearer role in monitoring the centre’s work and reviewing its progress against the action plan

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The local authority is providing an extensive and diverse range of support. You have been proactive in identifying and requesting the kind of support that will be most valuable. You have also made a number of useful links with good and outstanding pupil referral units in the area.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the chair of the management committee, the Director of Children’s Services for West Berkshire and the Education Funding Agency. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion