Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 4 Jun 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Marcia Headon

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Marcia Headon

  • Postcode verified

    PO13 8AA

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+29Mostly positivemore positive than 39% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexcellenteffectivelyoutstandingstrongpositiveimprovingclear
Criticismseriousweaknessesweaker

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings197w0
  • Leadership608w+29

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
805
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 24%Leadership 73%About the inspection 4%

Full report text

Mrs S Thornton Headteacher Siskin Infant and Nursery School Nimrod Drive Rowner Gosport PO13 8AA

p.1

Nursery School

Following my visit to your school on 7 May 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Nursery School

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses in February 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher, two members of the governing body and two representatives of the local authority. The local authority’s statement of action and the school’s action plan were evaluated. The inspector accompanied the headteacher on a walk around the school.

p.1

Context

Since the inspection the school has occupied part of the new buildings which have been erected on the site. There have also been extensive alterations in the Nursery and Reception classes to create an environment which is more suitable for learning. Tribal 1–4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com

p.1

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The executive headteacher took up her position at Siskin Infant and Nursery School in September 2012. She quickly established that significant and rapid actions were needed to improve the quality of teaching and to raise overall standards and progress. At the time of the inspection in February 2013, although the school was judged to have serious weaknesses, the headteacher had already begun to make changes. However, the full effect and impact of these changes were not then evident.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Since the inspection, the headteacher and senior leadership team have continued to give their attention to improving the quality of teaching and ensuring pupils learn effectively. The headteacher has given direction to the work of the school. The action plans, written after the inspection, directly deal with the issues identified in the report. The plans are updated regularly and they have given the school a sense of purpose and confidence that it can succeed. The pace of change has quickened and the impact of the actions taken is now becoming more apparent.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Very clear expectations have been set about the quality of planning and teaching which is required. Extensive support has been provided to all teachers to help them improve, and weaker teachers have been given training and coaching to support their development. The school has wisely drawn on the expertise available from the neighbouring junior school in the federation and from a local teaching school alliance. Revised policies have been introduced and a new reading and writing scheme has already begun to help pupils make better progress. Work is currently in hand to alter the roles and responsibilities of learning support assistants so that they can help pupils and support learning more effectively.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The changes to the building, especially in the nursery, mean that the environment is better suited for pupils of this age. Visits have been made to outstanding nurseries so that the staff can see excellent practice and learn from it. Pupils’ progress is carefully checked and there is a much sharper emphasis on quickly providing extra support for children who need it. A new scheme to work closely with families, in order to improve attendance and pupil progress, supported by Barnardo’s and the local borough council, has also begun to have a positive effect.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The headteacher and senior leadership team check the work in lessons by visiting classes frequently. Teachers are held to account for their work and there is a steely determination that children should be given the best possible help and teaching.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The governing body is fully involved in the school’s plans for improvement. It is very aware of what has to be done and has taken decisive action to improve its own skills. It has had training in how to review the work of the school and has devised a well-constructed plan to follow this through. Further training in understanding data is planned. Its commissioning of an external review to consider its own effectiveness is evidence of its determination to improve the school.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The local authority has worked with the school to develop a statement of action which provides strong support. It includes consultancy from specialist advisers, as well as regular visits by the principal inspector to evaluate the impact of the actions taken. It provides a good basis from which to build.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school’s action plan is fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The local authority’s statement of action is fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Hampshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion