Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Postcode verified
BB7 2AL
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 111
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Mrs A Callon Headteacher Clitheroe Pendle Primary School Princess Avenue Clitheroe Lancashire BB7 2AL
p.1
Ofsted 2012–13 subject survey inspection programme: English
Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit on 8 May 2013 to look at work in English.
p.1
Ofsted 2012–13 subject survey inspection programme: English
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.
p.1
Ofsted 2012–13 subject survey inspection programme: English
The evidence used to inform the judgements included: meetings with you, the English subject leader and the assessment coordinator; interviews with five pupils from Year 6; hearing three Year 2 pupils read; review of information about pupils’ progress; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of a sample of work in books and on display; and observation of eight sessions, including phonics and guided reading.
p.1
Ofsted 2012–13 subject survey inspection programme: English
The overall effectiveness of English is outstanding.
p.1
Ofsted 2012–13 subject survey inspection programme: English
Standards at the end of Year 6 have been well above average in four of the last five years and current data indicate a similar picture. Children start strongly in Reception and, by the end of Year 2, many are proficient readers and writers. Pupils are very well prepared for secondary education. Year 6 pupils are highly confident, articulate speakers and able readers and writers. Their work is often more representative of pupils a year or two older. Writing is a particular strength; it is neatly presented with generally accurate spelling and grammar. Whether a story, poem, report or letter, it is very well structured with mature, often adventurous use of a wide range of punctuation, words and phrases. Pupils are used to drafting and editing their work on paper but less so using a word processor. Boys and girls enjoy reading and writing; they agree that ’literacy is fun’. They read at home, use the school library and talk sensibly about their
p.1
Ofsted 2012–13 subject survey inspection programme: English
reading tastes. Younger pupils use their phonic knowledge to segment and blend words but also draw on clues from the text and pictures. They progress to reading aloud confidently, often with good expression and understanding. Year 2 partners helped one another to read information downloaded from QR codes hidden in the wildlife garden and then matched it to the right mini-beast. Pupils from Years 6, 3 and 4 showed good skills in inference and deduction when they discussed the differing personalities and emotional responses of characters in stories. Pupils’ progress in English is outstanding over time. In 2012, all Year 6 pupils, including those eligible for pupil premium funding, made the two levels’ progress expected nationally at Key Stage 2, and just over 40% made three levels’ progress in reading and in writing. This was far higher than the national average. Current data also indicate a positive picture.
p.2
Ofsted 2012–13 subject survey inspection programme: English
Pupils make very good gains in their knowledge and skills because of consistently strong teaching and support from teachers and teaching assistants. Well-tailored, skilful help enables pupils with particular needs to succeed, or to catch up in their reading and writing. Teachers plan lessons carefully, often using activities that engage the pupils fully. For instance, Year 1 pupils were keen to rewrite instructions to help the class puppet grow cress seeds. Similarly, pupils in Years 3 and 4, having seen a video clip of someone falling overboard, became engrossed in writing their own dramatic stories and then posed searching questions to pupils who took the ‘hot seat’ in the role of ‘skipper’ or ‘man overboard’. The teachers share an enthusiasm for English and their subject knowledge is secure. Their high expectations of pupils are met because they model and explain expertly what makes an effective reader and writer. They have
p.2
Ofsted 2012–13 subject survey inspection programme: English
provided useful aids, such as questions for parents to ask when their children are reading non-fiction, and key word and alphabet ‘mats’ to support younger pupils’ independent writing. The adults are quick to praise, to encourage and to give constructive feedback. Pupils respond to points for improvement and are also adept at commenting on each other’s work. There is scope to refine this and also teachers’ marking to give an explicit overview of how well success criteria have been met and what will make a difference next time. The curriculum in English is outstanding.
p.2
Ofsted 2012–13 subject survey inspection programme: English
All pupils become steeped in listening, speaking, reading and writing because the school is very successful in providing a purpose and audience for them to apply their skills. Year 5 pupils, for instance, as part of a study of rivers, looked at the language of poems about rivers before drafting their own. Classrooms and corridors have vibrant displays of pupils’ work and pupils are proud of their contributions. Pupils also benefit from a rich programme of additional activities including contributions to the diary of Travelling Ted, reading challenges, script-to- screen workshops and theatre visits. The curriculum has changed this year to prepare Year 6 pupils for the new national test in spelling, punctuation and grammar. The school is looking at ways to heighten this work throughout the school. Likewise, changes in how phonics is taught reflect the outcome of the school’s review of its results in the first national phonics test for Year 1 pupils. Although there is
p.2
Ofsted 2012–13 subject survey inspection programme: English
a firm emphasis on fostering younger pupils’ reading and writing through writing tables, notices and displays, there is little in the ‘home corner’ or outdoor play areas to boost spontaneous use of print. Opportunities are also missed in the school library to create a truly inviting place to read.
p.3
Ofsted 2012–13 subject survey inspection programme: English
Leadership and management of English are outstanding.
p.3
Ofsted 2012–13 subject survey inspection programme: English
You and your staff value literacy and language in its widest sense, and share a commitment to helping each pupil achieve his/her best. You and the governors have taken effective strategic decisions to maximise the skills and strengths of staff and to make optimal use of finances to ensure high quality provision in English. The subject leader keeps abreast of national and local initiatives. Good use is being made, for example, of local authority advice on activities appropriate for guided reading sessions.
p.3
Ofsted 2012–13 subject survey inspection programme: English
The audit and self-evaluation of English provision was accurate and drew on a wide range of evidence including evidence from monitoring teaching and learning, and an analysis of achievement. Leaders know how well different groups of pupils are doing and recent refinements to the tracking system have given a clear picture compared with national figures. The action plan for literacy reflects the review of pupils’ achievement last year. It identifies relevant priorities but the success criteria are too general to structure a critical evaluation of the action taken.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
exploring additional ways to use information and communication technology as a medium for writing creating a stronger invitation to read and write as part of indoor and outdoor play for the youngest pupils, and in the school library.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop English in the school.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion