Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 28 May 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Margaret Farrow

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Margaret Farrow

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+9Mostly positivemore positive than 29% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandinghighly effectivepositivelyeffectivepreciseimproving
Criticismnot good enoughweaknessweaknessesfalling behindnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
759
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566862 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: rcowley@cfbt.com

p.1

Mrs Patricia Monk Headteacher North Park Primary School Bessemer Green Spennymoor County Durham DL16 6PP

p.1

Education act 2005 to North Park Primary School, Durham

Following my visit to your school on 7 May 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Education act 2005 to North Park Primary School, Durham

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in March 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit I held meetings with the headteacher, middle leaders, representatives of the governing body including the Chair and a representative of the local authority’s education development service. I reviewed a range of documents including the school’s improvement plans, governing body minutes and records of recent lesson observations.

p.1

Context

There have been no significant changes to the school’s organisation since the inspection.

p.1

Main findings

The key issues identified for improvement at the time of the inspection were in the school’s improvement plans and were being acted upon with the support of local authority advisers. The headteacher, governing body and local authority officers have redoubled their efforts to improve the Early Years Foundation Stage, the quality of teaching and extending the role and impact of middle managers since the inspection. Plans were quickly adapted and implemented to take account of the inspection findings, with appropriate actions and precise targets to hasten the improvements needed. A range of work to improve teaching is taking place including short-term focused support plans and training for teachers whose teaching is not good enough. The good practice in teaching, evident in school at the time of the inspection, has been shared with staff. However opportunities for teachers and teaching assistants to see outstanding practice in

p.1

Main findings

other schools are not yet in place. Middle managers are now fully involved in monitoring teaching, reviewing pupils’ work and teachers’ planning. With the headteacher they review teachers’ assessment information on pupils’ progress in lessons to make sure pupils who are falling behind get additional help in lessons or in groups to help them catch up. Managers speak positively of their wider roles and the increased accountabilities and responsibilities they have been given since the inspection. The teaching of phonics (the letters that sounds represent) to younger pupils was identified as a weakness during the inspection. Leaders immediately changed the way phonics is taught in the Early Years Foundation Stage and Key Stage 1.

p.2

Main findings

Governors have recognised the need to be more vigilant in checking how well the school is improving. They have increased the number of meetings and range of work they undertake. This includes the use of curriculum walks with the headteacher to check that actions to tackle the school’s weaknesses are being delivered by staff. A small group of governors have received training from a local authority adviser in the analysis and use of data, including Ofsted’s school dashboard. All governors are to receive similar training in the near future.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommend that further action is taken to:

p.2

Main findings

 Extend opportunities for teachers and teaching assistants to see and learn from outstanding practice in relation to teaching and assessment in highly effective schools.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

Local authority advisers have worked quickly with the headteacher, governors and staff in amending the action plans by providing advice and by challenging the headteacher and governing body about the way they monitor the impact of actions being taken. Specific training for governors, in the analysis of performance data, is sharpening their skills in asking questions of the head teacher and staff. Officers are working with Early Years Foundation Stage teachers to improve provision in the unit and the way that phonics is being taught. An additional school improvement officer is working with middle managers to further develop their roles in driving the required improvements.

p.2

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children's and Adults Services for Durham.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion