Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Deborah Pacquette in Waltham Forest

Inspected 19 Mar 2013 · published 25 May 2013 · URN SC007290

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Joanna Heller

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    19 Mar 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Joanna Heller

  • URN verified

    SC007290

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+36Positivemore positive than 56% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongoutstandingpositivehigh expectationsgood progressstrong relationshipsrobustcaring
Criticisminadequatefailednot metdeclined

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings675w+36
  • What needs to improve54w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
725
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 50
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
1
typical 4
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 81%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 12%

Full report text

Unique reference number SC007290 Inspection date 19/03/2013 Inspector Joanna Heller Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home

p.1

Date of last inspection 14/11/2012 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Brief description of the service

This is one of two privately owned children's homes in the area operated by the same provider. It provides accommodation and support to four young people of either sex, aged between 11 and 18 years old. The home is registered to care for young people with emotional or behavioural difficulties and young people with a mild mental disorder.

p.3

The inspection judgements and what they mean

Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.

p.3

Progress

Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making satisfactory progress .

p.3

Progress

At the previous inspection in November 2012, the home was judged good overall with outstanding judgements in quality of care and leadership and management. Two recommendations were made at that inspection; these related to verifying references for prospective staff and ensuring the fire risk assessment is sufficiently detailed.

p.3

Progress

No staff have been employed since the last inspection. However, the manager is planning to recruit staff in the next few months and confirms that telephone calls to verify the validity of references will take place. This will reinforce the otherwise robust vetting practices that safeguard young people from unsuitable people gaining employment in the home. The manager has liaised with the local fire brigade to review fire precautionary arrangements in the home. The arrangements meet the current requirements; however, the manager plans to enhance these. The risk assessment is being currently reviewed to reflect these improvements. Young people living in the home speak very fondly of staff, who they refer to as caring and nice people. Some young people refer to staff who go 'above and beyond'. All feel safe and rated the home as good. It is clear that these positive relationships underpin individualised child-focused care and enable young people to

p.3

Progress

thrive. Young people benefit from a well-trained and competent group of staff. The home has a strong therapeutic grounding and staff have regular training in therapeutic approaches to care. Staff monitor young people’s progress and keep parents and placing authorities up to date on key events as appropriate.

p.4

Progress

Safeguarding is central to staff practice in the home and staff have been successful in helping young people reduce some of their risk-taking behaviour. Young people say that the home is generally a calm and quiet place. One young person characterised this by saying, 'I'm much calmer and I don’t get angry so quickly now.' Staff are passionate in ensuring positive outcomes for the young people and are committed to on-going training and development. Staff are well supported by the manager and responsible individual; these relationships ensure there is a strong ethos of teamwork, and staff changes are very rare. This means young people benefit from continuity of staff and enables the strong relationships between staff and young people to develop.

p.4

Progress

The home has strong leadership arrangements; the responsible individual has high expectations for staff and leads by example. The manager ensures that the quality of care provided to young people remains at the forefront of service delivery. Placing authorities are highly complimentary both about the care and regarding the relationships that the manager and staff build with the social workers.

p.4

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):

p.4

Recommendations

 ensure that avoidable hazards are removed; in particular review the fire risk assessment to ensure that it is sufficiently detailed, outlines the fire precautionary arrangements in place and how risks will be minimised. (NMS 10.3)

p.4

About this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.

p.5

About this inspection

The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion