Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Stephen Abbott
- Postcode verified
CO2 9DG
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 647
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs Jayne Mitchell Headteacher Gosbecks Primary School Owen Ward Close Shrub End Colchester CO2 9DG
p.1
Education Act 2005 to Gosbecks Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 19 April 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since my previous visit.
p.1
Education Act 2005 to Gosbecks Primary School
The visit was the second monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in September 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with the headteacher, assistant headteacher, special needs coordinator and Chair of the Governing Body. The school improvement plan, the Governor’s action plan and the recent local authority review of special educational needs provision were examined. Information about pupils’ progress since the last visit was reviewed. Short visits were made to each classroom and pupils’ books were examined to evaluate the teaching and learning of mathematics.
p.1
Context
Since the first monitoring visit, a review of governance has been undertaken with the National College of School Leadership. In addition, a review of provision for disabled pupils and those with special educational needs has been carried out by local authority advisers. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 683 9166 Direct email : helen.johnson@serco.com
p.1
Main findings
The school’s pupil tracking data shows that pupils in Key Stage 2 are currently making good progress. They have made good progress in reading, writing and mathematics over the last five terms. However, the progress of older pupils since Year 2 is not yet good. This is because they have not fully made up for the slow progress they made when they in Year 3.
p.2
Main findings
The special educational needs review shows that the school has good systems in place and that pupils’ needs are accurately assessed. A few pupils have made such good progress that they no longer need additional support. Teaching assistants are now receiving feedback following lesson observations.
p.2
Main findings
Following the review of governance, the governing body has established a performance review committee. Governors have undertaken training and are now more effective in holding the senior leaders to account for pupils’ attainment and progress.
p.2
Main findings
Since the previous visit, the school improvement plan has been strengthened. It now contains more measurable targets, timescales and milestones and shows more clearly who is responsible for different aspects of the plan. Progress reports to governors are now more frequent and easier to relate to the school’s targets.
p.2
Main findings
The teaching of mathematics is improving as a result of training, teachers observing good practice, and guidance on using visual and practical aids to develop pupils’ understanding. There is still some evidence that topics are not always taught in a consistent way in different year-groups. This was evident from looking at work on fractions across Years 2 to 6.
p.2
Main findings
Marking is conscientious, with teachers writing comments and suggesting additional tasks to help pupils improve. However, pupils do not always respond to these comments, because not enough time is set aside for them to do so.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the inspection in September 2012.
p.2
Main findings
Following the visit to the school, I recommend that further action is taken to:
p.2
Main findings
- improve the planning for progression in mathematics topics other than calculation - ensure that pupils are given time to respond to marking.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection. The school has agreed to provide regular updates on pupils’ progress. I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Essex.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion