Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Langley School

Inspected 2 May 2013 · published 24 May 2013 · URN 137007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    2 May 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Elizabeth Cooper, Glen Goddard, Susan Laffey, Terence Payne

  • Leadership and management AI-checked

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    B92 7ER

  • Name on report verified

    Langley School, Specialist College for the Performing Arts, Languages and Training

  • URN verified

    137007

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+50Positivemore positive than 11% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingexceptionallyvery wellmake good progressgood progressstronghighly effectiveenjoyment
Criticismnot alwaysinadequaterequires improvementgapspoorat riskseriousweaknesses

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1675w+65
  • Leadership875w+18
  • What needs to improve123w+54

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,595
about usual (typical 2966)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 48
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 47%Leadership 24%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 25%

Full report text

Langley School, Specialist College for the Performing Arts, Languages and Training Kineton Green Road, Olton, Solihull, B92 7ER

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Not previously inspected This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Outstanding 1 Leadership and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a good school.  Students make good progress and do well in nearly all subjects. Achievement in mathematics is outstanding.  Disabled students and those who have statements of special educational needs are exceptionally well supported and achieve well.  Students supported by the pupil premium are making increasingly good progress.  Teaching is good, with a growing proportion of outstanding lessons.  Teaching in the performing arts is a strength, contributing well to students’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development.  The behaviour and safety of students are outstanding. Attendance is very high, showing students’ considerable enjoyment of their time at the school. Students feel safe and show courtesy towards staff, visitors and each other.  Through its on-site theatre and sports centre, the school has considerable links with the local community and many schools.  The headteacher and the leadership team are

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

dedicated to improving the school. Senior staff make regular checks on the quality of teaching. Morale among the staff is high.  Governors know the school very well, giving good challenge and support to senior leaders.

p.1

It is not yet an outstanding school because

 There is not enough outstanding teaching to make sure that as many students as possible make outstanding progress.  Students do not always have the opportunity to discuss their learning together in lessons.  Teachers do not always give students regular feedback to help students improve. Students are not always given time in lessons to respond to teachers’ written comments, so that they can improve their work. Inspection report: Langley School, Specialist College for the Performing Arts, Languages and Training, 1– 2 May 2013 2 of 10

p.1

Information about this inspection

 The inspectors observed 42 lessons taught by 40 teachers. Twelve lessons were observed jointly with members of the senior leadership team. Inspectors also made shorter visits to a number of lessons. Students’ work was examined during lessons and during a meeting with a senior leader.  Meetings were held with three groups of students, staff, three members of the governing body and a consultant from the local authority. Inspectors listened to some Year 7 and Year 8 students read.  The inspection team considered the views expressed in the 200 responses to the on-line Parent View survey, together with two letters received from parents and telephone conversations with three parents.  The inspection team took into account the views of staff, including those given in 66 staff questionnaires.  The inspectors observed the school’s work, including the school’s analysis of how well it is doing and its improvement plan. Inspectors considered policies, minutes of the governing body and

p.2

Information about this inspection

documents relating to behaviour, safeguarding and other aspects of the school’s work. Inspectors analysed information provided by the school showing students’ progress. The school’s website was also a comprehensive source of information.

p.2

Inspection team

Elizabeth Cooper, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Susan Laffey Additional Inspector Terence Payne Additional Inspector Glen Goddard Additional Inspector Inspection report: Langley School, Specialist College for the Performing Arts, Languages and Training, 1– 2 May 2013 3 of 10

p.2

Information about this school

 Langley School, Specialist College for the Performing Arts, Languages and Training, is an average-sized secondary school for students from Years 7 to 11.  The proportion of disabled students and those who have special educational needs is above the national average. The school runs two specialist units on behalf of the local authority for around 40 students with specific learning difficulties or with physical difficulties.  The proportion of students known to be eligible for the pupil premium (the additional funding provided by the government) is below average. In this school, the pupil premium provides additional funding for looked-after children and for students known to be eligible for free school meals.  The majority of students are White British, with around one-quarter of students of minority ethnic heritage. The proportion of students who are at an early stage of learning English is low.

p.3

Information about this school

 A small number of students attend vocational courses off site, including at Solihull College and Hazel Oak Special School.  As a performing arts college, the school led the way in pioneering the National Arts Award and was the first school in the country to receive this award. The school’s on-site Dovehouse Theatre hosts local and national productions and performances.  Langley School converted to academy status in August 2011. When its predecessor school was last inspected by Ofsted in 2006, it was judged to be outstanding.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Increase the amount of outstanding teaching and learning by making sure that all teachers:  give students even more opportunities to learn on their own and with other members of their class  provide feedback to students throughout lessons, so that students know how well they are doing and what they need to do next to improve  give students sufficient time in lessons to respond to teachers’ written comments in their books, so that students can improve on their work  have more opportunities to exchange ideas about teaching so that they learn from each other and further improve their skills. Inspection report: Langley School, Specialist College for the Performing Arts, Languages and Training, 1– 2 May 2013 4 of 10

p.3

The achievement of pupils is good

 When students start in Year 7, their levels of attainment are in line with the national average. Students who completed their examinations in 2012 and those currently in Year 11 attained above the national average before joining the school.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 In 2012, the number of students gaining five GCSEs at grades A* to C, including English and mathematics, and those achieving the English Baccalaureate well has risen to well above the national average.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 The proportion of students making good or better progress in mathematics was much higher than nationally in 2012. However, a few higher-ability students did not do quite as well as expected in English. The school is using data from tests to check students’ progress more frequently and make sure all students are on track. Information from the school shows that students in Year 10 and Year 11 are close to meeting ambitious targets in English as well as in mathematics.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Although most students made good or better progress in biology, chemistry and physics and in the core science examination, some students did not do well in additional science. Recognising that some students are better suited to a more work-related approach, the school entered some students for BTEC science instead of GCSE. The external check of students’ BTEC work proved that this was an appropriate decision, with much better results predicted in science.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Some students are entered for mathematics early, with more-able students taking their GCSE at the end of Year 10 and going on to achieve high-quality results in statistics during Year 11. The school has continued to enter some students during Year 11, including two middle-attaining groups whose recent good results have motivated students to improve on their grades.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Disabled students and those who have special educational needs make good progress because of the good support provided by teachers and other adults in lessons. Students attending the specialist resource base achieve as well as other students in the school with special educational needs.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 A few students were educated away from the school for one or two days each week on a variety of work-related courses. The school checked their attendance and progress regularly. These students gained English, mathematics and other work-related qualifications at school, before continuing to post-16 education. A small number of students who attend work-related courses away from the school site this year are also expected to gain relevant qualifications.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Pupil premium funding has paid for a range of activities, including extra tuition, ‘This Way Up’ mentoring, revision guides and breakfast clubs. In English, students known to be eligible for the pupil premium were just over one year behind those who were not. In mathematics, the gap between students eligible for the pupil premium and those who were not reduced from two years behind to one year, with students performing much better than similar students nationally. The gaps are being narrowed even more at Key Stage 3. There were too few looked-after children to comment on their standards without identifying individuals.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Year 7 catch-up funding is being spent well to improve students’ reading and mathematics skills, and electronic books and mathematics computer programmes are helping to motivate students. Inspection report: Langley School, Specialist College for the Performing Arts, Languages and Training, 1–2 May 2013 5 of 10

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

Pupils are making rapid progress in reading because of the extra help in small groups.

p.5

The achievement of pupils is good

 In most of the lessons observed, students made at least good progress and in a few lessons, they made outstanding progress because of exceptionally good teaching.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 There has been a strong focus on improving the quality of teaching so that teaching is now typically good, with a small number of outstanding lessons seen during the inspection.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Teachers have a good knowledge of their subjects and plan their lessons well, with interesting and varied activities; this allows most lessons to move at a good pace.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Students enjoy lessons where teachers give them demanding work which makes them think. In an outstanding Year 10 German lesson, pairs of students practised speaking about sport with great enthusiasm. They helped each other become highly confident in their language skills, while gaining substantial insight into what they needed to know for their speaking examination. Not all lessons were as challenging as this, even where teaching was good.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Teachers’ questioning is often good, especially where teachers ask extra questions to help students develop their thinking further or show how much they know. This happened in an outstanding Year 10 food studies lesson where the teacher’s skilful questions checked that students could explain in detail what they had learnt about healthy eating.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Teachers make sure that students know the specialist words they need for their subject. In science and in design and technology lessons, students used mathematical skills well to make sure their work was accurate.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 In the few lessons requiring improvement, teachers spent too long introducing the lesson or explaining tasks. Although teachers asked questions, students had fewer opportunities to give reasons for their answers. This meant that students had less time to think through their ideas.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Students know their targets and what they have to do to improve their work, but teachers do not always give students enough feedback in their lessons to help them make even more progress. In students’ written work, many teachers write detailed comments, offering clear guidance on what students need to do to improve. However, students are not often given the time to follow up the suggestions made by their teachers. This means that they do not learn as much from their teachers’ advice.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Teachers provide good opportunities for students to develop their spiritual, moral, social and cultural understanding. In a Year 10 English lesson, students argued passionately about who was most to blame for Eva Smith’s death in ‘An Inspector Calls’, showing their grasp of the moral issues involved. In an outstanding Year 9 drama lesson, students of all abilities worked exceptionally well in their groups, gaining insight into the Japanese culture of respect towards older people. In their Human Arts lessons taught by a specialist instructor, students who find it difficult to settle at school have time to reflect and develop a greater sense of self-worth.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding

 Students are very courteous and polite towards staff, other students and visitors to the school. They can be relied upon to behave safely and responsibly when moving around the busy school Inspection report: Langley School, Specialist College for the Performing Arts, Languages and Training, 1–2 May 2013 6 of 10

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding

site to their lessons and during the lunchtime.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding

 Students show considerable respect towards each other, working harmoniously with their classmates in lessons. Students were seen helping other students with disabilities who found it harder to move around the site.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding

 In their lessons, students thrive especially where the work interests them and they are fully involved. Even where teaching is occasionally not as good, students are almost without exception willing to make every effort in their lessons.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding

 All students who spoke with inspectors said how safe the school is at all times. Students know how to keep themselves safe and are well-informed about the risks involved in using internet and social networking sites.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding

 Students say that bullying is rare, and their views are backed up by the low number of recorded incidents of bullying at the school. Students have a clear understanding of the different types of bullying and are entirely confident that the school will always take swift action if bullying occurs.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding

 The number of students not allowed in school for a short period because of poor behaviour has reduced considerably in recent years. Where this occurs, students are given plenty of support to help them settle back quickly into school routines.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding

 The school has worked single-mindedly to raise attendance. Year 8 students clapped spontaneously after a lively assembly on ‘What’s the point of coming to school?’ and applauded students who had the best attendance of the week. The school’s target of 95% attendance was achieved in 2012, with equally high attendance continuing during this year.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The headteacher, ably supported by senior leaders, has a consistent ambition for all members of the school ‘to be the best they can be’. All who responded to the staff questionnaire expressed their pride in being a member of staff at the school: as one respondent explained, ‘We work towards promoting the individual, no matter what barriers they face.’

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Students are set challenging targets and their progress towards them is carefully tracked. The strong focus on raising the attainment of any students at risk of underachieving, including students eligible for the pupil premium, has helped to narrow the gaps in attainment between different groups of students.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 School leaders and teachers in charge of areas of the school’s work have an accurate view of what the school does well and which aspects need to improve. They check how good lessons are through formal observations and informal visits. Training has helped teachers improve teaching, but they do not always have the opportunity to share ideas about how to make lessons outstanding.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The school has thorough and consistent systems of performance management, and targets shared across all teachers have already made a difference to students’ progress. Teachers are held to account in line with the national standards and are rewarded only where their teaching is consistently good.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The school has continued its links with the local authority, with the local authority adviser giving Inspection report: Langley School, Specialist College for the Performing Arts, Languages and Training, 1–2 May 2013 7 of 10

p.6

The leadership and management are good

effective challenge and support to the school through regular visits. The school’s work with other schools in mathematics, languages and performing arts is greatly valued by the local authority.

p.7

The leadership and management are good

 The curriculum is broad and balanced. The school looks regularly at the different courses it provides to make sure that the qualifications offered match students’ skills and abilities. Following some weaker results within science and design and technology, the school offered more vocational courses to students, with resultant improvements in the standard of students’ work. The many extra-curricular activities offered, ranging from the early morning orchestra to lunchtime indoor hockey and the after-school cookery club, contribute to students’ enjoyment and their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. Modern language visits, the Africa Day and fundraising for charities at home and abroad have helped to expand students’ global understanding.

p.7

The leadership and management are good

 The school enjoys good relationships with parents, carers and the community. Parents’ and carers’ views are regularly sought and acted upon. Most parents have confidence in the school, especially in how well it makes sure that their children are safe and well looked after.

p.7

The leadership and management are good

 Safeguarding procedures are thorough and meet all requirements, and there is a high level of care for individual students.

p.7

The leadership and management are good

 The governance of the school:  Governors provide well-informed challenge to the school’s leadership. They have played an active role in planning for the school’s further improvement through the ‘Vision and Values’ project, working closely with senior leaders and seeking the views of staff and students.  Governors bring a good range of relevant skills to their role. They take part in regular training, including how to interpret results data. This helps them look beneath the headlines to find out how well the school is doing compared to other schools nationally, and to ask searching questions about what else needs to be improved.  Governors visit the school regularly, going into lessons and meeting with school leaders and staff. As a result, they are well informed about the quality of teaching. They make sure that teachers are only awarded additional pay and promotion where their teaching is good or

p.7

The leadership and management are good

better.  Financial management is very efficient. Governors know how the use of the pupil premium is contributing to the rising standards of students who benefit from this funding. Inspection report: Langley School, Specialist College for the Performing Arts, Languages and Training, 1– 2 May 2013 8 of 10

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. Inspection report: Langley School, Specialist College for the Performing Arts, Languages and Training, 1– 2 May 2013 9 of 10

p.8

School details

Unique reference number 137007 Local authority Solihull Inspection number 412292

p.9

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.9

School details

Type of school Academy converter School category Non-maintained Age range of pupils 11–16 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 1002 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Rev. Peter Bates Headteacher Philip Talbot Date of previous school inspection N/A Telephone number 0121 706 9771 Fax number 0121 706 8715 Email address office@langley-sec.solihull.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.10

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.10

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.10

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion