Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

St Mary and St Margaret's Church of England Aided Primary School

Inspected 14 Mar 2013 · published 22 Apr 2013 · URN 104097

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    14 Mar 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Anthony Green, Helen Masefield, Rodney Braithwaite

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    B36 9AX

  • Name on report verified

    St Mary and St Margaret's Church of England Aided Primary School

  • URN verified

    104097

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2011.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+67Positivemore positive than 46% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexcellentoutstandingimprovedstronglyeffectivemake good progressgood progressenthusiastic
Criticismnot alwaysinadequaterequires improvementpoorseriousweaknessesconcernsnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1387w+83
  • Leadership667w+39
  • What needs to improve114w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,094
shorter than usual (typical 2966)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 48
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 47%Leadership 22%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 27%

Full report text

St Mary and St Margaret's Church of England Aided Primary School Southfield Avenue, Castle Bromwich, Birmingham, B36 9AX

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a good school.  Pupils’ attainment has improved consistently in all year groups in the last two years. Most pupils make good progress in reading, writing and mathematics and achieve well.  Teaching is good and sometimes outstanding. Strong relationships promote pupils’ confident, thoughtful and enthusiastic attitudes to learning.  Pupils’ behaviour is good. Staff ensure that pupils are well cared for and safe.  The school is led very effectively by a decisive and ambitious headteacher who has built a good staff including an increasingly influential senior leadership team.  Pupils are provided with a rich and stimulating range of learning activities which contribute strongly to improving their literacy and numeracy skills and their excellent spiritual, moral, social and cultural development.  The governing body is closely involved in the drive for improvement, and is playing a more active role in the performance management of

p.1

It is not yet an outstanding school because

 Pupils are not guided sufficiently to present their work neatly and accurately. The style of handwriting varies considerably across the school.  The use of home-school logbooks does not always promote a useful dialogue between teachers and parents about pupils’ learning, particularly for older pupils. Inspection report: St Mary and St Margaret's Church of England Aided Primary School, 13–14 March 2013 2 of 10

p.1

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed 22 lessons taught by 12 teachers. Eight lessons were observed jointly with the headteacher or deputy headteacher.  Meetings were held with pupils, the headteacher and deputy headteacher, members of the management team and three members of the governing body. A telephone discussion took place with a representative of the local authority.  Inspectors observed the school’s work. They examined the school’s improvement plans and self- evaluation, safeguarding arrangements, health and safety files and records, school policies, external evaluations of the school’s effectiveness and a range of pupils’ work.  Inspectors took account of 39 responses to the online Parent View survey as well as a letter from a parent.  The inspectors also examined questionnaire responses from 29 members of staff.

p.2

Inspection team

Rodney Braithwaite, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Anthony Green Additional Inspector Helen Masefield Additional Inspector Inspection report: St Mary and St Margaret's Church of England Aided Primary School, 13–14 March 2013 3 of 10

p.2

Information about this school

 St Mary and St Margaret’s Aided Primary School is an average-sized primary school.  Nearly all pupils are White British, the remainder coming from a range of other ethnic heritages.  The proportion of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs supported through school action is below average.  The proportion of pupils supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is average.  The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for support through the pupil premium (additional funding for looked after children, pupils known to be eligible for free school meals and children of service families) is below average. There are currently no children of service families in the school.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for attainment and progress.  Since the last inspection, there have been a number of changes of teaching staff, including the

p.3

Information about this school

appointment of a new deputy headteacher.  The Early Years Foundation Stage consists of a Nursery and a Reception class.  In addition, the governing body provides a ‘wrap around facility’ called the ‘Nest’, where school staff teach and manage an afternoon class of three-year-old children. This was included in the inspection.  There are privately managed clubs for children before and after school on the school site. These were not included in the inspection.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Make sure that teachers’ expectations of pupils’ presentation of their work results in high quality in all years by:  encouraging pupils to always take care and pride when setting out their work and ensuring that there is a consistent approach to using rulers and rubbers  developing handwriting skills, including letter formation and joins, so that there is greater consistency across the school.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Increase the use of the home-school logbooks and ensure that the dialogue between parents and staff supports the progress and learning needs of pupils, especially in Key Stage 2. Inspection report: St Mary and St Margaret's Church of England Aided Primary School, 13–14 March 2013 4 of 10

p.3

The achievement of pupils is good

 Nearly all children start in the Nursery with skills, knowledge and understanding below those expected for their age. Children make good progress in the Nursery and Reception classes, particularly in their language development and in their social skills.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Evidence from a wide range of data, including lesson observations and the work in pupils’ books, shows that most boys and girls are making good progress in reading, writing and mathematics in all year groups. This includes disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs, more-able pupils, and the small number of pupils from minority ethnic heritages.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Some past anomalies in teachers’ analysis of pupils’ progress in writing in Key Stage 1 have been ironed out by the school’s rigorous review of pupils’ work and close analysis of progress data. As a result of the action taken, pupils’ progress has accelerated. Current pupils in Year 2 are on track to reach at least average standards in writing with a good proportion reaching the higher Level 3.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Attainment in mathematics in Key Stage 2 has improved over recent years and most pupils make good progress and achieve well. Pupils in Year 6, for example, showed the benefits of the improvements in their mathematical skills in a lesson when recalling the properties of quadrilaterals, and their knowledge of several different strategies when multiplying high numbers.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Achievement in reading is good because the school is ensuring that pupils have a thorough understanding of letters and sounds (phonics) that help them recognise and spell new words. This starts in the Nursery and builds over time with pupils practising reading regularly. Their good grasp of phonics was reflected positively in the screening of Year 1 pupils in 2012, by the above average results.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Pupils throughout the school read for enjoyment and often widely. Boys, especially, have improved their literacy skills because the school is providing much more appealing resources to cater for their particular interests. Sometimes, the untidy presentation of work and poor handwriting detract from pupils’ otherwise high quality writing.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 The skilled and well-planned interventions of teachers and teaching assistants ensure that pupils with statements of special educational needs are achieving as well as other pupils.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Most pupils eligible for support through the pupil premium have not reached similar levels of attainment to other pupils in the school in both English and mathematics in the past, as measured by their average point scores at the end of Key Stage 2. However data on their progress shows almost all are now making good progress because of effective support, with the result that they are quickly catching up with their classmates.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Currently, more pupils than in the past in Year 6 are on track to reach above-average standards in English and mathematics.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Teaching in the school is good and sometimes outstanding. For example, excellent teaching promoted outstanding learning in Year 4 when pupils used a strategy of paper cutting to deepen their understanding of the place value of numbers.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Teachers have high expectations and good subject knowledge. For example, in a Year 6 lesson, the teacher enabled pupils to make rapid gains when learning how to use passive and active sentences and subordinate clauses in their own writing through their study of classic sea poems.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Occasionally, expectations about the presentation of work are not high enough. There is too little consistency in letter formation and pupils’ handwriting styles. Simple routines, such as the appropriate use of rulers and rubbers are not promoted strongly enough. In consequence some work has good content but is untidy.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Teaching in the Nursery and Reception classes is good, and children are learning basic skills rapidly and developing independence and self-confidence. However, partly as a result of the ‘Nest’ being in a separate building, school leaders recognise that the learning intentions set out by staff are not always focused well enough on ensuring consistently good or better learning.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Relationships between staff and pupils are a strength of the school and strongly benefit learning. All teachers check pupils’ learning thoroughly and use the information to plan lessons that meet pupils’ different abilities. The system for checking progress has improved markedly in the last two years.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Teachers have improved their questioning skills considerably, taking into account far better the capabilities of each pupil so that not only is there good equality for all to contribute but more- able learners are routinely asked to ‘dig deep’ when they answer questions.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Teachers give useful feedback to pupils about how they are doing and how they can improve their work. Marking and verbal guidance are effective, and most pupils are very clear about their learning targets. However there is little dialogue in the ‘home-school logbooks’ about how parents and carers can support their child’s progress, particularly in Key Stage 2.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Learning support assistants work very effectively and provide many valuable learning interventions for disabled pupils, those with special educational needs, and pupils funded by the pupil premium and this is reflected in their good progress.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils’ behaviour is good as confirmed by parents and staff who are almost unanimous in agreeing that this is typical.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 During the inspection, behaviour was often excellent, especially in lessons that involved ‘hands- on’ learning experiences. Pupils are friendly and cooperative. They know how to behave safely such as when swimming in the school’s own pool, handling large brass musical instruments, or making curry in the cookery club.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Children in the Nest, Nursery and Reception classes mix happily together and quickly become familiar with routines and how they are expected to behave.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils have enthusiastic attitudes to their learning. In discussion they mention a wide variety of learning experiences they have enjoyed. For example, they have dressed as characters from books, made boxes for Second World War gas masks, and enjoyed visits to the Botanical Gardens and the National Space Centre.  Pupils say they have no experience of bullying in school, although a few parents expressed concerns but feel that any instances are dealt with effectively. Pupils have a good understanding of the dangers of cyber bullying but none has any awareness of this happening to anyone in school. There have been no pupil exclusions from school in the last year.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils’ behaviour is strongly supported by the excellent provision in the school for their spiritual, moral, social and cultural education which is promoted in all years, as for example in Reception when children all joined in a prayer at the end of the morning.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Attendance has traditionally been above average in the school. It has fallen slightly in this school year, almost entirely as a result of a very contagious sickness bug before Christmas.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The headteacher, strongly supported by the deputy headteacher, has driven improvement energetically and with considerable success since the previous inspection. Notable strengths include increasing the amount of good or better teaching, providing challenging work for more able pupils, and helping pupils to understand their learning targets. These features together with pupils’ good achievement highlight the school’s good capacity for sustained improvement.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The staff are enthusiastic to help the school move forward and the increasingly effective management team are well focussed on ensuring that pupils’ achievement is the best it can be.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The monitoring and evaluation of teaching and learning, has been developed rigorously leading to significant improvement and has ensured that there is no inadequate teaching in the school.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The training needs of staff including those of newly qualified teachers are an integral part of the school’s accurate self-evaluation and action planning. Teachers’ targets are closely related to improving pupils’ progress, as well as meeting both the school and individual needs.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The development of a wider range of learning activities across all subjects has helped in the promotion of pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural education. This has been very noticeable in the improvement of pupils’ knowledge of the different faiths and cultures in modern British society.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 School leaders promote equal opportunities and cooperation strongly. This results in no discrimination through gender, ethnic heritage, disability or special educational needs.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Use of the pupil premium funding is monitored robustly by leaders and the governing body. Funding is clearly targeted at raising achievement including one-to-one support, enrichment resources, the provision of wider learning opportunities and family support, especially in mathematics and reading.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The local authority has been supportive and effective in assisting the school’s good improvement, particularly in mathematics.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The school has excellent relationships with parents virtually all of whom would recommend it to others.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The governance of the school:  Members of the governing body, led by an experienced long serving Chair, have a good knowledge of the schools’ strengths and improvement priorities. They are intensely proud of the pupils and staff, but are always ready to challenge leaders especially about pupils’ progress and achievement. They have several active committees, and visit the school regularly to see how things are going. Governors set clear performance targets for the headteacher that link closely to pay scales. They are extending their knowledge about salary progression relating to the quality of teaching and its effect on pupils’ progress. Governors make sure that school policies are regularly reviewed and that safeguarding arrangements meet regulatory requirements. Inspection report: St Mary and St Margaret's Church of England Aided Primary School, 13–14 March 2013 8 of 10

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. Inspection report: St Mary and St Margaret's Church of England Aided Primary School, 13–14 March 2013 9 of 10

p.8

School details

Unique reference number 104097 Local authority Solihull Inspection number 404924

p.9

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.9

School details

Type of school Primary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 3–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 251 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Dennis Jorden Headteacher Mark Street Date of previous school inspection 14 February 2011 Telephone number 0121 7472025 Fax number 0121 7303180 Email address office@ss-m-and-m.solihull.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.10

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.10

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.10

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion