Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Anne Seneviratne
- Postcode verified
WN8 9TG
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 993
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566862 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: rcowley@cfbt.com
p.1
Mr Stephen Ball Headteacher New Charter Academy Broadoak Road Ashton-Under-lyne OL6 8RF
p.1
Education act 2005 to New Charter Academy, Tameside
Following my visit to your school on 1 May 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Education act 2005 to New Charter Academy, Tameside
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in March 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, I met with you, other senior leaders, the Chair of the Governing Body, who is also a representative from the sponsor, two other members of the governing body and two groups of students. I evaluated the academy’s improvement plan and scrutinised other key documentation. I also had the opportunity to accompany you on a tour of the academy.
p.1
Context
Since the last inspection, a lead practitioner and three other teachers have been appointed in mathematics and two other teachers in information and communication technology/business.
p.1
Main findings
The academy improvement plan, which has been written in response to the recent inspection, provides a clear route map for how senior leaders will bring about sustained improvement. There are clear lines of responsibility and actions are underpinned by the academy’s ethos that all students will, `learn, grow, achieve´. Senior leaders and governors are not interested in quick fixes and are investing time, energy and resources into more long term strategies to tackle underachievement.
p.2
Main findings
The academy’s procedures for quality assurance are very thorough. The next round of lesson observations and work scrutiny was due to commence soon after the last inspection. However, senior leaders took the decision to postpone this until after a programme of staff training had taken place. Staff have been given clear guidelines about expectations following this training. The round of lesson observations and work scrutiny which is planned for next month is intended to enable leaders to measure the impact of this training. Students spoken to have already noticed a difference. For example they have more opportunity to explore their learning independently and, in mathematics in particular, students say the work they are given is better suited to their individual needs.
p.2
Main findings
An area for improvement from the last inspection was to ensure that all teachers applied the academy’s behaviour policy and procedures consistently. Senior leaders believe that a more `root and branch´ approach is required as the policies and procedures themselves are too reactive and do nothing to address the causes of students’ inappropriate behaviour. From September, there are plans for fundamental changes to how behaviour is managed in the academy, including the creation of some new facilities. Again, those students spoken to feel that behaviour in lessons has already improved since the recent inspection.
p.2
Main findings
Following the last inspection, senior leaders have produced a pupil premium action plan. The plan outlines a range of actions which leaders believe will narrow the gap between the achievement of those students supported by this additional funding and their peers. These actions however, are not linked to measurable milestones and there is no clear indication of how they will be monitored and evaluated at regular intervals.
p.2
Main findings
The new purpose-built accommodation offers high quality facilities to staff and students in such areas as sport and performing arts. However, the open plan design of the building has also brought several challenges for senior leaders. There is nowhere in the academy for quiet learning and study and this has proved problematic for the location of the library. There are few places where confidential conversations can take place which is particularly concerning as the academy has a large proportion of vulnerable students. There is also a risk to the planned improvements to teaching and learning because of the design and layout of some of the teaching spaces.
p.2
Main findings
Governance of the academy continues to be very strong. They have supported the academy through some tough staffing decisions and, having come through this challenging time, feel that the recent inspection has given them a springboard for moving forward. The strong experience of good governance procedures which the sponsor has brought, ensures that you and your senior leaders are challenged robustly as well as supported in your actions. Senior leaders, governors and the sponsor have begun to take effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommend that further action is taken to:
p.2
Main findings
sharpen the pupil premium action plan so that leaders can measure and evaluate the impact of their actions at regular intervals resolve the accommodation issues.
p.3
Main findings
Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.3
External support
The academy receives strong and effective support from the sponsor and there is a very clear shared vision based on improving the life chances of all students. You benefit from regular meetings with a representative from the sponsor to check that everything is on track and that you have the necessary support. Through the sponsor, the academy has access to a range of partners, programmes and projects within the Greater Manchester area, such as The University of Manchester and The Royal Exchange Theatre. They also assist with community issues and offer support with human resources, asset management and finance.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and as below.
p.3
Her Majesty's Inspector
The letter should be copied to the following:
p.3
Her Majesty's Inspector
Chair of the Governing Body Local authority The academy chain The Education Funding Agency (EFA) if the school has a sixth form The lead inspector.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion