Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Elaine Taylor
- Postcode verified
PE28 5TQ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 636
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
James Stewart Principal Sawtry Community College Fen Lane Sawtry Huntingdon PE28 5TQ
p.1
Education Act 2005 to Sawtry Community College
Following my visit to your school on 7 May 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Education Act 2005 to Sawtry Community College
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in February 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, I held meetings with you and your senior leaders, the Chair of the Governing Body, five subject leaders and a group of more able students from all year groups. I evaluated the school improvement plan and other documents, including revised data on the progress students are making. The vice principal and I made a tour of the school to look at the quality of marking in students’ books.
p.1
Context
Since the last inspection two advanced skills teachers have been appointed; one in mathematics and one to lead the development of literacy across the academy. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 683 3287 Direct email : beverley.joyner@serco.com
p.1
Main findings
You have revised the school development plan to include the areas for improvement identified at the last inspection. The plan is easily accessible to leaders and governors. Those I met clearly understood the priorities. You should include greater detail of how the progress in achieving the aims will be monitored and the role of governors in the monitoring process.
p.2
Main findings
In order to address the issue of slow progress in English, you have reorganised the leadership of the subject. The English department is also developing literacy across the curriculum. A working group has been set up to develop policies and how they will be implemented and a new leader has been appointed to take charge of the work. The school’s monitoring shows that more students are now making the progress expected of them in English.
p.2
Main findings
Discussion with a group of more able students indicated that teachers provide too few opportunities in lessons to stretch and challenge them in order to improve their progress. They also confirmed that the regularity and quality of teachers’ marking is still variable, but they could tell that the academy’s leaders were taking action to improve this aspect of teaching. Subject leaders look regularly at a random sample of students’ work.
p.2
Main findings
You are working to increase the proportion of good or better teaching by linking groups of teachers with complementary skills. Teachers are observing each other and sharing ideas and good practice.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders of the sixth form have improved the systems for monitoring the progress that the students are making to enable them to focus mentoring accurately on each student’s needs.
p.2
Main findings
Governors have prepared well for the six new members who will soon join the governing body by organising training in advance of them taking up their posts. They are taking advantage of other training on offer and have completed an informal review of the effectiveness of their work.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders and governors have begun to take effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommend that further action is taken to:
p.2
Main findings
increase opportunities to challenge more able students in lessons sharpen improvement planning.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection, including a further monitoring visit in the next Autumn term. I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion