Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 22 May 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Marianne Young

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Marianne Young

  • Postcode verified

    DN17 1HA

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+33Mostly positivemore positive than 41% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongeffectivelyimprovingvery wellimprovedconfidentpositivelysafe
Criticismlacktoo oftenweakfailsnot alwaysweakeryet touneven

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1032w+12
  • Leadership464w+72

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,496
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 38, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 67%Leadership 30%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Mrs Angela Briggs Principal Melior Community Academy Chandos Road Scunthorpe Lincolnshire DN17 1HA

p.1

Academy

Following my visit with Jan Bennett Her Majesty’s Inspector to your academy on 30 April and 1 May 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings.

p.1

Academy

The inspection was a monitoring inspection carried out in accordance with no formal designation procedures and conducted under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was carried out because the academy’s predecessor school was judged to be a school causing concern.

p.1

Evidence

Inspectors observed the academy’s work, scrutinised documents and met with the Principal, senior and learning leaders, the Chair of the Governing Body together with the Chair of the Progress and Standards Committee and representatives of the sponsors, Schools Partnership Trust Academies (SPTA). Groups of students were spoken to at social times.

p.1

Evidence

Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Evidence

The academy is making reasonable progress in raising standards for all students. CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566932 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: hcarnall@cfbt.com

p.1

Context

Melior Community Academy opened in January 2013. It provides education for students aged 11 to 16 and is smaller than most secondary schools nationally. Forty- two per cent of the students, which is significantly higher than that seen nationally, are supported by the pupil premium, (additional government funding for children in local authority care, students known to be eligible for free school meals and students whose parents are serving in the armed forces). An above average proportion of students are supported at school action and at school action plus. Since the academy opened there has been staffing changes, particularly at senior level and there are vacancies yet to be filled at all levels with some lessons taught by teachers whose contracts are temporary.

p.2

Context

During the monitoring inspection all Year 10 students were absent undertaking work experience activities.

p.2

Achievement of pupils at the academy

The academy has a wealth of data about students’ capabilities and until recently this information was not being used well enough by teachers when they plan lessons. Inspectors saw that there has been an improvement in the way teachers use this information. The quality of teaching has also improved; combined together, these factors contribute significantly to the increase in the proportion of students working at or above the levels expected for their age.

p.2

Achievement of pupils at the academy

Lesson observations and academy data show that the pace of improvement is not only in the core subjects of English, mathematics and science and for students in Year 11, but is evident throughout the academy and within other subjects. Regular monitoring of students’ progress enables leaders to assign students to appropriate intervention programmes which begin in Year 7 through the ‘I strategy’, (identification, intervention, impact). This strategy involves parents so that they are aware of what is being done to help their child. Consequently, when teaching is strong the pace of improvement is evident for all groups of students, including those who are disabled and those who have special educational needs. However, this is not always apparent particularly when teaching is weak and where students do similar work in lessons.

p.2

Achievement of pupils at the academy

Students supported by the government’s pupil premium funding are also improving their progress both in the classroom and their attitudes to learning. This is because the additional funding is being used well to provide additional external consultant support for teachers, to purchase books chosen to involve and interest students and to employ additional support staff to work with disaffected students particularly.

p.2

Achievement of pupils at the academy

Since the academy opened, leaders can demonstrate that improvements are evident and the gap between different groups and the national average is reducing, albeit less well in a few areas. Staff give greater emphasis toward developing students’ literacy rather than their numeracy skills in lessons. Consequently, improving these important skills is patchy.

p.2

The quality of teaching

Senior leaders are relentless in their drive to improve the quality of teaching throughout the academy. Where teaching is strongest, the pace of learning is brisk, students work collaboratively to investigate and discover through ‘hands-on’ tasks, which is done enthusiastically. Books are marked regularly and students are given time to respond to the teachers’ comments and understand where they have gone wrong. Teachers have a detailed knowledge of the levels at which the students are working and the targets they should reach. Again, in the stronger lessons this information is used effectively to ensure that all groups receive work at the right level of challenge. Teachers are confident to ‘take risks’ and plan imaginative, creative lessons. However, these strong features are not securely embedded in every class; in weaker lessons, teachers lack confidence and therefore students’ progress is uneven.

p.3

The quality of teaching

Students are aware of their end of year targets and in some subjects they understand how to get there, however, this is not established throughout the academy. Too often teachers encourage students to check they have completed a task rather than reviewing what they have learnt and how this contributes to improving their progress. Even in the strongest lessons, inspectors were in agreement with senior leaders that the ends of lessons are underused. Too often the bell rings and students move to their next lesson before reviewing what they have learned.

p.3

The quality of teaching

Lesson plans indicate how lessons will develop students’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural understanding. Often tenuous links are made but inspectors saw strong evidence of where these aspects are developed positively, particularly in science and history.

p.3

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Behaviour around the academy is mainly orderly and calm which contributes to students feeling safe. They understand how to keep themselves safe and avoid threats posed by using technology inappropriately. Students are generally polite and respectful of each other and adults and they move purposefully to and between lessons. Students have positive attitudes to learning in those lessons where teaching is strong. During these lessons, students participate well showing good teamwork skills and are able to make their own decisions about which differentiated task they will undertake. Where teaching fails to engage students, they lose focus on learning and low-level chatter is apparent. In general students enjoy life at the academy and there are no particular problems with attendance or persistent absenteeism. The academy’s close link with specific charities, The Teenage Cancer Trust and Help for Heroes is well understood by students who give generously to support these

p.3

The quality of leadership in and management of the academy

The Principal provides strong leadership and communicates high aspirations and clear aims for the academy very effectively. She is very well supported by governors. Since the academy opened, the senior team has been re-structured. There is a good blend of expertise and members of the team are driving improvements quickly and enthusiastically. During the monitoring inspection, senior and learning leaders demonstrated well their growing capacity to continue raising students’ standards of attainment.

p.4

The quality of leadership in and management of the academy

The members of the governing body have a very clear view of the quality of provision within the academy because they work very closely with senior leaders and the sponsors. Access to key information about students’ progress enables them to question leaders rigorously because they do not rely solely on what they are told. This enables them to make a very strong contribution to the development of the academy and to support and to challenge effectively when improvements are needed.

p.4

The quality of leadership in and management of the academy

Changing the system for recording and monitoring the progress made by students has been a key driver in ensuring that staff have access to the system and understand how to use it properly. After the first term of using this system, leaders and governors can identify which groups of students are achieving well and which are underachieving. The comprehensive self-evaluation document completed by learning leaders enables them to understand about the quality of teaching, students’ progress and to pinpoint precisely the training needs of the staff in their departments. Accountability extends to all because staff identify their own training needs and senior leaders ensure that these are met either by engaging external consultants or by using their own staff. Current performance management targets lack sharpness, but leaders are able to identify where improvements are evident because of the systematic approach to improving the overall quality of teaching.

p.4

External support

The sponsors provided effective support to senior leaders during the re-structuring by adding additional personnel before the appointment of the vice-principal. They continue to facilitate links with other academies within the group so that visits can be arranged and practice observed. Additional technical, financial and legal support has been provided. In addition to this help, senior leaders have the freedom to commission external consultants from a range of sources to support teachers and departments. Learning Leaders meet with other heads of department throughout the local authority and benefit from discussions and sharing ideas. Leaders have used the support from the sponsors well to deal with the most urgent issues as quickly as possible. Many staff welcome and benefit from this support, however, not all issues have been resolved.

p.4

External support

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State for Education, the Chair of the Governing Body and the Academies Advisers Unit at the Department for Education. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion