Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 21 May 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Susan Barkway

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Susan Barkway

  • Postcode verified

    NG16 4HL

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+68Positivemore positive than 67% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovingwell-plannedclearsecure

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings208w0
  • Leadership444w+68

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
652
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 30%Leadership 65%About the inspection 5%

Full report text

Anthony Cooper Headteacher Aldercar Community Language College Daltons Close Langley Mill Nottingham NG16 4HL

p.1

Language College

Following my visit to your school on 29 April 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Language College

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses in February 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher and members of the senior leadership team, representatives of the governing body, and representatives of the local authority. A telephone conversation was held with the Chair of the Governing Body. The local authority’s statement of action and the school’s improvement plan were evaluated. Serco Inspections 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T: 01216 799162 Direct email : siobhan.garrattley@serco.com

p.1

Context

Since the school was inspected, a head of department for English has been appointed and will take up post in September 2013. Five new members of the governing body have been appointed to replace five governors who resigned. There have been no further changes to the staffing of the school.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The senior leadership team knows where improvement is required and is committed to improving students’ achievement. As a result of action already taken, school records indicate that students are beginning to make better progress, particularly in English. Predictions for the percentage of students gaining A* to C in both English and mathematics at the end of Key Stage 4 are higher than for previous years. The number of students who attend school regularly has risen markedly and school evaluations suggest that a well-planned training programme, along with coaching and mentoring for individual teachers, is improving the quality of teaching.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school improvement plan contains suitable actions to drive improvements in teaching, achievement and leadership and management. These actions are linked to measurable and specific outcomes, such as improving the quality of teaching, within appropriate timescales. They are backed up by good strategies for checking the impact on the quality of teaching and students’ progress. However, the clear targets to improve students’ progress focus only on attainment and progress at the end of Key Stage 4, with no explicit expectations for students’ progress in Key Stage 3. This makes it difficult to review the impact across the whole school.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The local authority has carried out an external review of the governing body, and this has led to a programme of training and support for governors. They now have a good understanding of their responsibilities and are committed to working with the senior leadership team to make sure the school improves. They have a better understanding of pupils’ progress and a growing awareness of how well all staff are performing because they now get the information they need. Consequently, they are in a better position to challenge and support the senior leadership team.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The local authority provides very good support to the school. The statement of action includes thorough strategies to support its leaders, including the governing body, and draws on a range of consultants and external support to secure improvements in the areas identified by the Ofsted inspection. The School Progress Review Board, chaired by a senior member of the local authority and including members of the school’s senior leadership team, helps to ensure that there is no slippage in the planned actions. It also helps to monitor and evaluate the progress made towards targets. Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school’s improvement plan is fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The local authority’s statement of action is fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Derbyshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion