Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Postcode verified
CM23 4PW
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment8
“Links with other schools enable teachers to observe outstanding practice.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 640
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Judith Sparks Hillmead Primary School Woburn Avenue Bishop's Stortford CM23 4PW
p.1
Primary School, Bishop’s Stortford
Following my visit to your school on 22 April 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Primary School, Bishop’s Stortford
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in February 2013.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, I held meetings with yourself and the deputy headteacher. We jointly carried out brief visits to lessons. I met with four governors and spoke to the local authority school improvement partner. I evaluated your post Ofsted action plan and individual plans for pupils with special educational needs.
p.1
Context
Significant staff changes have happened since the inspection. Two teachers have left and three are new to the school, including the special needs coordinator. Four teachers have taken on new responsibilities, including the leadership of mathematics and information and communication technology. The Governing Body is currently led by an acting chair pending re-election of a chair of governors in May 2013.
p.1
Main findings
The school is making reasonable progress towards becoming a good school. The governors and your senior team drive improvement through fortnightly reviews of a Serco Inspections 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01216 799168 Direct email :beverley.joyner@serco.com clear action plan. The improved behaviour of pupils is a significant achievement and progress on this key issue is good. As I walked around the school, I saw pupils who were eager to learn. There was a noticeable ‘buzz’ in lessons with pupils proud to explain to me what they were doing and why.
p.1
Main findings
With the support of governors, an external consultant and the deputy headteacher you are rapidly improving teaching and learning. Teachers now check carefully how well pupils are getting on although they do not always set work which matches pupils’ ability well enough. For example, during our joint visits to lessons, we saw that some tasks are still not demanding enough, particularly for pupils in the Early Years Foundation Stage. The emphasis on developing literacy skills is visible through attractive displays around the school. These show that a love of reading and writing is now encouraged from an early age.
p.2
Main findings
You are using a new central system to analyse data on outcomes in reading, writing and mathematics and challenge teachers about pupils’ progress. Staff are not using available data well enough to inform the individual plans for pupils with special educational needs and to adjust targets for pupils making more than expected progress across all years.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders and governors have begun to take effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, I recommend that further action is taken to:
p.2
Main findings
increase challenge in the Early Years Foundation Stage to build upon the already good level of knowledge children bring to the school and ensure that accurate assessment informs the work set at Key Stage 1 use data more effectively to improve the quality of individual plans for pupils with special educational needs and adjust the targets set for the proportion of pupils making more than expected progress.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The school welcomes the high level of challenge that the local authority improvement adviser provides and draws readily on the expertise of consultants. Links with other schools enable teachers to observe outstanding practice.
p.2
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Hertfordshire.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion