Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Marianne Young
- Postcode verified
WN8 9TG
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 674
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566862 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: rcowley@cfbt.com
p.1
Mrs Valerie Fowles Headteacher Gleadless Primary School Hollinsend Road Sheffield South Yorkshire S12 2EJ
p.1
Education act 2005 to Gleadless Primary School, Sheffield
Following my visit to your school on 22 April 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Education act 2005 to Gleadless Primary School, Sheffield
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in January 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with the headteacher and senior leaders, the Chair of the Governing Body and a representative of the local authority. A telephone conversation was held with the Assistant Director (Learning and Achievement Service) from the local authority. The school’s raising attainment plan, minutes of governors meetings and other documents were evaluated. The headteacher took HMI on a tour of the school to look at teaching and learning.
p.1
Context
The deputy headteacher left the school at the end of the spring term. As a result, the senior team have been re-organised with internal appointments; they took up their posts on 1 April 2013. Three new governors have been appointed.
p.1
Main findings
The raising attainment plan lacks precision and has no measurable targets at regular intervals so that the impact of different programmes and initiatives can be assessed against improvements in pupils’ progress. Although senior leaders want to see improvements, the detail in this document is insufficiently sharp. The new members of the senior team demonstrate a keen interest in their roles but they have been in post for insufficient time for their work to have an impact. Consequently they do not know what is working well and why it is making a difference.
p.2
Main findings
The minutes of governors’ meetings show that governors are involved in all aspects of the school’s work. Questioning is detailed and governors are looking to see if the money they provide for additional resources and materials are having the desired impact. Too often, the information they receive is anecdotal and not ground in evidence. This is because leaders’ mistake how well pupils are doing compared to other pupils nationally with the progress individual pupils make in relation to their capabilities.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders are not taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the last section 5 inspection because the plans to do so are not sharply focused on rapidly bringing about improvement. The school should take immediate action to:
p.2
Main findings
improve the raising attainment plan to ensure it contains carefully considered actions and explicit success criteria with measurable targets at regular intervals make sure that leaders have a thorough understanding whether the actions taken are making a difference to the progress made by all pupils ensure that all leaders perform their roles effectively engage with local authority officers in an urgent review of provision so that the officers have first-hand knowledge of the school.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The local authority has enabled leaders to make links with other primary schools in the area. It is, however, too early to judge the impact of this work. Since the January inspection, local authority officers have met with the headteacher and Chair of the Governing Body to discuss the quality of provision and whether improvements are taking place. Local authority officers have not observed teaching, looked at pupils’ books or spoken to class teachers. An urgent review by the local authority officers, within the school, is planned to take place next month.
p.2
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children's Services for Sheffield.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion