Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Michelle Winter
- Postcode verified
RM18 7QB
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment16
“Where teaching requires improvement leaders implement individual development plans.” p.2Leadership & governance11
“Where teaching requires improvement leaders implement individual development plans.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 767
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Richard Epps Lansdowne Primary Academy Lansdowne Road Tilbury Essex RM18 7QB
p.1
Monitoring inspection visit under Section 8 of the Education Act 2005 to
Following my visit to your academy on 25 April 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the academy since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Monitoring inspection visit under Section 8 of the Education Act 2005 to
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in January 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, I met with you and your senior leaders. The assistant headteacher toured classrooms with me. I met with members of the board of directors and members of the governing body. Two consultants who provide improvement services also met with me. I reviewed documents including academy improvement plans.
p.1
Context
Since the previous inspection, the academy has appointed one full-time and two part-time teachers. One long-term supply teacher is covering the class of a teacher on maternity leave. The Chair of the Governing Body has resigned his post and the vice-chair is acting as chair. Serco Inspections 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01216 799163 Direct email :lewis.mackie@serco.com
p.1
Main findings
Leaders have appropriate systems in place to improve the quality of teaching. Where teaching requires improvement leaders implement individual development plans. Teachers receive training and benefit from regular coaching from an academy leader or an external provider. Whole staff training has been provided to improve the teaching of phonics. Leaders have introduced a new approach to teaching reading, and writing across the academy. Leaders have also introduced short additional daily mathematics sessions to improve pupils’ basic knowledge, for example of times tables. Some pupils also attend catch-up sessions to improve their literacy and numeracy skills at the linked secondary academy.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders monitor the quality of teaching by visiting classrooms, tracking the progress of pupils and looking at the work in their books. Leaders are not yet routinely considering the results of this monitoring together to give an accurate picture of teaching over time. Teachers receive targets to improve their practice but these are not routinely followed through to subsequent observations to ensure that matters improve quickly.
p.2
Main findings
Academy improvement plans address all of the areas for improvement from the January 2013 inspection and leaders have set very helpful milestone targets, which set the expectations for each term. These do not include targets for the attainment and progress of pupils in each year group however. This makes it difficult for governors and the board of directors to monitor progress rigorously.
p.2
Main findings
Members of the governing body know the academy well and visit regularly. They keep track of the academy’s actions and talk with parents and pupils to assess the impact of these actions. A member of the governing body visits the academy regularly to review progress and attainment data with an academy leader. The board of directors has responsibility for standards and progress. It has set targets for the attainment, the quality of teaching and attendance across all four academies in the learning community. However, the roles of the board of directors and the governing body have not been defined well enough. The trust has not set out clearly enough how the academy is monitored and challenged.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders, the board of directors and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the academy, I recommend that further action is taken to
p.2
Main findings
clarify and strengthen the roles of the local governing body and the board of directors in monitoring and challenging the work of the academy ensure development plans include challenging targets for the progress and attainment of pupils from Year 1 to Year 6
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted will continue to monitor the academy until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The academy purchases support from a neighboring local authority to improve the teaching of literacy and leadership. This has included a recent review of progress in addressing the areas for improvement. An external consultant is working with teachers to improve standards in mathematics. The academy also draws on support and training from its linked academies in the learning community, for instance to assure the accuracy of teachers’ assessments.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Board of Directors of The Gateway Learning Community, the Director of the Ormiston Trust and as below.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion