Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 10 May 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Linda Killman

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Linda Killman

  • Postcode verified

    AL4 9EB

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+67Positivemore positive than 65% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestronglyeffectivelyeffectiveimprovingkeen

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings476w+67
  • What needs to improve178w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Full report text

Cindy Impey Headteacher Sandridge School Woodcock Hill Sandridge St Albans AL4 9EB

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection visit under section 8 of the

Education act 2005 to Sandridge School, Hertfordshire local authority.

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection visit under section 8 of the

Following my visit to your school on 29 April 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school. This was the first visit since the most recent section 5 inspection on 5 March 2013 when it was judged to require improvement.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you and other senior leaders, governors and a representative of the local authority (LA). The school’s raising achievement plan (RAP) was evaluated. You took me on a brief tour of the school to show me where changes are making a difference to pupils’ learning.

p.1

Context

Since the last inspection the deputy headteacher has left. A new deputy and two other teachers have been appointed to start in September. Building works to accommodate growth in pupil numbers should be completed by the end of May.

p.1

Main findings

In all discussions, the emphasis on improving teaching and raising achievement came through strongly. You are steering the school through a period of change, Serco Inspections 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk selecting and positioning staff in key roles to spread the workload. The RAP is a suitable tool to move the school to good although some of the actions should be more explicit and measurable. It would benefit from extension so that staff can see the final goal and the continuum of improvement towards it. The needs and induction of new staff should be included so that there is no slippage in implementing the plan.

p.1

Main findings

Staff have received training in the teaching of phonics (links between letters and sounds) to raise standards in reading. Leaders are using data effectively to see where pupils need extra help. As a consequence, pupils are making better progress and catching up. Leaders of English and mathematics are developing their leadership skills. They could do more to help staff to recognise opportunities for pupils to apply their basic skills in other subjects.

p.2

Main findings

Governors know how to analyse and interpret achievement data. They are keen to get the best out of school visits to gather first-hand information. They support and they challenge. Governors are familiar systems to manage staff’s performance. They ensure pupil premium funding makes a difference in pupils’ achievement.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders and governors have begun to take effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommends that further action is taken to:

p.2

Main findings

 extend the RAP from three to five terms  sharpen the actions in the RAP so that they can be measured easily  use subject leaders’ expertise to identify where pupils could apply and practise their literacy and numeracy skills across the full range of subjects  make use of Ofsted’s reports and publications as examples of the best practice, especially: Mathematics: made to measure and Getting to good.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The LA has responded quickly to provide a range of support. It has helped the school to set its objectives in order of priority. Checks for progress are regular, including a full review planned later this term. It put you in touch with a high- performing school to enhance opportunities for you to tap into the best practice. It supported the recruitment process for the appointment of the new deputy. Governors have received a range of training. Financial assistance has been forthcoming to respond to the school’s expansion. I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Education for Hertfordshire.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion