Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Intake Primary SchoolOfsted inspection, 13 Mar 2013
Ofsted inspected Intake Primary School on 13 Mar 2013, led by Marianne Young. The overall judgement was Requires improvement. Ofsted published the report on 3 Apr 2013. Source: Ofsted (Open Government Licence v3).
Summary
Marianne Young (lead), Stephen Fisher
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
13 Mar 2013
- Inspectors verified
Marianne Young, Stephen Fisher
- Leadership and management AI-checked
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
DN2 6EW
- Name on report verified
Intake Primary School
- URN verified
106729
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2008.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Pupils’ rate of progress is not good in all year groups, particularly in writing, because of inconsistencies in the quality of teaching. p.1
- Pupils’ progress in writing lags behind that in reading and, particularly, their progress in mathematics. p.1
- The gap between writing and other subjects is too wide. p.1
- Teaching has improved but not enough pupils are reaching the higher levels in their work because the tasks they are given to do are not appropriate. p.1
- The attendance and punctuality in the mornings of a small number of pupils means that they miss important work. p.1
- The findings of regular monitoring are not used to set new targets so that all leaders can have a secure understanding as to whether interventions and improvements are making a difference. p.1
- Governors keep a close eye on and are working to improve their knowledge about the school’s performance. p.1
- However, some aspects of their work are underdeveloped. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 2,000
- shorter than usual (typical 2803)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 50, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Intake Primary School Sidney Road, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, DN2 6EW
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Inadequate 4 This inspection: Requires Improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires Improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requires Improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Requires Improvement 3
p.1
This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because
Pupils’ rate of progress is not good in all year groups, particularly in writing, because of inconsistencies in the quality of teaching. Pupils’ progress in writing lags behind that in reading and, particularly, their progress in mathematics. The gap between writing and other subjects is too wide. Teaching has improved but not enough pupils are reaching the higher levels in their work because the tasks they are given to do are not appropriate. The attendance and punctuality in the mornings of a small number of pupils means that they miss important work. The findings of regular monitoring are not used to set new targets so that all leaders can have a secure understanding as to whether interventions and improvements are making a difference. Governors keep a close eye on and are working to improve their knowledge about the school’s performance. However, some aspects of their work are underdeveloped.
p.1
The school has the following strengths
The headteacher provides a persistent focus to raise pupils’ achievement and improve the quality of teaching. Good teaching in the Early Years Foundation Stage ensures that children make good progress. Pupils work well and support each other in lessons, displaying positive attitudes to their learning. Visits to places of interest out of school and the topic choices in lessons are enjoyed by pupils. These help to promote their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development well.
p.1
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed teaching and learning in 13 lessons and listened to pupils read. They also observed an assembly, breaks and lunchtimes, and made short visits to lessons. Meetings were held with the headteacher, staff, groups of pupils and governors. A telephone conversation was held with a representative from the local authority. Inspectors observed the school’s work and looked at a range of evidence presented, including: the school improvement plan; tracking of pupils’ progress; monitoring reports; pupils’ books; and the school’s documentation relating to safeguarding. There were no responses from parents to the online questionnaire (Parent View).
p.2
Inspection team
Marianne Young, Lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Stephen Fisher Additional Inspector
p.2
Full report
In accordance with section 13 (4) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that the school no longer requires special measures.
p.3
Information about this school
This is an average sized primary school. Just over half of the pupils are known to be eligible for the pupil premium (additional government funding); this is well above average. The proportion of pupils identified with special educational needs through school action is above average. The proportion of pupils supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is below average. The majority of pupils are White British; there are a small number of pupils from Eastern Europe. The school exceeded the government’s floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress, in mathematics in 2012 but failed to do so in English. The school has made links with other primary schools in the area to share practice, especially the quality of teaching. When the school was previously inspected in March 2011 it was judged to require special measures because it was failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education. One of
p.3
Information about this school
Her Majesty’s Inspectors subsequently monitored the school on four occasions to check its progress.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Ensure that the quality of teaching and learning is at least good by: - making sure that teachers plan lessons carefully so that all pupils make the progress of which they are capable - ensuring that more pupils reach the higher levels in their work - ensuring that all pupils understand and can demonstrate what they are to learn and that teachers check how much pupils have learnt at the end of lessons.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Raise standards in writing and ensure that all pupils make progress which at least matches national expectations by the time they leave school in Year 6 by: - insisting that all written work done by pupils in all subjects is carefully presented - closing the gap between pupils’ progress in writing and their progress in mathematics.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Make sure that all reasonable steps are taken to secure better attendance and punctuality to school in the morning.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the effectiveness of leaders and managers, particularly those new to their roles, by: - ensuring those in leadership roles have the necessary skills and knowledge to understand how to use results from monitoring activities appropriately so that they can decide on the next steps and justify to others that their actions will improve pupils’ progress - making sure that governors have a deeper knowledge of how the pupil premium is used and how the quality of teaching influences their decisions regarding whether pay rises are justified.
p.3
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
Children join the Early Years Foundation Stage with skills that are well below those expected for their age, particularly in language and communication. They are taught well and make good progress. By the time they enter Year 1 more pupils than previously are approaching the levels expected in most areas of their learning. Classes are exciting places to learn, activities are well organised and a close eye is kept on individual children’s development. As a result, children are starting to make much better progress than they did before. Pupils’ test results and the school’s own data for 2012 show that, while pupils’ attainment improved at the end of Years 2 and 6, it is still below that seen nationally, particularly for pupils at the end of Year 6. Pupils did less well in writing compared to reading and mathematics, with girls doing better than boys. Inspectors saw that some teachers understand clearly what pupils are capable of doing in
p.4
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
lessons. However, this is not consistent and, as a result, some pupils are given work that is too hard or too easy for them. Consequently, pupils do not always achieve as well or as rapidly as they should. The progress made by all pupils, including disabled pupils and those with special educational needs, while improving strongly, is not consistent in all year groups. In 2012 more pupils made the progress expected of them in mathematics compared to the progress they made in reading and writing. This is because of a concerted whole-school approach to improve pupils’ mental mathematical skills, for example learning their times tables regularly. School data and discussions with staff suggest that improving pupils’ writing remains a key priority. Pupils supported by the pupil premium make the progress expected of them. In writing and mathematics in 2012 they reached standards above those seen nationally for these pupils. The
p.4
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
additional help they receive is a key reason why this happens. Reading is a regular part of lesson time and staff work hard to raise the profile of reading across the school. Pupils enjoy talking about their favourite books and many read with understanding and expression. They are encouraged to read at home; however, in school their enjoyment of books is hampered, on occasions, by a lack of books for everyone in the class.
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
The quality of teaching has improved significantly over the last year but requires improvement because of its impact over time on pupils’ low attainment and because the progress made by pupils in Years 1 to 6 is uneven. Too often, a strength in teaching, for example the relationships between pupils and adults, questioning pupils to ensure they understand what they are learning, and planning tasks that are at the correct level, is counter-balanced by teaching where these are not strong features. As a result, there is work to do so that all lessons match those of the best. Where the teaching and planning are at their very best, the impact on pupils’ enjoyment and progress is evident. Year 4 pupils made rapid progress in a physical education lesson because the teacher had high expectations of pupils’ capabilities. He modelled what they were to do well and through skilful questioning ensured that pupils knew and understood what they had learnt.
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
When inspectors looked at pupils’ books they saw that the quality of marking is strong within the school and is helping pupils to understand why they have made mistakes. Pupils confirmed that they understand teachers’ comments and know why they have to correct their work. ‘We need to get it right’ was a typical comment from several pupils. Teaching in the Early Years Foundation Stage is good. Regular modelling by adults and ensuring that children listen carefully to each other and speak in full sentences are key factors to improving children’s language and communication skills.
p.4
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Pupils’ attitudes in lessons are mostly positive and they work and support each other well. No lessons observed were disrupted by inappropriate behaviour. Pupils told inspectors that lessons are more exciting now. However, pupils’ attention does wander when lessons fail to grab their attention. Instances of bullying are rare and pupils are adamant that, if this situation occurs, it will be dealt with swiftly. Staff keep a sharp look out for any potential problems and ensure that pupils are clear why bullying, in any form, is not acceptable. Pupils report that they feel safe in the school and have a clear understanding about what constitutes a safe and unsafe situation. They talk positively about the school and pupils understand and use the recently introduced ‘golden rules’ well. These rules have been agreed by staff and pupils. Consequently, pupils’ respect for each other and for adults in the school has a
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
high priority. Although pupils enjoy much of what the school has to offer and attendance is broadly average, a small number of pupils do not attend regularly and are often late at the start of the day. Parents and pupils are made aware of the importance of attendance and punctuality but there is still more work to do.
p.5
The leadership and management require improvement
The headteacher has led the school decisively and been central to the removal of special measures. The inadequacies identified at the previous inspection were considerable. Instability in staffing and a lack of external consultants to help provide support and training for staff have been additional barriers. However, the headteacher has turned the school around, sourced additional help and made links with other schools so that improvements are evident. Senior leaders, some of whom are new to leadership, have raised the expectations of most staff and there is a strong focus on where further improvements are needed so that the school can become good. Ambition is evident and regular monitoring activities provide a clear picture what is going well. However, the school development plan lacks a regular time frame so that leaders can check if all pupils are on track to reach their targets. Teachers benefit from visiting other schools and understanding what constitutes effective
p.5
The leadership and management require improvement
learning. Staff training and observing each other’s lessons are commonplace. As a result, teachers are more aware of the impact of their work on pupils’ progress and the need for them to prove that their teaching is making a difference and that they are reaching their performance management objectives. These activities demonstrate leaders’ commitment to equality and in tackling discrimination and pupils’ underachievement. Pupil premium funding is making a difference to the progress made by pupils in both English and mathematics because of the additional help these pupils receive. Close monitoring by the Parent Support Adviser ensures that their attendance is better than that of their peers. The curriculum has a clear focus on the development of pupils’ social, moral, spiritual and cultural development. There is a variety of visits out of school which are enjoyed by pupils and they talk enthusiastically about visitors to the school. Inspectors saw evidence of exciting
p.5
The leadership and management require improvement
artwork throughout the school which gives pupils a good awareness of different cultures. Pupils told inspectors that they enjoy finding things out about different subjects and setting each other puzzles to solve. The local authority has conducted regular reviews of progress and the quality of teaching. They have brokered links between schools in the area so that different schools can work and learn from each other.
p.5
The leadership and management require improvement
The governance of the school: Since the previous inspection governance has improved. As a group, members of the governing body have worked closely with senior leaders to move the school forward. They have supported staff well and been instrumental in taking difficult decisions when necessary. Governors are active within the school and are developing their links with parents through newsletters and questionnaires. They ensure that statutory duties, including those relating to safeguarding, are secure. Improving their knowledge about how the pupil premium can make a difference and whether teachers should have a pay rise are underdeveloped. As a result, although governors ask questions when information is presented to them, they are not doing so from a secure and detailed knowledge.
p.6
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.7
School details
Unique reference number 106729 Local authority Doncaster Inspection number 409630
p.8
School details
This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.
p.8
School details
Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 3–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 265 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Mike Morgan Headteacher Helen Broad Date of previous school inspection 22 March 2011 Telephone number 01302 344743 Fax number 01302 360811 Email address admin@intake.doncaster.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.9
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.9
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.9
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion