Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 9 May 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    PE19 1DZ

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+20Mostly positivemore positive than 35% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingeffectiveconsistentlyclearlyimproving
Criticismnot sufficientlyinconsistencies

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings439w+20
  • What needs to improve179w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
616
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 71%What needs to improve 29%

Full report text

Angela Smith Priory Park Infant School Almond Road St Neots PE19 1DZ

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection visit under section 8 of the

Education Act 2005 to Priory Park Infant School, St Neots.

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection visit under section 8 of the

Following my visit to your school on 26 April 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection visit under section 8 of the

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in February 2013.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I held meetings with yourself and three representatives of the governing body, including the chair of governors. I spoke to the local authority primary adviser and evaluated the school strategic and operational improvement plans. We jointly went into lessons and spoke to pupils about their work. I scrutinised some lessons plans and pupils’ exercise books.

p.1

Context

There have been no significant changes to the school’s context. Three new teachers are due to join the school in September 2013.

p.1

Main findings

The school is making steady progress towards becoming a good school. The improvement plan is clearly focused on accelerating pupils’ progress and improving the quality of teaching. With the support of governors, you have set tight timescales Serco Inspections 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01216 799154 Direct email :aidan.dunne@serco.com

p.1

PROTECT-INSPECTION

for improvement and are aiming for the school’s effectiveness to be good by the end of the next academic year. Targets are set to increase the proportion of good teaching, although these are not sufficiently linked to the proportion of pupils making and exceeding expected progress. With the support of the local authority, you are tracking the school’s progress closely and hold staff to account ensuring that there is no slippage in implementing the plan. Your own evaluation has identified inconsistencies in the way teachers match activities to pupils’ ability and accuracy of assessment requires consolidation. Common approaches in marking pupils’ work are showing that pupils are told what they need to do to improve, resulting in their better progress.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

The governing body is involved in implementing and updating the improvement plan. Governors are accessing training on understanding and using performance data to challenge your senior leadership team. Governors visit the school regularly and the notes following their visits demonstrate that they are independently checking the accuracy of the information you provide on teaching and learning.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

With the support of your leadership team and governors, you have begun to take effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, I recommend that further action is taken to:

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

 check teacher assessment across and within years to verify its accuracy and to ensure that work in years 1 and 2 builds on progress made in early years  ensure that agreed strategies to improve teaching are applied more consistently across all classes to increase the proportion of pupils making and exceeding expected progress.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The local authority primary adviser checks progress on the improvement plan and visits the school regularly to provide advice and challenge. The local authority is funding the Priory-Paxton Partnership (PPP) to enable staff to share good practice. You have set up visits to good and outstanding schools to raise expectation of what it is possible to achieve.

p.2

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Cambridgeshire.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion