Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Aspris Children’s Services Limited in Herefordshire
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
27 Mar 2013
- Inspectors verified
Rachel Ruth Britten
- URN verified
SC402406
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This is because young people enjoy very positive relationships with the small, consistent staff group and feel valued as individuals by all staff and the manager. p.3
- Young people feel safe because the home operates openly and consistently with regard to risks and incidents. p.4
- Recent incidents of bullying have been dealt with very well, so that young people, social workers and stakeholders are very satisfied with the outcomes. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection. p.3
- For example, they comment that the home is able to keep young people engaged in education and therapy and to forge working relationships with their families, where many other placements have failed in these regards. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 1,250
- about usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 42, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC402406 Inspection date 27/03/2013 Inspector Rachel Ruth Britten Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 09/10/2012 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Brief description of the service
This children's home is registered to provide care to up to three young people with emotional and/or behavioural difficulties. The home is owned by a private limited company.
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress .
p.3
Progress
The children's home has demonstrated continued progress in quality of care since the last inspection in October 2012, when it was graded as ‘good’ overall. As a result, young people are making progress and the outcomes for them continue to be very good, given their starting points and the complexity of their emotional and behavioural difficulties. Young people have made significant-enough progress to move on to a larger setting where they can begin to work on their social skills.
p.3
Progress
Where appropriate, young people enjoy and benefit from continuing therapeutic links with key staff after they have left. Other young people in the home are benefiting from considerably more frequent and better quality contact visits to their family home and siblings. This is a direct result of the high quality work and cooperative relationships forged between staff and young people's parents. Young people are very positive about the home and want to stay here until they are prepared for independent living. This is because young people enjoy very positive relationships with the small, consistent staff group and feel valued as individuals by all staff and the manager. Social workers continue to be impressed by the improved outcomes young people achieve. For example, they comment that the home is able to keep young people engaged in education and therapy and to forge working relationships with their families, where many other placements have failed in these regards. Social
p.3
Progress
workers say 'it's brilliant' and they are 'very impressed' by the quality of care given by staff through high staff ratios, good supervision, and consistency.
p.4
Progress
The home have addressed the requirement and recommendation made at the last inspection. The staff continue to make timely notifications to Ofsted and other appropriate parties. They also have a transparent working style, where incidents are robustly recorded, discussed, and notified. Young people feel safe because the home operates openly and consistently with regard to risks and incidents. Continuous monitoring and discussion with other homes in the organisation ensures on-going review, development and improvement in all aspects of the home's functioning and incident management systems.
p.4
Progress
Recent improvements to records prompt staff to record young people's views and comments better and to ensure that sufficient detail is recorded and cross-referenced to other records as necessary. For example, physical intervention, missing from home, behaviour management and risk assessment record forms are all improved since the last inspection. These records now better meet regulations and standards and are more user-friendly. They are also more useable for rigorous monitoring activity, so that lessons are learnt and patterns and trends identified.
p.4
Progress
The recommendation concerning staffing levels has also been given continuing attention. Shifts are organised to ensure that members of staff never work alone overnight even if there is only one young person in residence. Lessons have also been learnt about management cover during longer periods of leave. This is because considerable stress and difficulty occurred during one such period when the contingency arrangements put in place by the manager did not prove sufficient or effective.
p.4
Progress
Young people continue to benefit from safe care and continuous opportunities for their views, wishes and feelings to be heard. Recent incidents of bullying have been dealt with very well, so that young people, social workers and stakeholders are very satisfied with the outcomes. Similarly, procedures to protect young people from exploitation and abuse are effective and individually tailored to their risks. Measures to protect young people are effective and proportionate, so that an institutional feel is avoided.
p.4
Progress
Young people understand their own plans and agreements, for example, about phones, the internet, possession and use of cigarettes and lighters and free time. They work towards trust and freedoms in clear, measured ways which are balanced with the therapeutic approach of all staff. Young people are encouraged to say their views and sign records when incidents have taken place and they all have ready access to staff and managers throughout each day. Their views and those of their families and social workers are sought by the manager who sends out feedback questionnaires on a regular basis. However, the visitor who reports monthly on the quality of the home, rarely takes into account the views of young people and other stakeholders. This is a missed opportunity for someone outside of the daily running of the home to assess and comment on the quality of the home from all these persons' points of view. The manager welcomes any such feedback and uses it
p.4
Progress
positively in her work with the staff team.
p.5
Progress
The manager and staff demonstrate good morale and insight into the strengths and weaknesses of the home. They strive to maintain consistency and achieve this, even though they are currently short of staff. They have been inspired by a 'Pillars of Parenting’ course recently attended which they say was 'Brilliant and amazing, endorsing the way we work already.' The team are also implementing an independence training pack which they have devised to prepare young people from aged 15 towards adult life. Their current agenda is to return to more planned key work with young people and less reliance on key work sessions as a 'fire fighting' response when incidents have occurred. They hope this will enhance the quality of key worker relationships with young people. The manager is currently reviewing the last six months of her own monitoring activity in order to provide Ofsted with a review of the patterns and trends in care quality.
p.5
Progress
All staff continue to work closely with social workers and liaise with them regarding the mix of young people and the impact of proposed new placements in the home. As a result, stakeholders express very high levels of confidence in the home's work.
p.5
Statutory Requirements
This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children's Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The registered person(s) must comply with the given timescales.
p.5
Reg. Requirement Due date
(2001) ensure that the visitor interviews, with their consent and in private, such of the children accommodated there, their parents, relatives and persons working in the home as appears necessary in order to form an opinion of the standard of care provided in the home. (Regulation 33 (4)(a)) 28/04/2013
p.5
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.6
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion